• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Give and take regarding the younger fans

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ampris

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Red Shirt
Might be treading on thin ice here, but bear with me. This isn't directed at anyone specifically, just responding to a feeling I keep getting from some older fans who feel the need to remark ALL the time about how this movie, based on what little we've seen, is obviously dumbed down for this 'MTV generation' who can't think, can't sit still for more than twenty minutes without being engaged by shit blowing up, and are generally worthless. They've ruined Star Trek by pandering to these monkeys, they say, but believe it or not I find that insulting. (As a member of that generation, see.) But that's not exactly the main point.

Because the way I see it, the only part of the movie that solid opinions can be based on, so far, are the visuals. The props, art direction, all that stuff. We've gotten a good enough glimpse of that stuff, I think, and if you don't like what you've seen, that's fine by me. But the thing is, the story, the acting, the complete themes and things like that all largely remain to be seen. And in my eyes, there really isn't any apparent connection between these two points. Basing a negative opinion on how a thing looks isn't new, but writing off this movie as trash for the younger, brain-dead generation because it's 'pretty and flashy' just doesn't make any sense to me. Yes, this movie's visuals are definitely a product of it's time, but so what? That doesn't offer any indication at all of what the movie will be like, and I offer TWoK as an argument:

First of all, it's a great movie, and obviously "Star Trek" enough, but it looks nothing like TOS. It looks nothing like TMP, either. And aside from not looking much like any other previous Trek, it also has a notoriously Eighties look. Now, I love Disney World as much as the next person, but, I'm sorry, when I watch Wrath I have to make a conscious effort to see the 23d century instead of EPCOT. (Which, I should probably note, is a very retro looking place.) But you know what? That doesn't take away from the movie! Not in my opinion, at least. It's visually completely different than what I've grown up with, have defined as 'good,' but I can still appreciate it as the good Trek movie it is if I try to, instead of merely seeing the trappings and dismissing it off-hand as 'another goofy Eighties movie.'

Do you see what I'm saying? If people raised in this generation can cope with watching this TV show/movie series that's really obviously marked as being from another time, is it *that* hard for the fans from those periods to adjust to seeing visuals, etc., from this era? Am I just being naive? Because if a kid doesn't watch TOS based solely on how it looks, eyes roll and noses turn up because he's clearly too silly to see what's good about the show without being turned off by the plywood and Styrofoam sets, and oh those kids today, so why do the older fans get a free pass for doing the same thing?

I don't know. it's just, I feel like I'm not welcome sometimes. I don't want to have to feel bad about looking forward to this movie, but there it is. I must only be excited because it's pretty or for the OMG KEWL EXPLOSIONS!!!1!, because everyone my age is really, really stupid. I just wanna see a good Trek movie, y'know? In theaters, no less. That's going to be awesome. I'd like to enjoy it. :/


(Uh, unless, of course, the movie actually sucks balls inside and out. Then this is all moot. But I'd at least like to have the chance to see it without being judged unfairly.)


(And sorry if this is spammy; I just needed to vent a little bit. And note, this isn't really about the TrekBBS; well, maybe a little bit, but mostly regarding other places and just Trekdom in general.)
 
You, see, I'm between those two generations, so I have a different insight.

Then again, every over 40 year old dedicated trek fan I've met has achieved less in their life than the 18 year old MTV generation people I met...

Anyway, being inbetween the two generations, I see one thing is common. They are both as bad as eachother when it comes to trek.

Myself, I don't really care if canon is butchered...because truthfully, canon has been given a good jab up the ass by many a screenwriter already to leave it bleeding puss and begging for no more soap to drop.

The older generation, are like most of the people from that generation. They're old school those who were around during the time first cursed television. Traditionalist and stuck in certain ways, where change is harder to accept.

Now, the co called MTV generation...well, I don;t see any immaturity on their part which does not exist in the older geenration of trek fans, Infact I've got soem friends of the MTV geenration which surprise me with their maturity. They read classic and listen to classics, they listen to mdoern rap and read dribble magazines...I find that generation more open and welcoming than most others.

