• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Galaxy Map

That's from the book Star Trek Starcharts I do believe. They are probably the best maps of the star trek universe around even if there are a few errors in them.
 
It might be noted that this map was essentially seen onscreen (although out of focus) on several late seventh-season VOY episodes.

That is, this specific graphic was not seen, but most of its Trek features, as well as the artistic layout of the galactic arms, were part of a VOY Astrometrics graphic that gave us a view from the direction of the Delta/Gamma border towards the galactic core and the Beta/Alpha border and depicted the route of the Voyager.

So in that respect, this map, with most of its features and faults (but not those "route of Enterprise" lines, as they weren't in the VOY map), can be considered either canon, or at least as canonical as it gets.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Thanks for that, it looks really good. Does it come any bigger? It's hard to make out some of the details.
 
Such a brilliant book. It's a shame non-fiction Trek books don't sell very well as I'd love to see an update of this with ENT Seasons 2-4 included.
ie showing where the Delphic Expanse is/was
 
Buying the book and getting the sales figures up would probably help in getting the much-needed update, yes. :cool:

I'd argue the Delphic Expanse would be essentially everywhere. It takes about 50 ly to get from Earth to the second Xindi homeworld, but the Expanse is supposed to be 2,000 ly wide, and that certainly won't fit in any of the "unused" nooks or crannies of the current map. Rather, I'd assume that the bulk of the expanse would lie above or below the map plane, but elements of it would protrude between the star systems shown on the map, and would perhaps be partially responsible for keeping many of the players apart from each other originally. I'd certainly insert a major protrusion between Earth and Ferenginar/Cardassia, for example...

Timo Saloniemi
 
Wow I've never seen that. Its far superior to stuff we were seeing in the 90s. Ifor one love non-fiction books and they DID sell well at one time. I hope that updates to the chronology and more will eventually be re-published.

RAMA
 
Yup. But "outer" has traditionally referred to the guesstimate of "25,000-28,000 ly out of 50,000-60,000 outward", and this map complies with the halfway guesstimate. The most modern estimates favor a distance of 26,000 ly and a radius of 50,000.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Wow I've never seen that. Its far superior to stuff we were seeing in the 90s. Ifor one love non-fiction books and they DID sell well at one time. I hope that updates to the chronology and more will eventually be re-published.

RAMA

fat chance. the response from the editors is always "it's online for free, people won't buy the chronology or the encyclopaedia"
 
The one thing I was upset about the book was they did not show the path V-ger took or where the Mutara sector/Mutara nebula is/was. I don't remember if the Doomsday Machine path was shown.
 
Actually, the route of V'Ger is given on the Klingon close-up map on paged 62-63, with speculation that Epsilon 9 was one listening outpost out of a dozen against the Klingon border, and that the path went relatively close past Vulcan and thus allowed Spock to intercept the Enterprise with ease.

The second foldout map suggests that the Mutara nebula would lie in the "lower right" direction, close to Alpha Ceti. I don't agree with that, as a more proximal location would be needed to allow a sublight ship to reach the area in two-three centuries; I think Ceti Alpha is not Alpha Ceti, but rather something like Kappa Ceti A, with the Kappa part dropped because everybody involved would known which Cetus star was under discussion. (Kappa is just a wild guess; I'm sure Cetus would have at least one dim star at a suitable distance and direction.)

The DDM path would be complete speculation on Kirk's and Spock's part, as they only observed a handful of victim systems on what must have been a rather zigzag path. The route is not given, nor is that of the "Operation: Annihilate!" parasites, but the star systems mentioned can be found.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Many other pages from that book can be found online, including a very detailed star map of each quadrant. Look on google images.

I will point out that the arrangement of the stars and nebula are essentially arbitrary. In earlier star maps, these features have appeared in completely different places.

For the few examples I've looked up on it, the separation and placement doesn't seem all that consistent with the episodes.

So there is no correct map. These are just drawn nicely. :)
 
Actually, the real stars in Star Charts are in the exact correct places, as far as modern science can tell. Geoff Mandel's previous work, Star Maps, also had the stars at the correct places relative to Earth as far as that era's science could tell, but he made an error with the orientation of the coordinate grid he used (essentially assuming that the south of Earth's sky was the same as galactic south, even though it points more towards the galactic core) so the two works look different in the 2D view.

The nebulae mentioned in Trek are in turn basically all fictional - there are no impressively glowing, barely hundred-ly-wide clouds in the immediate vicinity of Earth in reality. Where they are to be sprinkled is entirely up to the artist, then.

Timo Saloniemi
 
And that map was done before NASA or one of their orbital telescope spinoff groups announced that they've revised their guesstimates of the structure of the spiral arms earlier this summer. Right?
 
The exact design of the galactic arms is pure art, really. Neither the authors nor NASA have any idea what the arms really look like, because seeing things like that from within one of the arms is too darn difficult. Only some rough ideas of how the arms might be configured on a scale of tens of thousands of lightyears have been revised, and the final truth waits for futuristic technologies and discoveries.

In contrast, the locations of the stars actually listed in the Maps and Charts come from parallax measurements that in the latter case are basically final for any stars that fit within those pages. There's some uncertainty regarding "medium-distant" stars at several thousand lightyears, such as Alpha Cygni, so even Charts is unlikely to be the final word on that. And stars beyond that range are generally beyond the reach of science, too: their parallax is so small as to be undiscernible by modern techniques, so all we can tell about them is their bearing from Earth. But generally, those semi-distant stars in the Milky Way aren't part of the night sky anyway, and don't have names we'd recognize in Trek dialogue.

The placement of fictional stars is arbitrary, of course. Or rather, some 90% of the fictional stars have been placed using the criteria that the travel times derived from episodes make the best possible sense (which isn't always very good sense, due to various internal conflicts). Only about 10% have been sprinkled in at random.

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top