Re: fMRI shows some in "persistent vegetative state" - are *conscious*
And, of course, in "locked-in syndrome" a person is fully and completely aware and their body is working pretty much on its own. The person just has no control over any meaningful portion of their body. "Locked-in syndrome" can be caused by any number of factors from pretty-fucking-serious scurvy, exposure to toxins, and stuff like that. But the fact with that is that the person "locked in" doesn't have brain damage. Something just interupting/preventing the signals from the brain getting to the rest of the body.
This is completely different than a person who's gone without oxygen for a period of time or suffered a massive brain injury where actual brain tissue has been lost or destroyed. There's no recovery from that if a signifcant portion has been destroyed. Sure, there's people who have chunks of their brain removed and those people end up, more-or-less, better-off afterwards and are capable of living something close to a life but only because a functional portion of their brain remains.
In Teri's case her brain was so damaged that her body lacked the very ability to even run itself without help from machines. Teri was incapable of thinking or feeling for herself and the "reactions" she had to the TV and family members in the room was no different than your dog perking it's head up because it hears your voice. Worse than that, Teri was unlikely capable of hearing that voice, understanding it and getting any confort from it. She was beyond gone. I remember when her case was going on have long discussions about her with another poster here (He Who Shalt Not Be Named) who felt that because Teri was able to inhale and exhale and process IV solutions into urine and her eyes reacted to noise in the room she should be allowed to live. Countless CTs and MRIs showed that.
I wouldn't call such an existence "living." There was no "thought" in Teri's mind, she was little more than a completely reactionary being functioning on only the most simple and basic of brain activity. What happened to her was sad, what's even sadder is that her family let "Teri" suffer in such a manner for their own comfort and pleasure. If there's a such thing as a human soul, God and that stuff then they were locking Teri's within her preventing the "real" Teri the one who'd presumably be able to experience and enjoy an afterlife into a useless body that her soul couldn't use to even think.
And, of course, in "locked-in syndrome" a person is fully and completely aware and their body is working pretty much on its own. The person just has no control over any meaningful portion of their body. "Locked-in syndrome" can be caused by any number of factors from pretty-fucking-serious scurvy, exposure to toxins, and stuff like that. But the fact with that is that the person "locked in" doesn't have brain damage. Something just interupting/preventing the signals from the brain getting to the rest of the body.
This is completely different than a person who's gone without oxygen for a period of time or suffered a massive brain injury where actual brain tissue has been lost or destroyed. There's no recovery from that if a signifcant portion has been destroyed. Sure, there's people who have chunks of their brain removed and those people end up, more-or-less, better-off afterwards and are capable of living something close to a life but only because a functional portion of their brain remains.
In Teri's case her brain was so damaged that her body lacked the very ability to even run itself without help from machines. Teri was incapable of thinking or feeling for herself and the "reactions" she had to the TV and family members in the room was no different than your dog perking it's head up because it hears your voice. Worse than that, Teri was unlikely capable of hearing that voice, understanding it and getting any confort from it. She was beyond gone. I remember when her case was going on have long discussions about her with another poster here (He Who Shalt Not Be Named) who felt that because Teri was able to inhale and exhale and process IV solutions into urine and her eyes reacted to noise in the room she should be allowed to live. Countless CTs and MRIs showed that.
I wouldn't call such an existence "living." There was no "thought" in Teri's mind, she was little more than a completely reactionary being functioning on only the most simple and basic of brain activity. What happened to her was sad, what's even sadder is that her family let "Teri" suffer in such a manner for their own comfort and pleasure. If there's a such thing as a human soul, God and that stuff then they were locking Teri's within her preventing the "real" Teri the one who'd presumably be able to experience and enjoy an afterlife into a useless body that her soul couldn't use to even think.