• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Futurama: Bender's Game

The trailer for "Into the Wild Green Yonder" is available-- Watch it here

20th Century Fox UK has announced a release date of February 23, according to The Futurama Point. That means it will be released several months earlier than the predicted April or May release. No word on when it will be released in the US and Canada, but it should be around the same day.
 
Watch the movie legally, damn it. It's the only way we'll get new Futurama.
I admit, I'm weak and downloaded it, because I have no idea when amazon's actually going to get around to shipping my copy. But hey, it's on order, and is going to be worth every penny once I'm actually charged for it. :techman:
 
Watch the movie legally, damn it. It's the only way we'll get new Futurama.
I admit, I'm weak and downloaded it, because I have no idea when amazon's actually going to get around to shipping my copy. But hey, it's on order, and is going to be worth every penny once I'm actually charged for it. :techman:

I'm the same, but they've got my money, I'm pot-committed with this series, I've got every other Futurama DVD, and I'm going to stroll into town and buy this one today, I don't want to miss the commentary after all.
 
The trailer for "Into the Wild Green Yonder" is available-- Watch it here

20th Century Fox UK has announced a release date of February 23, according to The Futurama Point. That means it will be released several months earlier than the predicted April or May release. No word on when it will be released in the US and Canada, but it should be around the same day.

Who predicted April or May? There is an insert in each movie that displays the release month for each film, and Into the Wild Green Yonder has always said "February 2009"
 
Who predicted April or May? There is an insert in each movie that displays the release month for each film, and Into the Wild Green Yonder has always said "February 2009"
My (R1) copies of the first two didn't have any such insert...
 
meanwhile those grey boxes on YouTube videos are really starting to annoy me.
The button on the bottom right corner of Youtube videos has an option to turn off anotations.


Watching the movie now, but just had to add--

Takei: "Way to kill the franchise, Bakula!"
:guffaw::guffaw::guffaw::guffaw::guffaw:
 
I was somewhat disappointed. It was amusing, but a lot of it fell flat. Too much crude or gross-out humor, too many jokes stretched out too long -- especially that interminable infomercial routine, which went on at least five times longer than it needed to. What is this, Family Guy?

Also, how come Cubert and Dwight are still kids? It's 3008 in-series, isn't it? And unlike The Simpsons, this show has generally reflected the passing of time in its stories. So they should be teenagers by now.

Spoilers:
I didn't care for the way the Nibblonians were used. How can such powerful beings be held captive? I did like the explanation of how Nibbler came to Vergon 6 -- though it seems to conflict with "The Why of Fry," wherein Nibbler said he'd arrange to be transferred from Vergon 6 to Earth in the year 3000. Here it seemed more like a coincidence.

And it seemed wrong that the flashback scenes were only 30-odd years before -- Farnsworth and Wernstrom looked much younger than 130. I guess that was necessary given the boys' ages, though.

Things I liked:
Gynecaladriel. And Leela getting into it with her! Slashfic writers rejoice!

Also, Leela getting turned on by the shock collar. Kinky!

Coed shower scene. Lucky Fry...

Okay, it's not all sex... I liked the Professor/Ignar subplot. Given how similar their head shapes are, I wonder if the producers always had it in mind that Ignar was Farnsworth's son -- though probably not. Anyway, it figures that the stupid one has Fry genes.


The D&D/LOTR and Star Wars stuff was kind of cute, but I prefer it when Futurama does stories that are actually worthwhile SF tales in their own right rather than just being parodies of pop-culture stuff.

Haven't watched the special features yet. Hopefully they're good.
 
Also, how come Cubert and Dwight are still kids? It's 3008 in-series, isn't it? And unlike The Simpsons, this show has generally reflected the passing of time in its stories. So they should be teenagers by now.

Wow, being a giant Futurama nerd, I'm embarrassed to admit I didn't spot that. Yeah, that is kind of annoying. I know its just a silly cartoon, but I kind of like that it has a continuity.
 
I didn't care for the way the Nibblonians were used. How can such powerful beings be held captive?
The Nibblonians aren't really all that powerful. They never have been. Does Scooty Puff Junior ring a bell? Does being defeated by naked guys swinging chairs at them ring a bell? As a race they're no more competent than Zapp Brannigan, really.
 
Ahh, but --

We know from the final moments Bender's Big Score that Nibblonians have the power to escape from any location by swallowing themselves and disappearing. The fact that Nibbler is back in BG proves that's a reversible process. So all those caged Nibblonians should be able to escape easily.