The majority aren;t the stoners with low attention span....you'll find just as many (if not more) in the 50+ year old trek fan base to be honest. The biggest weirdoes I've met are from that 50 year old group...

"Look a dimensional vortex!"

"Thats the moons reflection off a weird shaped cloud dude."
 
Boobs in Star Trek? Did someone miss 7 of 9 and T'Pol?

Although the cleavege factor was somewhat lacking.
 
The older generation, are like most of the people from that generation. They're old school those who were around during the time first cursed television. Traditionalist and stuck in certain ways, where change is harder to accept.

Damn straight! Helen Noel forever!
 
your not worth my time to insult and your generation is going to save the world? I should just kiss my ass goodby now.
 
I'm among the oldest fans here; dunno if I'm actually the oldest. I was twelve when TOS premiered.

There are two major areas of complaint I'm seeing from long-time fans:

1) They've changed the way that "Star Trek" looks;
2) The movie is not respecting established events from previous Trek.

Complaint number two is way overblown by lots of folks, because most of the (at this point presumed) contradictions to "established events" are either not actually established outside the realms of auxiliary (so-called "non-canon") material - like the question of whether the Enterprise was built in space or on Earth - or are just contradictions to extrapolations from established events that have taken strong hold as expectations among some fans. Eliminate those categories and each person simply has to decide how objectionable they find the few real contradictions.

Complaint number one - well, for some people there's some congruence here with the second complaint: changing "the look" is itself contradicting "established events" and it's objectionable on that score. If that's not a problem in and of itself, though, then this complaint boils down entirely to subjective aesthetic preferences. There's no real ground for reasoning or compromise where that's concerned - if someone's favorite color is red you can't persuade them to prefer blue.
 
Might be treading on thin ice here, but bear with me. This isn't directed at anyone specifically, just responding to a feeling I keep getting from some older fans who feel the need to remark ALL the time about how this movie, based on what little we've seen, is obviously dumbed down for this 'MTV generation' who can't think, can't sit still for more than twenty minutes without being engaged by shit blowing up, and are generally worthless. They've ruined Star Trek by pandering to these monkeys, they say, but believe it or not I find that insulting. (As a member of that generation, see.) But that's not exactly the main point.

I don't know. it's just, I feel like I'm not welcome sometimes. I don't want to have to feel bad about looking forward to this movie, but there it is. I must only be excited because it's pretty or for the OMG KEWL EXPLOSIONS!!!1!, because everyone my age is really, really stupid. I just wanna see a good Trek movie, y'know? In theaters, no less. That's going to be awesome. I'd like to enjoy it. :/

The. Ship. Is. Built. On. The. Ground. Only for the kewl visual of Kirk riding up to it on is kewl motorcycle.

That pretty much sums up the entire problem with this movie.
 
Most star trek movies have some problems but were still fine movies. things have been changed in this movie but this new film is aimed at a larger group than just the fans we know this. if this movie can bring new life to star trek then i'm going to give it a chance. many of the people on this site have liked what they have seen. Now are the rest of us ready to give this movie a chance or write star trek for good ? Because the younger fans are standing behind this movie and lets face it they are the future of Trek .​
 
Might be treading on thin ice here, but bear with me. This isn't directed at anyone specifically, just responding to a feeling I keep getting from some older fans who feel the need to remark ALL the time about how this movie, based on what little we've seen, is obviously dumbed down for this 'MTV generation' who can't think, can't sit still for more than twenty minutes without being engaged by shit blowing up, and are generally worthless. They've ruined Star Trek by pandering to these monkeys, they say, but believe it or not I find that insulting. (As a member of that generation, see.) But that's not exactly the main point.

I don't know. it's just, I feel like I'm not welcome sometimes. I don't want to have to feel bad about looking forward to this movie, but there it is. I must only be excited because it's pretty or for the OMG KEWL EXPLOSIONS!!!1!, because everyone my age is really, really stupid. I just wanna see a good Trek movie, y'know? In theaters, no less. That's going to be awesome. I'd like to enjoy it. :/

The. Ship. Is. Built. On. The. Ground.

So. F*cking. What?


