CorporalClegg said:
And why can't Trinneer do it also?
::cough::
Because.he's.DEAD.

CorporalClegg said:
And why can't Trinneer do it also?
::cough::
klingongoat said:
CorporalClegg said:
And why can't Trinneer do it also?
::cough::
Because.he's.DEAD.![]()
PKTrekGirl said:
klingongoat said:
CorporalClegg said:
And why can't Trinneer do it also?
::cough::
Because.he's.DEAD.![]()
That minor technicality doesn't appear to be hurting Shatner's chances.![]()
Maybe that's what the film should be: A film about a producer who tries to make a film about Star Trek, and the hilarity that ensues.
don't know if it was more the writing or the performance but the character was not so much emotionless as she was intentionally condescending, overbearing, and rude.
Matango said:
What's "Enterprise" ?
Seriously....
klingongoat said:
Anyway, there's no reason why Shatner's appearance in Trek XI can't take place in a time period before the events of "Generations".
Menacing Horta said:
Are you kidding, Spock could be a real prick.
Menacing Horta said:
On one condition only. Spock walks in and says, "Oh hi, grandma. Hi, granddad."
...and the fans burn down the theaters.![]()
furthering on the ideas brought forward in TATV (ENT).
Captain59 said:
I'm pretty sure either Bakula or Blalock will be in the movie.
Shat, eat your heart out.
indranee said:
Captain59 said:
I'm pretty sure either Bakula or Blalock will be in the movie.
Shat, eat your heart out.
please, no. I'd rather have the Shat in it than those two.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.