CaptainHawk1
Commodore
Re: Give me an F, give me an I, give me a R, give me an E, give me a D
First there is no indication that she was fired because of a morality clause. So even though it's par for the course here to represent speculation as fact, it doesn't make it so.
Second even if there was a morality clause, I can guarantee you that it would be worded to cover exactly this situation.
Beyond that, though, the standards of the community are decided by the community... not you. Whether you like it or not, that's the way it is. This is exactly why I said any other opinion other than Squiggy's is ignorant and I should have added irrelevant as well.
It's about a code of conduct/behavior that extends outside the classsroom and as Squiggy pointed out she was aware of it at the time of hire and agreed to the terms yet she blatantly violated those terms because she was more concerned about her modeling career than her job with the school district.
This is really kind of pointless. Why don't you come back to the argument after taking at least one class in Administrative Law, Contract Law and Employment Law?
Why do people still cling to the idiotic notion that there is something wrong or immoral about nudity?
It has nothing to do with the morality or immorality with nudity. It's a contract issue, nothing more. She knew what the consequences would be.
Isn't the contract issue supposed to be based on a morality clause?
Exactly. So the issue is whether nudity is immoral-- which is a rather bizarre notion.
And since nudity is NOT immoral, they had no grounds upon which to justify her being fired.It has nothing to do with the morality or immorality with nudity. It's a contract issue, nothing more. She knew what the consequences would be.
Isn't the contract issue supposed to be based on a morality clause?
First there is no indication that she was fired because of a morality clause. So even though it's par for the course here to represent speculation as fact, it doesn't make it so.
Second even if there was a morality clause, I can guarantee you that it would be worded to cover exactly this situation.
Beyond that, though, the standards of the community are decided by the community... not you. Whether you like it or not, that's the way it is. This is exactly why I said any other opinion other than Squiggy's is ignorant and I should have added irrelevant as well.
It's about a code of conduct/behavior that extends outside the classsroom and as Squiggy pointed out she was aware of it at the time of hire and agreed to the terms yet she blatantly violated those terms because she was more concerned about her modeling career than her job with the school district.
This is really kind of pointless. Why don't you come back to the argument after taking at least one class in Administrative Law, Contract Law and Employment Law?