There is no "onscreen evidence" that indicates that the 1701 was built in space. In fact TMoST (written WITH GENE RODDENBERRY) states the ship was built on Earth, San Fancisco Yards, according to the ship's dedication plaque.
Only for the kewl visual of Kirk riding up to it on is kewl motorcycle.
You have yet to explain why this is a problem, either. In fact Shatner was actually a motorcycle buff himself in his salad days. Kirk on a motorcycle as a youngster isn't that big a deal.
That pretty much sums up the entire problem with this movie.
I doubt that, considering how often you're here to complain about a movie you have no intention of seeing.



I'm over 40 and have no problem with this film. From what I have seen so far, and from the interviews I've read, it looks like we're going to get a good film and the fresh blood Star Trek sorely needs.
 
Best thing about having new, younger fans around? Increase the probability of hitting on a fine nice ass. That's never a bad thing.
 
One thing is certain, the nature of being a fan will change. I don't think you'll see this movie recreate any kind of Trek phenomenon. We (the older ones) were Trek's version of Beatlemania. And that's not often repeated. That is, I can't see this movie creating fans who will scream for a new Trek series on TV or anything like that. They will like THIS movie, and look forward to more. Pine and the rest may be in them, but in time, Trek movies will probably become a bit like the Jame Bond series, with different actors becoming Kirk and such. And the fans will be cool with it as long as the stories are good.
 
The present generation of TV is often more complex and more demanding of the viewers than any TV shows of the past. In the past, executives would pretty much insult the intellegence of the average viewer and dumb down thier material for fear that people would not understand complex relationships/plots/whatever. This has changed. Compare old BSG with nuBSG.

I would say that today, in fact, audiences are much more sophisticated than they were 40 years ago. This is why, for example, local newspapers are in terminal decline. People arn't so interested anymore of the local events of the village next door. People are more connected with world events. More people participate in debate through new media like the internet.

Cinema is darker than ever before. People are less innocent and restrained. People expect more from thier entertainment. When they look at a movie, they want to be able to see something that is more than a simple fantasy with crappy props.

There are cretinous people in each generation but I beleive that the present time is as good as any to produce a really great Trek film that will stand the test of time :)
 
The. Ship. Is. Built. On. The. Ground. Only for the kewl visual of Kirk riding up to it on is kewl motorcycle.

That pretty much sums up the entire problem with this movie.

I'm speculating here, but I imagine that visiting the construction site provides the final impetus for Kirk to join Starfleet. It's a physical, tangible, reference as to his potential future, as opposed to abstract concepts and second-hand observations from Pike and such. The "kewl visual" will serve the character, and having the Enterprise on the ground during construction may be relevant outside that scene also. Personally, I'll take character development over strict adherence to masturbatory technical minutiae any day of the week. Not that the two are necessarily exclusive.

The flyby in TMP could reasonably be described as a "kewl visual" with little else going for it. Certainly after the first three hours.
 
Last edited:
The. Ship. Is. Built. On. The. Ground.

Whoa, you noticed that?

Well, it's all good. Building the ship on the ground doesn't violate anything established on screen, and there's no reason not to do it.

Building it in Riverside, Iowa appears to contradict the ship's never-legible-on-screen "dedication plaque." Perhaps there will be an explanation for that, perhaps not. In either event, it's trivial and unimportant.
 
The. Ship. Is. Built. On. The. Ground. Only for the kewl visual of Kirk riding up to it on is kewl motorcycle.

Is it? Or could it possible be that the writers thought of a way to break the Trek cliche of showing yet another starship under construction in a space filigree?

As Rii points out it serves the character by giving us, the audience, something visceral and tangible. Not only that but it's awe inspiring.

I grew up in San Diego, often driving down Harbor near the NASCO shipyards and seeing the ships under construction. Let me tell ya that seeing something huge being built like a Navy ship ignites something deep in the imagination and having it so close, hovering stores above you, is well... awesome cool.

So yeah it's a "kewl" (insert sarcasm-thrown-back here) visual.

That pretty much sums up the entire problem with this movie.

No. It pretty much sums up YOUR entire problem with this movie.

Subjective tastes are not fact despite the propensity of the internet to believe that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top