(Ponders the above paragraph)

My god, I'm a nerd...
 
Cubert and Dwight might not be kids, they might be teenagers, just not shown well.

I thought the plot was tighter and a lot better than the last two. I enjoyed it a lot.

I was laughing so hard at the Takai moment. That was one of the best Star Trek moments ever.
 
Sure, it's a cartoon, but one of its main advantages over The Simpsons, IMHO, is that it didn't trap its characters in a perpetual present but allowed them to develop over time. Personally, I think TS would've stayed fresh longer if Bart, Lisa, and Maggie had been allowed to grow and change, get new teachers and classmates, etc. So I don't want to see Futurama abandon its original approach to continuity in favor of something more static.
 
Sure, it's a cartoon, but one of its main advantages over The Simpsons, IMHO, is that it didn't trap its characters in a perpetual present but allowed them to develop over time. Personally, I think TS would've stayed fresh longer if Bart, Lisa, and Maggie had been allowed to grow and change, get new teachers and classmates, etc. So I don't want to see Futurama abandon its original approach to continuity in favor of something more static.

Hear hear. I care about the Futurama universe to an extent that, as a comedy, it probably doesn't. Then again, we might not get that much more of it, so it might never become a problem.
 
I watched the movie today and I enjoyed it. It's definitely the best of the Futurama movies so far. Hopefully the next one will be even better.
 
Oh God, I laughed my ass off! I think I like this one better than Big Score, but only by a little. The "Scary Door" bit nearly killed me. :lol:
 
Well...it was better than Bender's Big Score (which I personally loathed), but worse than Beast With A Billion Backs (which I personally liked). The story was decent, even if it took a long while to get going and the jokes were pretty average.

The Good:
* Even though he was a supporting character in this flick, I think he had the best lines.
* The Bakula comment was hilarious and I didn't realize that George Takei reprised himself for the cameo (the voice sounded like an imitator.
* I did like the revelation that Farnsworth had a son with Mom, even if that plot line was somewhat tacked on.
* Very little Continuity porn. When it was used, it was used wisely.

The Bad:
* The story took forever to get going and many of the plotlines seemed to never fully develop or have any conclusion. Bender in the insane asylum? By the end of the movie, isn't he still insane? Leela's anger "problems?" That was pretty much forgotten.
* Also, the story didn't really have an epic feel to it the way the previous two movies did. Not that that's a bad thing. Many of the Futurama episodes didn't have an epic feel, but for a movie, I guess I just expect more.
* Storyline logic. I still don't get why the Professor needed to devalue all the dark matter. Granted, Mom was abusing the cost of it and the Nibblers captivity wasn't cool, but didn't the universe still bank on the stuff? I'm probably thinking too much about it.
* You know, I see in other forums that people complain about Berman and Co. and the Stargate producers acting like horny teenagers when it comes to women and how they depict them, but it seems that the Futurama writers really have a immature attitude when it comes to women characters and sex. Maybe it is just me, but it seems like they really upped it in the movie, with the Leela/Amy make-out session. I admit, it was funny, but after thinking about it, it seemed somewhat out of character for Leela to do that, especially with Amy (and yes, I know it wasn't the real Amy...still).
* Yellow Submarine. Personally, I didn't like the intro. It wasn't as clever as the one in BwaBB and this one seemed like they wanted to do the bit again.
* The whole fantasy/LotR thing. I remember that this movie was talked up by the producers for being very fantasy based (and the previews seemed to support that), but it was only part of the movie for a very short period of time. Also, it seems completely out of place in this story. The story is moving along in one direction, then - BOOM - we are in a completely new story with superfluous connections to the what came earlier. Also, it was never explained what this place was and why only Fry and Leela seemed to be aware of their lives in the main universe. Didn't care for the segment to the point that I started to doze in the middle of it.
* Can we have one Futurama continuation movie where Bender doesn't go insane or is forced to act out of character for some reason?

Overall, I think I will have to give it a thumbs down. I'll probably watch it again to check out the commentary (those are usually pretty good) and to jot notes for my personal timeline project. Perhaps I'll gain a better appreciation for it.

-----

Christopher
, I am surprised by your continuity comments. Not that I necessarily disagree with you, but I remember we had a debate on the issue when BBS came out and you seemed to take an opposite opinion of what you are indicating now.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top