Or you could just let those people worry about it.Given that a certain section of the fandom is demanding it, I think we do.
Future of Paramount+ among merger talks
- Thread starter James Cole
- Start date
"Certain sections of fandom" don't run the property. When studios let that happen, you get the reactionary nature of Star Wars.
Let the studios do what they do. If you don't like what's being made, maybe watch something else. Just because something has "Star Trek" emblazoned on it shouldn't compel anyone to have to watch it. I'll try it and if it doesn't appeal to me, I'll stop watching it. Lots of other things to try.
Eventually, there will be a Star Trek that appeals to you. If not, that's the way it goes, we all can't like everything. All of the creative minds who originated Star Trek are gone. Every new show will reflect a different take on it. Our preferred version is usually the one that introduced us to the franchise (it was just a "series" when I found it). Some people like "galaxy disaster" arcs, some like episodic high concept, others like animated comedies, apparently just about everyone loves shows with call backs and easter eggs, but I personally find that lazy. But, again, I just choose not to watch. These shows don't exist in my world.
Genre franchises spawn a tremendous level of passion that is both fun and dangerous. People are way emotionally involved over TV shows. I get it, I was like that at one time (mostly because they were shelter from a shitty adolescence), but it dissolved more and more with each sequel to the original. But man, you don't see this with the Law and Order franchise. "God, someone oust Dick Wolf already!"
Let the studios do what they do. If you don't like what's being made, maybe watch something else. Just because something has "Star Trek" emblazoned on it shouldn't compel anyone to have to watch it. I'll try it and if it doesn't appeal to me, I'll stop watching it. Lots of other things to try.
Eventually, there will be a Star Trek that appeals to you. If not, that's the way it goes, we all can't like everything. All of the creative minds who originated Star Trek are gone. Every new show will reflect a different take on it. Our preferred version is usually the one that introduced us to the franchise (it was just a "series" when I found it). Some people like "galaxy disaster" arcs, some like episodic high concept, others like animated comedies, apparently just about everyone loves shows with call backs and easter eggs, but I personally find that lazy. But, again, I just choose not to watch. These shows don't exist in my world.
Genre franchises spawn a tremendous level of passion that is both fun and dangerous. People are way emotionally involved over TV shows. I get it, I was like that at one time (mostly because they were shelter from a shitty adolescence), but it dissolved more and more with each sequel to the original. But man, you don't see this with the Law and Order franchise. "God, someone oust Dick Wolf already!"
Trek's future is intertwined with Paramount's (especially given the forthcoming merger with Skydance).
Well, I don't think we need a new thread for every odd piece of news about Paramount that has no explicit Trek connection. I've merged this one with the ongoing Paramount merger thread.
And quicker than the merger with Skydance.
We can probably write off any kind of meaningful 60th anniversary activities because of all this flotsam. Just like the 50th. 
Democratic Senators Warn Paramount’s Shari Redstone That Trump Lawsuit Settlement May Violate Federal Bribery Statute
Three senators have warned Paramount Global's Shari Redstone that a potential settlement of Trump's lawsuit against CBS may violate bribery laws.
deadline.com
If Paramount alters ANY of its programming (be it 60 Minutes, Star Trek, etc.) to comply with Trump's diktats in exchange for approval of the merger with Skydance, Paramount risks being charged with bribery.
Last edited:
I'm surprised no one has posted this yet. This is a couple of days old.
https://www.avclub.com/president-of-cbs-news-wendy-mcmahon-resigns
https://www.avclub.com/president-of-cbs-news-wendy-mcmahon-resigns
“He’s Just Going To Keep Coming Back For More”: Stephen Colbert Mocks Paramount’s Potential Settlement Of Donald Trump’s ‘60 Minutes’ Lawsuit
Stephen Colbert roasts Paramount Global for considering settling with Trump over his $20 billion lawsuit against CBS News.
deadline.com
In medieval times, the court jester was the only person permitted to speak the truth to the King.
It's just as true today.
Paramount, Skydance must scrap DEI to pass FCC’s ‘public interest’ litmus test: sources
Getting rid of so-called DEI will be a prerequisite for any media deal that needs FCC approval, sources tell On The Money.
nypost.com
No more woke shows.
Great news, especially for Star Trek.
One might say in invented "woke".
So...when the studio asked Gene for a more diverse cast in the second pilot was that woke?
'Cause, Trek's done that since the beginning.
Paramount, Skydance must scrap DEI to pass FCC’s ‘public interest’ litmus test: sources
Getting rid of so-called DEI will be a prerequisite for any media deal that needs FCC approval, sources tell On The Money.
No more woke shows.
Great news, especially for Star Trek.
New York Post is a clickbait site filled with Rupert Murdoch’s bullshit.
Senator Warren, of all people (a former professor at Harvard Law School) should know that the whole POINT of a civil suit is to negotiate a settlement out of court (thus avoiding the time, money, and headaches of going to trial).
How she expects Paramount Global to thread the needle without staring down federal bribery charges is beyond me.
I have no doubt that Paramount Global has a team of VERY expensive lawyers at its disposal.
How she expects Paramount Global to thread the needle without staring down federal bribery charges is beyond me.
I have no doubt that Paramount Global has a team of VERY expensive lawyers at its disposal.
Similar threads
