• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Future of Paramount+ among merger talks

He's a clown. I don't follow him or seek his content out, but his videos have crossed my path on several occasions. I can't recall him fluking a single scoop with his "over here at ... we get to speak to a lot of people within the industry" schtick.

A broken clock has a better hit rate.

At one point, he was saying his "sources" were telling him that Sony was going to win out. (Oops!)

I knew Sony wasn't going to make it (he knows nothing about U.S. law).
 
Last edited:

At this point, the "go-shop" is a formality.

Shari Redstone has made her wishes known. Trying to break up Skydance and Paramount is as futile as trying break up a couple that's engaged to be married.
 
Last edited:
So.....for someone who is not an expert on the entertainment industry and too lazy to read this whole Ten page thread, is this merger good or bad for Trek? That is all I care about.
 
So.....for someone who is not an expert on the entertainment industry and too lazy to read this whole Ten page thread, is this merger good or bad for Trek? That is all I care about.
Well, there is a shared history, as Nerys mentions. There's also the fact that it has a year of regulatory review to go through so it won't be finalized until third quarter 2025.

So, who really knows at this point?
 

Apex said it would assume Paramount’s debt totaling approximately $15.8 billion and pay the $400 million breakup fee to the Skydance investor group. Apex also committed to investing approximately $10 billion into Paramount’s working capital post-closing as part of Apex’s business plan for the company. The investment company said its offered purchase price is “contingent on Paramount retaining all its assets through closing (i.e., direct and indirect subsidiaries, affiliates, and material contracts).”

In its offer, Apex “emphasized that its priority in this transaction was to minimize personnel disruption and, to the extent possible, preserve Paramount’s existing workforce, whose efforts will be required to implement Apex’s business plan,” the company said.

Apex Capital Trust is a “multinational holding company and a qualified institutional investor in key finance and fintech sectors,” the New York-based company says. Apex also has developed proprietary technology for phone-to-phone sharing of battery charge and remote phone recharging. In a related investment, Apex Trust has acquired 40% ownership of Simmtronics, a multinational technology company manufacturing phones and other electronic devices.

What is Shari Redstone getting from all this? That's what killed the Skydance deal in June. :shifty:
 
Last edited:

BusinessWire (the original source) has retracted the story. Variety has described the press release as "seemingly bogus".

For now, the Skydance deal is still on track.

According to a report by Bloomberg, (Apex General Counsel) Tatiana Logan said in an emailed statement that the purported offer is superior to the Skydance deal and is contingent on Paramount not selling off any of its subsidiaries. “We are prepared to provide all necessary documentation for comprehensive due diligence,” Logan wrote, according to Bloomberg. “Like most other trusts, Apex Capital Trust is not public facing.”
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top