• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

General "Likes" and "Dislikes" Regarding Kelvinverse

Vger23

Vice Admiral
Admiral
I thought it would be interesting to see what the "likes" and "dislikes" are, IN GENERAL, regarding the three Kelvinverse films. I know, on the whole, I accept and very much enjoy them...so there's a lot to like. But, there's also things that frustrate me or don't resonate. I thought it would be interesting to capture those and see the differences in people's thoughts.

Let's try to do ourselves a favor and avoid being "really funny" by saying stuff like "I don't like any of it and I hate all of it."

LIKE:
1. TOS-focus (using new versions of the original characters- and not trying to be Star Trek The NEXT Next Generation)
2. Adventure and action oriented stories- love that they've gotten away from ponderous, preachy dialogue and dismal soul-sucking debate/banter
3. Fun, thrilling structure
4. The cast...they are all brilliant. Even the "guest players" are all very good (Greenwood, Cumby, etc)
5. The music is awesome. Not Jerry Goldsmith circa TMP / TFF awesome, but pretty damned good.
6. Good emotional punch. I've gotten misty-eyed in each movie. There were TOS movies that I love that didn't get me misty-eyed. Again, I think this is largely due to the cast's performances.
7. Well-placed and well-timed humor
8. Simple adventure stories...not trying to be "Game of Thrones" in space where everyone cares about the political climate and how the Tholians and the Calamarain are going to respond to the destruction of Romulus and crap like that.

DISLIKE:
1. The production design is, almost completely, a source of irritation. I don't like the props, ships, sets, etc. at all.
2. Over-done action. Sometimes, I get dizzy and find myself with a headache watching the massive amount of punching, jumping, punching, shouting, punching, shooting, punching and falling that goes on. Oh, and they punch a lot.
3. Under-utilizing the Kirk-Spock-Bones dynamic (although Beyond did a much better job here)
4. Transwarp Beaming (again, thank you Beyond for sending this in the same scrap heap that Nemesis sent the emotion chip into)
5. Caricature NuKirk. I love Chris Pine and I love the evolution of the Kirk character in these movies...but I hate the "Kirk is a total reckless cowboy" and "Kirk is a manwhore" stuff being over-done. Again, thank you Beyond for largely getting rid of this and letting Kirk just be Kirk.
6. Over-Emotional NuSpock. I'd need another hour to write on this one. I love Quinto, and I like his portrayal during "normal" times...but then there's the other stuff that seems a bit over-the-top (and yes, I know that Spock when he was younger on TOS was portrayed as being less emotionally controlled...but he was never screaming, crying, and beating people to death regularly with his bare hands).
7. The phasers are these little pop guns. There's no more beam weapons. Fanboy boo-hoo.

Interesting analysis here...I'd say that Beyond was the film most devoid of the things that have frustrated me.

What say you?
 
Pretty much agree with the OP.

One other thing that really bothers me about the nu-verse is the Star Wars portrayal of all the alien species, pretty much none of which are recognizable from any other Trek production. It's like walking into the Cantina in ANH. Where are the Andorians? The Tellarites? Efrosians? Deltans? Who are these weird-headed guys and where did they come from?
 
Pretty much agree with the OP.

One other thing that really bothers me about the nu-verse is the Star Wars portrayal of all the alien species, pretty much none of which are recognizable from any other Trek production. It's like walking into the Cantina in ANH. Where are the Andorians? The Tellarites? Efrosians? Deltans? Who are these weird-headed guys and where did they come from?

The F-14 Tomcat is the greatest aircraft ever created by mankind. Well done.
 
The funny thing is that I agree with everything you're saying here, despite both of us throwing shit at each other in the other thread.
 
The funny thing is that I agree with everything you're saying here, despite both of us throwing shit at each other in the other thread.

I honestly didn't mean to piss you off to the extent I did (meant to get a rise...not piss off). And yes, we are hurling feces across the internet at Warp speed.
 
When it comes down to it, I guess my likes and dislikes mostly concern HOW the films are made, in particular writing and directing. Under Abrams/Orci/Kurtzman/Lindelof, I don't like the movies. You take them out of the equation and replace them with Lin/Pegg/Jung, that results in BEYOND which I found enjoyable in a way I never felt about the first two. It truly makes a difference.
 
Likes:
Pretty much everything.

Dislikes:
Kirk's superpromotion was silly.
Spock's "Khaaaaaaan!"
That everyone doesn't love the films as much as me.
That they're not setting the box office on fire.
That Beyond may be the last.
 
I think I'm in concurrence with a lot of the OP's points as well... though the tech things and spaceships are in the like category for me. It took me a bit of time to adjust to the new Enterprise, but it's grown on me, as well as the look and feel of the new universe.

Much of what I wouldn't have liked about the Kelvin universe, Beyond left Behind as well. The story was tighter, no strange moments like Spock screaming, and the like.

I really wish this could be the face of Star Trek going forward because I do think the franchise needed a hard, swift kick in the complacency. I'm tired of the B&B quality show handed to us since the late 80s. That's not the face of Star Trek I enjoy. Beyond and the new movies are a lot closer to my idea of Star Trek than Trek's allowed to be recently.
 
I like a lot of things about the Kelvinverse, but it is too fast and slick. In the prime universe, the ship was just as much a character as the people. There is no comparison between the Kelvin Enterprise and the prime 1701/1701-A/D, NX-01 or Voyager.

It is set in the same Federation as the prime universe, but where are the traditional aliens? It feels like I'm watching Star Wars.

And just because the timeline was altered, it doesn't explain the look, sound and feel of the technology... the Enterprise bridge looking like an Apple store, or Yorktown base looking like something from the 26th century.
 
