Here's one:
D-3 Class Cruiser - Gavasta'Hegh "Death Bird" by P.T. Riley
The centerbody is too wide at the front, plus it has two torpedo tubes up front
Here's one:
D-3 Class Cruiser - Gavasta'Hegh "Death Bird" by P.T. Riley
That looks pretty neat, but the engines are backwards.
The engines are correct. It's the rear hull and wings that are backwards.
They are now ... take a second look at Clawhammer's 8/21/2009 posting.
The engines are correct. It's the rear hull and wings that are backwards.
They are now ... take a second look at Clawhammer's 8/21/2009 posting.
Okay...
I guess I didn't see that earlier version...
==================================================
"What do you mean the engines are on backwards?!"
"Well then Full Speed Astern, you son of a motherless targ!!!"
Since I'm not sure if what I said was exactly clear regarding the with of the centerbody at the front of the wing and the rear of the wing
![]()
Note the red lines. Basically I want the mid-section of the wing to be widened out at the front to where the red line is on the front (on both sides obviously), and narrowed down to where the red-lines are on the back (on both sides obviously)
CuttingEdge100
To make that work, you might try reversing the center rear hull, but still keep the wings swept forward...
I could ***MAYBE*** come up with something using some of Vance's stuff as a base. The result would be a Forward Swept Wing version of a classic D-7, not a K'Tinga...
I manip'ed the K'Tinga plans from the Star Trek: Fact Files to get this:
![]()
I manip'ed the K'Tinga plans from the Star Trek: Fact Files to get this:
http://www.starscape.org.uk/trekbbs/fsw_ktinga2.png
Now that looks awesome![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It's about the same wingspan (nacelle-to-nacelle) as the K'Tinga, but since the centre-body is narrower that makes each wing proportionally wider.- Wingspan appears a bit too large compared to the standard D-7/K'Tinga, granted in my drawing I kind of made that drawing error too, but you seemed to have further accentuated it.
That's because I compressed the centre-body to get the width as requested.- The shape of the front of the centerbody has too much "curve" to it. Needs to be flatter
- The surface detail on the centerbody is too high. The surface detail/deflector-gridding seems too "compressed"
Well, there is some back-sweep to the pylons and the forward edge of the pylons attach at the same point as on the K'Tinga.- Pylons don't have any sweep-back and the nacelle appears to have been moved further aft on the pylon
It definitely has that blueprint look about it though, which I like.
The Real Foxbat,
Tell me if and when you plan to proceed with the drawing
It's about the same wingspan (nacelle-to-nacelle) as the K'Tinga, but since the centre-body is narrower that makes each wing proportionally wider.
That's because I compressed the centre-body to get the width as requested.
Ok, I guess you'd like some modifications made...![]()
The Real Foxbat,
Tell me if and when you plan to proceed with the drawing
Umm... Right now...
I'm still the noobest of the noob at this sort of thing, so it takes me a while...
I wasn't sure which approach to take on this...
In this drawing I reduced the width on the front of the engineering hull to keep the width of the warp nacelles the same...
![]()
In this drawing I maintained the width on the front of the engineering hull and expanded the rear of the engineering hull to fit the wings...
![]()
Both drawings based on Vance's Klingon D-7 over at Pixel Sagas...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.