Gay couple detained near MORMAN plaza

[Miss Chicken]

Um, I might point out Heteros are not in the habit of making out on Mormon church grounds. & Miss Chicken peeing on each other is what was considered indecent in SF, not hugs & cheeks kisses.

Giving someone a hug and a kiss is not "making out". It is quite common behaviour for women, and some men, to hug and kiss when greeting where I live (and women here will often hug and kiss either sex)

I think that peeing on someone would be considered indecent in most places in the world and should be arrestable behaviour (and I am certain it is considered indecent in most situations in SF)- but all along I have been talking specifically about this case not the case that you brough up that is totally unrelated to this case.

 

[Rii]

Um, I might point out Heteros are not in the habit of making out on Mormon church grounds.

I think you'll find that most homosexuals aren't in the habit of making out on church grounds either. They're more subtle than that, implacable in their insidious infiltration of your idyllic heterosexual society. They're all around you.

& same sex behavior is by & large considered gross by the masses.

Folks don't like it when I crack my knuckles either.

 

[voggmo]

Um, I might point out Heteros are not in the habit of making out on Mormon church grounds. & Miss Chicken peeing on each other is what was considered indecent in SF, not hugs & cheeks kisses.

Giving someone a hug and a kiss is not "making out". It is quite common behaviour for women, and some men, to hug and kiss when greeting where I live (and women here will often hug and kiss either sex)

I think that peeing on someone would be considered indecent in most places in the world and should be arrestable behaviour (and I am certain it is considered indecent in most situations in SF)- but all along I have been talking specifically about this case not the case that you brough up that is totally unrelated to this case.

Then we're in agreement the peeing thing. Too bad the Ghey/Left don't concur. Yes, most Homosexuals probably don't do the church thing too much, but public restrooms, ( don't tap your foot!), are more common for them. & yes they are all around me. I had a shop teacher when I was 13 that liked groping us minors. Belongs in jail that one.

 

[Gepard]

Then we're in agreement the peeing thing. Too bad the Ghey/Left don't concur.

*stands up, raises hand*

Hi, my name is Gep Malakai, and I'm liberal and support homosexual rights. I also think water sports are disgusting. I, and the many, many left-wing/gay-supporting people out there who would agree with me do not appreciate being painted with such a broad, straw-man brush. Thank you.

*sits back down*

I had a shop teacher when I was 13 that liked groping us minors. Belongs in jail that one.

Sorry to hear it, but gay != pedophile.

 

[voggmo]

Good for you Gep, now E-mail SF mayor or write a letter & tell him to clean up his city's image & arrest ANYONE that pees on people in public streets. Don't make special allowances for gays. If a straight did it somewhere else not on parade day, he or she would be locked up, but apparently Gays have exclusive peeing rights there.

& Pederasty is the correct term.

 

[Rii]

Then we're in agreement the peeing thing. Too bad the Ghey/Left don't concur.

Urine can be used as fertiliser. Urination in public parks should be considered tax deductible.

 

[Hoser]

apparently Gays have exclusive peeing rights there.

Urination in public parks should be considered tax deductible.

Two! Two posts that made me laugh.

 

[RJDiogenes]

Let's keep the debate on track here, folks. Don't start getting personal or ideological. Thank you.

It goes both ways these public things.


Four San Diego firefighters have won a discrimination lawsuit.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/uploadedImages/Media/Images/Brush fire.jpg

WorldNetDaily 8/7/08

voggmo, do not quote complete articles. And when you do quote articles, include a link to your source.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Good for you Gep, now E-mail SF mayor or write a letter & tell him to clean up his city's image & arrest ANYONE that pees on people in public streets. Don't make special allowances for gays. If a straight did it somewhere else not on parade day, he or she would be locked up, but apparently Gays have exclusive peeing rights there.

Are you talking about San Francisco? Because all I've found on it is this:

San Francisco supervisors voted unanimously today to make it illegal to urinate or defecate on city streets, but added an exception for people with a "verified medical condition.''

I'm pretty sure they're not lobbing homosexuals into that group.

 

[voggmo]

But they didn't enforce it Spaceman.






Tithes are tax deductable. So in a way, indirect support of peeing through tithes accomplishes the same thing.

Richard Sipe, a psychotherapist and former priest, has studied celibacy, chastity, and sexuality in the priesthood for four decades. He has authored three books on the topic. He once estimated that 30% of the priesthood is homosexually oriented. 5 Elsewhere, he is quoted as estimating that between 25% and 45% of American priests are homosexual in orientation.


Bishop Jerome Listecki is an auxiliary bishop in Chicago. He estimates that "perhaps more than 10%" of priests have a homosexual orientation."(Emphasis ours).

Father Donald Cozzens, an author, psychologist, and Catholic seminary president says that there is such a high percentage of gay priests in the church that he is concerned that “the priesthood is or is becoming a gay profession.” 5 In his book, "The Changing Face of the Priesthood," -- published in the year 2000 -- he estimates that 50% of Roman Catholic priests have a homosexual orientation.