And I don't like that one movie (Into Darkness) rips off an earlier movie in the same franchise (The Wrath of Khan)... and does a poor job of it.
 
From Star Trek Online...


Examination of the time-lost salvage taken from the Kelvin Timeline reveals that the Federation of that reality had a decidedly higher investment in advanced military technology, likely as a direct result of their overwhelming defeat at the hands of the alien vessel that invaded their space in the 23rd Century. The same has shown to be true of the Klingon and Romulan ships of that time. This emphasis allows their technology - though technically hundreds of years old - to be comparable with our own in the early 25th Century.
 
LIKE:

- HUMOR
- Look of the universe, ships, costumes. Visually the three movies are STUNNING
- The movies look big budget for once
- Acting capabilities
- Music

DISLIKE:

- The writing/storylines
- Aliens/Villains 'of the week'
- Unbelievable plotpoints like Keenser's snot, Khan's super blood etc.
- Too much focus on action, too little on characters
- Use of old characters instead of new ship with new people
- Into Darkness ripping off The Wrath of Khan
- Spock getting emotional all the time
 
Keenser's snot

Wait, why is that so silly in an alien?

A lot of human mucus is a really strong alkaline. One that's strong enough to stop the practically-hydrochloric-acid from burning its way out of your stomach. And there's a shocking amount of insects that can spit or regurgitate acid without harming themselves (for eg. Green ants.)

If our bodies carry that corrosive shit around all the time, it doesn't seem that unbelievable that the completely alien Keensers biology could deal with the potential drawbacks of doing the same.
 
Last edited:
His mucus corroded and destroyed dense advanced metals from an ancient race, on a lock, designed to resist a lot worse than him.
 
Was it? Where was that mentioned? As far as I know it was designed only to, well, keep the door locked. It could be designed to keep fingers and rocks from opening it, not corrosive acid destroying it.

The whole base was supposed to be basically a mining colony, not a military installation.
 
Likes:
Good actors
Musical score
Just the right amount of humor
Updated designs for current generation of fans (ships, uniforms)
Really cool visuals even if they are unbelievable (ship underwater)

Dislikes:
Transwarp beaming - what's the point of a starship?
Excessive Lens flares
No concept of size of space (travel time from Earth to Vulcan/Qo'nos)
Ridiculous plot points (eject the warp core then go to maximum warp!, just show up at the academy with no entrance exam required!, billions of people in solar system with thousands of starships traveling there everyday but no one noticed the Vengeance being built in orbit of Jupiter!, threaten to fire torpedos at Qo'nos from edge of Klingon space as if Klingons only occupy one solar system!, the entire fleet is hanging out in the Laurentian system!, incredibly high-tech bridge but incredibly low-tech engine room!)

On the whole, I like nuTrek. But man, there are some things I would have liked to change. No movie can ever be perfect and these movies hit a lot of high notes, but there are some jarring low notes there as well.
 
I thought it would be interesting to see what the "likes" and "dislikes" are, IN GENERAL, regarding the three Kelvinverse films. I know, on the whole, I accept and very much enjoy them...so there's a lot to like. But, there's also things that frustrate me or don't resonate. I thought it would be interesting to capture those and see the differences in people's thoughts.

Let's try to do ourselves a favor and avoid being "really funny" by saying stuff like "I don't like any of it and I hate all of it."

LIKE:
1. TOS-focus (using new versions of the original characters- and not trying to be Star Trek The NEXT Next Generation)
2. Adventure and action oriented stories- love that they've gotten away from ponderous, preachy dialogue and dismal soul-sucking debate/banter
3. Fun, thrilling structure
4. The cast...they are all brilliant. Even the "guest players" are all very good (Greenwood, Cumby, etc)
5. The music is awesome. Not Jerry Goldsmith circa TMP / TFF awesome, but pretty damned good.
6. Good emotional punch. I've gotten misty-eyed in each movie. There were TOS movies that I love that didn't get me misty-eyed. Again, I think this is largely due to the cast's performances.
7. Well-placed and well-timed humor
8. Simple adventure stories...not trying to be "Game of Thrones" in space where everyone cares about the political climate and how the Tholians and the Calamarain are going to respond to the destruction of Romulus and crap like that.

DISLIKE:
1. The production design is, almost completely, a source of irritation. I don't like the props, ships, sets, etc. at all.
2. Over-done action. Sometimes, I get dizzy and find myself with a headache watching the massive amount of punching, jumping, punching, shouting, punching, shooting, punching and falling that goes on. Oh, and they punch a lot.
3. Under-utilizing the Kirk-Spock-Bones dynamic (although Beyond did a much better job here)
4. Transwarp Beaming (again, thank you Beyond for sending this in the same scrap heap that Nemesis sent the emotion chip into)
5. Caricature NuKirk. I love Chris Pine and I love the evolution of the Kirk character in these movies...but I hate the "Kirk is a total reckless cowboy" and "Kirk is a manwhore" stuff being over-done. Again, thank you Beyond for largely getting rid of this and letting Kirk just be Kirk.
6. Over-Emotional NuSpock. I'd need another hour to write on this one. I love Quinto, and I like his portrayal during "normal" times...but then there's the other stuff that seems a bit over-the-top (and yes, I know that Spock when he was younger on TOS was portrayed as being less emotionally controlled...but he was never screaming, crying, and beating people to death regularly with his bare hands).
7. The phasers are these little pop guns. There's no more beam weapons. Fanboy boo-hoo.

Interesting analysis here...I'd say that Beyond was the film most devoid of the things that have frustrated me.

What say you?

My list would've looked just like yours, so I've decided to save time and just requote it and give it a thumbs up. ;) :techman:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top