And the JJverse Star Trek movies are in the TMP continuity right? lolYou can "LOL" all you want; it doesn't make my statement any less factual.
And the JJverse Star Trek movies are in the TMP continuity right? lolYou can "LOL" all you want; it doesn't make my statement any less factual.
Is that at all confirmed?
And the JJverse Star Trek movies are in the TMP continuity right? lol
Was Mystique always Xavier’s adopted sister?It's still part of the same continuity that began back in 2000 with the first X-Men film.
Dark Phoenix is a remake of The Last Stand.
Was Mystique always Xavier’s adopted sister?
It seems to be missing the entire Hellfire Club subplot and just jumping to Jean being evil and crazy.Rather, it's a new adaptation of the comics storyline that The Last Stand was supposed to be based on but that got shoved to the side in that movie in favor of the mutant cure storyline. This is pure Phoenix Saga, no mutant cure.
Not in the movies in any of the various timelines.No, never. She was Rogue's adoptive mother, and Nightcrawler's biological mother.
So I guess this means Simon Kinberg may end having a very short directorial career.Dark Phoenix might break new ground by being worse than Last Stand. The early buzz is awful, they had to push it back a year for reshoots to fix it and that doesn't seem to have helped. I've seen reviews that call it laughably bad.
And I wondered why Raven took such a special interest in Kurt in Apocalypse that she would personally escort him to Xavier's. The timeline adds up-- She leaves with Azazel (Kurt's father in the comics) in 1962, and she shows unusual interest in a teenaged mutant that resembles both of them in Apocalypse 21 years later.The Nightcrawler connection was hinted at in X2.
So I guess this means Simon Kinberg may end having a very short directorial career.
Was Mystique always Xavier’s adopted sister?
I hate that you're right about this.He's a straight white dude. He'll probably just end up becoming the next David S. Goyer (not counting his legit great comics work like his JSA run)/Zak Penn/Akiva Goldsman/Scott Buck/Uwe Boll/Paul W. S. Anderson and constantly fail upwards with a key assist from the international box office.
It’s really not. It’s a huge retcon.Yes. We just weren't aware of it prior to First Class; that's how an evolving shared universe works.
Please, I saw every movie in theaters. I wanted them to be good and make sense, but for the most part they didn't. Don't insult me by claiming I hate them because I find them to be an absolute mess. I've loved these characters since I was 8 and that's why I still want to see a faithful version of them on screen.Deadpool can mock whatever he wants; it does not take a "Herculean effort" to accept the reality of the XMCU being a nineteen-year franchise comprising two timelines within a single overarching continuity.
The only reason people get their noses bent out of joint over and exaggerate the extent to which the series' in-universe narrative symmetry holds together is because they dislike the franchise.
It seems to be missing the entire Hellfire Club subplot and just jumping to Jean being evil and crazy.
Not in the movies in any of the various timelines.
I'd prefer quality to quantity, but to each their own. I no longer wish to be told I hate a franchise because I'm not willing to accept shit and call it brilliant. I'm willingness to waste my time with you has come to an end.^ If you don't think that the majority of the franchise has been good, you, by definition, dislike it, and I have only ever seen those who don't like certain aspects or elements of the films complain about how the franchise's internal in-universe narrative is full of errors, holes, or flaws.
Deadpool can mock whatever he wants; it does not take a "Herculean effort" to accept the reality of the XMCU being a nineteen-year franchise comprising two timelines within a single overarching continuity.
The only reason people get their noses bent out of joint over and exaggerate the extent to which the series' in-universe narrative symmetry holds together is because they dislike the franchise.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/legion-season-2-preview-1099278Asked if there were any corporate issues preventing Logan star Patrick Stewart from appearing as Xavier on the show, Hawley said he was hopeful such an appearance would work out so that David could meet his father.
“It’s not a rights issue or a legal issue, it’s more about corporate synergy," said Hawley. "There are a lot of people with opinions and strategies for franchise development. But I think we’ll be victorious in the end because our hearts are pure.”
Hawley was also open to other versions of Xavier besides Stewart’s. “We move around a lot in time with the show. I haven’t really settled on which version we’ll see,” he said.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.