Conclusion: If we assume that all of the estimates are of equal validity, then about 33% of priests have a homosexual orientation -- about one in three.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_rcc.htm

 

[Hoser]

Tithes are tax deductable. So in a way, indirect support of peeing through tithes accomplishes the same thing.

My brain hurts.


Also, mormons don't have priests.

Also also, they kick you out if you pee through the tithe. I knew a guy who peed through his tie once. I always properly tie my own because of that.

 

[voggmo]

I didn't post a complete article, only parts. & almost ALWAYS post a link despite being told to use some sort of code when doing so.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

But they didn't enforce it Spaceman.

I'll probably regret this, but ... when did they not enforce it?

 

[voggmo]

Page 4 in the article,post 67 which contained a link by the way. Warnings dismissed.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

I didn't post a complete article, only parts. & almost ALWAYS post a link despite being told to use some sort of code when doing so.

You did, actually. Your post was this article in its entirety.

 

[voggmo]

Nope, just a portion. & it was mailed to me with no link. I deliberately deleted the headline to save space. The remaninder was 4 small paragraphs, each one necessary to comprehend said article.

 

[Locutus of Bored]

It goes both ways these public things.


Four San Diego firefighters have won a discrimination lawsuit.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/uploadedImages/Media/Images/Brush%20fire.jpg

Before we changed it there was a hotlinked image and you quoted the article in its entirety in violation of copyright. I believe you've been asked not to do both before.

Also, this article has absolutely nothing to do with the topic.

As far as the church grounds go, they LOOK very public. I've walked through it many times. If one want to get to the Malls, ( well now they're gone), or into downtown area, it's a convenient passway. But private it is even it its open without gates & such.

In SF one finds the complete opposite trend...


WorldNetDaily 8/7/08

Nude men engaged in multiple instances of public sex on a municipal street while police officers, on foot and bicycle, congregated nearby making no attempt to enforce public indecency regulations, according to a report on the latest homosexual-fest in San Francisco [by Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth.]


They featured explicit photographs of oral and anal sex between men and men urinating on each other, among other activities.



At the end of the day the question arises, where would you rather raise your kids? Salt Lake City no doubt.

Again, nothing to do with the thread.

Um, I might point out Heteros are not in the habit of making out on Mormon church grounds. & Miss Chicken peeing on each other is what was considered indecent in SF, not hugs & cheeks kisses. & same sex behavior is by & large considered gross by the masses. It's certainly your prerogative to live the tapeworm & mayo lifestyle, but you shouldn't be surprised or dissapointed when others find it icky. Just the normal reaction to such.

Nonsensical trolling that barely relates to the thread.

Then we're in agreement the peeing thing. Too bad the Ghey/Left don't concur. Yes, most Homosexuals probably don't do the church thing too much, but public restrooms, ( don't tap your foot!), are more common for them. & yes they are all around me. I had a shop teacher when I was 13 that liked groping us minors. Belongs in jail that one.

Comparing gays to pedophiles with more off-topic comments. Trolling again.

Tithes are tax deductable. So in a way, indirect support of peeing through tithes accomplishes the same thing.

Richard Sipe, a psychotherapist and former priest, has studied celibacy, chastity, and sexuality in the priesthood for four decades. He has authored three books on the topic. He once estimated that 30% of the priesthood is homosexually oriented. 5 Elsewhere, he is quoted as estimating that between 25% and 45% of American priests are homosexual in orientation.


Bishop Jerome Listecki is an auxiliary bishop in Chicago. He estimates that "perhaps more than 10%" of priests have a homosexual orientation."(Emphasis ours).

Father Donald Cozzens, an author, psychologist, and Catholic seminary president says that there is such a high percentage of gay priests in the church that he is concerned that “the priesthood is or is becoming a gay profession.” 5 In his book, "The Changing Face of the Priesthood," -- published in the year 2000 -- he estimates that 50% of Roman Catholic priests have a homosexual orientation.

Conclusion: If we assume that all of the estimates are of equal validity, then about 33% of priests have a homosexual orientation -- about one in three.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_rcc.htm

Another off-topic post on your pet subject.

For completely derailing the thread with off-topic anti-gay posts that have no point whatsoever, you've earned yourself an infraction for TROLLING.

Comments to PM.

 

[voggmo]

All offtopic nonsense. Article was entirely ontopic.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Nope, just a portion. & it was mailed to me with no link. I deliberately deleted the headline to save space. The remaninder was 4 small paragraphs.

I can see it, so I don't know why you're lying.

Your original post.

The article.

All of the article was contained in your post. Next time, just take the friendly.

Edit: Or the warning. That works, too.

 

[Jayson]

Why would gay people want to live in Utah? That's like smart people living in Kansas. You know they are there but you also know they aren't really going to fit in or be apreciated for who they are.


Jason

And where exactly is Oklahoma on the food chain, Jason?

Just one step above Kansas and Mississippi. Proably tied with Texas and Alabama in a battle to stay out of the number 48 slot when it comes to dumbest states in America.

Jason