If DS9 gets destroyed, I'm done with Trek Lit forever. Seriously. Just saying. That would be an unforgivable sin, IMHO.
And . . . OMG . . . why do Klingons have turtle shells on their heads!?!
DS9 is pretty old it getting replaced is not a surprise.
It's also a fair sight easier for the USAF to get replacement parts from Boeing than it would be for Starfleet to get them from Cardassian defense contractors, though.Actually, it is. A space station like that should be able to last more than four decades. I mean, hell, the Pentagon still plans on using the B-52 bomber into the 2040s, when they'll be 90 years old. You'd think a space station could last longer.
Actually, it is. A space station like that should be able to last more than four decades. I mean, hell, the Pentagon still plans on using the B-52 bomber into the 2040s, when they'll be 90 years old. You'd think a space station could last longer.
It's also a fair sight easier for the USAF to get replacement parts from Boeing than it would be for Starfleet to get them from Cardassian defense contractors, though.![]()
Had Terok Nor stayed a mining station, a longer lifespan would be expected. But the station's gone through several wars, been extensively modified, and moved about in space in ways it wasn't designed for. The station can only take so much stress...
And on top of all that, the station isn't dealing with the constant stress of being in an atmosphere.
And on top of all that, the station isn't dealing with the constant stress of being in an atmosphere.
Conversely, an atmosphere can protect a structure from the micrometeorite bombardment and radiation damage it would get in deep space. Although I assume you're comparing DS9 to a structure on the ground, because in Bajor orbit it would've only been immersed in the most tenuous outer layers of atmosphere at most.
However since Terok Nor was built as an ore processing station and to oversee the occupation of Bajor, it was not designed for wormhole monitoring and defense as well as to serve as a commercial hub. It was also no doubt designed to serve primarily Cardassian vessels whereas now that sector serves primarily Federation vessels.
I can't imagine needing a major Starfleet on the other side of the wormhole. A monitoring station and small depot, maybe. But why build a major facility minutes away from the existing one?
I can't imagine needing a major Starfleet on the other side of the wormhole. A monitoring station and small depot, maybe. But why build a major facility minutes away from the existing one?
Can anyone read the registry of (possibly) the Robinson on the cover of Plagues of Night? It looks like 71842:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/145164955X/ref=dp_image_z_0?ie=UTF8&n=266239&s=books
Where have we seen it - and perhaps more importantly, with which ship was it? (If it was the Enterprise-D, then that means that due to scaling it must've been rebuilt/replaced with a suspiciously similar counterpart at some point after the TOS movies, which makes it hard to put an age on it. If it was some point on DS9 that I'm forgetting, that might not be the case.)As far as the station being old and needing to be replaced, what about Earth Spacedock? That facility is older than DS9 and still in use so we have an in-universe study showing aging stations can still be useful.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.