Thing is, we're not looking at *future* Native Americans when we talk about "Tattoo." We're talking about the past history. And since Star Trek is supposed to be our future, we're talking our past history.
So, according to Star Trek, exodus and I aren't fully human. That is exactly the same argument that the US government used to pursue a program of genocide, which makes what would have been simply a stupid plotline into something rather more offensive.
Actually, I thought I was talking about the Irish.
You responded to exodus's statement that TPTB hadn't bothered with any other ethnicity. You used the Irish as an example of another that had been treated like the American Indian. We have argued that the presentation was different.
You tried to get off "Tattoo" by bringing up Fair Haven.
For what it's worth though when I first saw "Tattoo" I took the episode meaning to be that Native Americans were more than human. Not that that's any better - why should they be different than any other humans foibles and all?
And we have given you a Native American perspective on this.
One would hope that you could see some value in seeing how a member of an ethnicity views its representation, however YMMV on that, too, and most likely does.