I'm sure that Sherlock exists for reasons other than annoying Doctor Who fans.
After The Abominable Bride, I'm not so sure about that anymore

I'm sure that Sherlock exists for reasons other than annoying Doctor Who fans.
This is how I feel. The longer break would be fine if it meant they would be starting fresh with a new Doctor and a new companion. They could treat it like a new series.I wouldn't mind the year+ breather if it meant the show returned from its sabbatical completely refreshed (like they did with the soft relaunch for series 5). But no, we have to wait until 2017 for yet another lackluster Moffat series.
Well, Moffat himself did promise to shorten gaps between seasons, it was the justification he gave for doing a split season back in season 6. And since making that promise the gap between seasons has been increased three times. Regardless whose decision it was, it's still a broken promise.^It sounds to me like the people responsible for the longer gap are the BBC execs, not Moffat personally.
According to RTD, BBC wasn't very enthused about the 2009 specials since, believe it or not, they had to put more money on the line for them than they would have had a regular season been done. So it doesn't really surprise me they're not going that route again.Would've been nice to have had a tv movie season like Tennant's final year,
Well, Moffat himself did promise to shorten gaps between seasons, it was the justification he gave for doing a split season back in season 6. And since making that promise the gap between seasons has been increased three times. Regardless whose decision it was, it's still a broken promise.
Did he actually say "I promise" or "I guarantee" or the equivalent, or did he just express it as an intention? When the decision is not entirely within one person's ability to control, there's no sense in blaming that one person if things don't work out the way they planned. All they can do is try their best.
^It sounds to me like the people responsible for the longer gap are the BBC execs, not Moffat personally.
I don't mind honestly. As much as I love Peter Capaldi (while wishing he had better material to work with), I've found myself needing a break from the show because I'm just not as engaged as I once was.
I admit I'm looking at this from an American perspective, where television series bring on new producers without causing massive hitches in production. I know British television is a different beast, but it seems weird to me that the BBC couldn't line up a producer for a one or two year run to bridge the gap between Moffat and Chibnall.
(This has been brought up at Outpost Gallifrey. The response this gets is usually something like, "There aren't that many producers in Britian who are Doctor Who fans. And why would a non-fan take on Doctor Who?" Those answers feel made up to me. There's truthiness to them, but not necessarily truth.)
It's odd that a Doctor Who Christmas Special was a non-concept during the Classic Series...
Yeah... I've been rewatching Classic Who lately and I'm nearing the end of the Hartnell era. In season 3, they went through three producers in one year -- Verity Lambert left, John Wiles took over but clashed badly with Hartnell, so he left after a few serials and Innes Lloyd took over. Back then, they had no trouble changing staffers -- or cast members -- on a dime. There was very little advance planning.
It's a totally ridiculous idea. You don't have to be a fan of something to do it well. I mean, when a show starts out, it doesn't have any fans, because nobody's seen it. The people who come in and write for it at the start, who establish the things that make the fans love it in the first place, are doing it because they're professionals who need to make a living. Heck, Innes Lloyd didn't want to produce Doctor Who -- he didn't even like science fiction -- but he oversaw the entire Patrick Troughton era and is seen as the one who largely defined the successful formula for the series from then on. Nicholas Meyer wasn't a Star Trek fan, but he directed or co-wrote three of the most beloved movies in the franchise.
I think a lot of fans don't understand that what's a hobby for them is a profession for the people who actually make these things. For a professional, caring about the work you do is a matter of professional pride and commitment, not just recreational affinity. So it doesn't matter if you were previously a fan of the series you're working on. If it's your professional responsibility, then you care about doing it well. And creating is not the same as consuming. There are plenty of people who make television but rarely watch television. They're too busy making it, and when they do get free time, they prefer not to be reminded of their work. So being a fan and being an effective creator have nothing to do with each other.
Unless you count "The Feast of Steven."
I think it might be a good thing. A little break will help to refresh Doctor Who and will be great to have it back at Easter where the ratings could be much higher with no X Factor or Strictly.
It's a totally ridiculous idea. You don't have to be a fan of something to do it well. I mean, when a show starts out, it doesn't have any fans, because nobody's seen it. The people who come in and write for it at the start, who establish the things that make the fans love it in the first place, are doing it because they're professionals who need to make a living. Heck, Innes Lloyd didn't want to produce Doctor Who -- he didn't even like science fiction -- but he oversaw the entire Patrick Troughton era and is seen as the one who largely defined the successful formula for the series from then on. Nicholas Meyer wasn't a Star Trek fan, but he directed or co-wrote three of the most beloved movies in the franchise.
I think a lot of fans don't understand that what's a hobby for them is a profession for the people who actually make these things. For a professional, caring about the work you do is a matter of professional pride and commitment, not just recreational affinity. So it doesn't matter if you were previously a fan of the series you're working on. If it's your professional responsibility, then you care about doing it well. And creating is not the same as consuming. There are plenty of people who make television but rarely watch television. They're too busy making it, and when they do get free time, they prefer not to be reminded of their work. So being a fan and being an effective creator have nothing to do with each other.
Unless you count "The Feast of Steven."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.