trevanian
Rear Admiral
Really? I'll be happy to be proven wrong, but you're going to have to point me to some specific images and not one isolated scene in the film.I think people overstate this lighting from below thing in TMP...
No, it is present in plenty other spots, just not necessarily always motivated by in-frame source lights.
For instance, I *did* look, and while I see a lot of cross-lighting, I see virtually nothing from below, not even fill.
Bridge
Bridge
Engine room
Engine Room
Bridge after wormhole
Kirk's Quarters
Lounge
Bridge later
Rec Deck
Airlock
Sickbay
Bridge near end
Bridge at end
You know where I see lighting from below? The corridors, and in the "microwave wok" that is the V'ger set.
Kindly point me to examples of this prevalent underlight.
Right off, your 1061 and 250 jpg have plenty indications. The back part of the airlock shot is darker toward top of frame, showing falloff from light-from-below, and the way the light fails to fall on Spock but does fall on the security guy looks motivated low. The shot of scot and Kirk in engineering is clearly lower (probably from the engine horizontal thing), because you've got the light illuminating (not glaringly) their chin throat more than the hair on their heads.
Again, largely from the side, but low, not from a useful angle.
I've got a copy of the old photonovel in the trunk of my car. When I'm at work today I'll thumb through it and try to note a few examples. From what I recall, the movie is very 'fill happy' in terms of light, it is just all angled 'wrong.'
EDIT ADDON your 436 is another one where the light is definitely from a low unflattering angle for the most part, since Kelley's body is reading a bit brighter than his head, and I'm not referring to uniform color. There is an obnoxious light kick on the rail low down, too.
Last edited: