Generations had a bigger budget than ST6, so why...

The test screenings were so poor they were forced to reshoot the end. Even with the revised ending, audience reviews were lukewarm.

According to the Wikipedia article on the movie, it was shot in just 56 days! Production was so rushed, Frakes and Burton wore Avery Brooks and Colm Meaneys costumes from DS9. Apparently, filming on Generations was happening concurrent with filming on All Good Things.

Ron Moore: I think that is probably a valid point. If you listen to the commentary track on the Generations DVD, Brannon [Braga] and I talk pretty openly about our dissatisfaction with Generations and the reasons why it went south and the reasons we are not happy with it. I kind of feel it was a missed opportunity and a movie that just didn’t come together.

I really think that with more development time, this movie could have been great.


Yup. Everyone was pissed at how Kirk was "shot in the back". With the scene available to view, now more than a select group of audiences in test screenings can see it. There's a tangible sense of tragedy and palpable gut-punch in his demise in the deleted scene, with Soran accomplishing what Khan could not (ouch!!), which doesn't exist at all in what was filmed and released instead - which is corny to the max. Kirk was to be killed off in a surprise and unexpected moment, since TNG was the future and it's too dorky fairytale to have Kirk survive. (Yep! Decades before Luke Skywalker, James Kirk was killed off for dramatic effect.)
 
I feel like we lost out on one last good Kirk fistfight by changing the ending of Ggenerations. But honestly, there was no good way to kill Kirk in the scenario they scripted. His "first death" in the opening was the way for him to go.
 
I actually kind of liked that the makers of Deep Space Nine trolled the viewers by using it yet again *in the final episode*.
They reused a few very memorable shots.

But that was a TV show, so I give it a pass. I remember when JAG used the main action set piece from Clear and Present Danger. Oy.
 
They reused a few very memorable shots.

But that was a TV show, so I give it a pass. I remember when JAG used the main action set piece from Clear and Present Danger. Oy.
I never noticed, but then Clear and Present Danger was never my favorite Jack Ryan film.
 
I actually kind of liked that the makers of Deep Space Nine trolled the viewers by using it yet again *in the final episode*.

I don't think that was trolling so much as at that point, DS9's effects budget was blown so they were re-using shots left and right and robbing Peter to pay Paul. (Note how many shots of the Defiant are re-used even though by that time it's the Sao Paolo.)
 
They should have dumped the boat scene at the beginning, just have them celebrating Worf's promotion in Ten Forward and given the Duras sisters a contemporary Klingon battlecruiser.
 
Well a Ten Forward party is hardly the cinematic introduction to the TNG cast they were looking for. That would work on TV in a season premiere or finale (such as when Sisko got his promotion). And it also introduced Data's issues understanding jokes. I guess they could have had him shove a cake into Beverly's face but, again, that feels very "television."

I liked the original idea of the Enterprise coming out of the sun to engage the Romulans at the observatory.
 
Well a Ten Forward party is hardly the cinematic introduction to the TNG cast they were looking for. That would work on TV in a season premiere or finale (such as when Sisko got his promotion). And it also introduced Data's issues understanding jokes. I guess they could have had him shove a cake into Beverly's face but, again, that feels very "television."

I liked the original idea of the Enterprise coming out of the sun to engage the Romulans at the observatory.

But if the boat scene (among others) compromises the budget forcing them into cheaping out on action scenes, what's the point? The way generations was shot, it would have looked good regardless, the film looks stunning.
 
Yup. Everyone was pissed at how Kirk was "shot in the back". With the scene available to view, now more than a select group of audiences in test screenings can see it. There's a tangible sense of tragedy and palpable gut-punch in his demise in the deleted scene, with Soran accomplishing what Khan could not (ouch!!), which doesn't exist at all in what was filmed and released instead - which is corny to the max. Kirk was to be killed off in a surprise and unexpected moment, since TNG was the future and it's too dorky fairytale to have Kirk survive. (Yep! Decades before Luke Skywalker, James Kirk was killed off for dramatic effect.)
what? where I can watch that?
 
I found it from Google years ago. Appaling quality though.

The novelisation still had Kirk being shot in the back.
 
But if the boat scene (among others) compromises the budget forcing them into cheaping out on action scenes, what's the point?

As I mentioned earlier in the thread, the boat scene really didn't blow the budget. What did was paying $6 million to Shatner, $1 million each to Doohan and Koenig, and signing the TNG cast to their movie contracts. That ate a lot out of a $30 million budget. (Edit: So did the incredibly compressed filming schedule; the old adage of "fast, cheap and good, pick two" really applied on Generations.)

After that, ILM told the production staff, "You can afford a really great space battle, or you can have a really great saucer crash. You cannot afford both."
 
Last edited:
I read the original version, and I prefer the version we got.

I wonder how GEN might have turned out if it hadn't suffered budget limitations. It was certainly ambitious, and the Klingon battle had room for being...an actual battle...but no amount of money could innately fix the story problems.
 
Back
Top