This is a whopper of a conspiracy theory but a fun one to ponder. I'm sure the Royal family isn't pleased with this film on the heels of William and Kate's marriage.
Huffington
Huffington
Film portrays British Royals as racists and psychopaths
- Thread starter DarthTom
- Start date
"Fayed, the billionaire former owner of London's Harrods department store, funded the 2.5 million pound ($4 million) documentary."
That's basically all you need to know - it's a part of his ongoing lunacy. How he roped Allen into it, I can't imagine...
(Long story short, Fayed *has* to keep going with the conspiracy bullshit because his companies employed the driver, Henri Paul, which means a) he's probably trying to work off guilt at getting his son killed and b) if ever he just publicly accepts that, he presumably becomes liable for corporate manslaughter should the Spencer family feel like it...)
That's basically all you need to know - it's a part of his ongoing lunacy. How he roped Allen into it, I can't imagine...
(Long story short, Fayed *has* to keep going with the conspiracy bullshit because his companies employed the driver, Henri Paul, which means a) he's probably trying to work off guilt at getting his son killed and b) if ever he just publicly accepts that, he presumably becomes liable for corporate manslaughter should the Spencer family feel like it...)
And, let's face it, if SIS had done it, they'd have staged a suicide, nice and neat, a la Dr David Kelly. Or just shot Dodi.
Yea, Fayed sure does have a hard on for the Royals.
Actually I think this is a decent conspiracy theory because it kills two birds with one stone. Firstly, Diana struggled with the paparazzi press during her entire adult life after marrying Charles and the car crash that was directly caused by their endless pursuits made them the proverbial bad guys with the public.
They could probably do this without some stupid Diana conspiracy. Seriously, people need to give that a rest.
Which is ironic, because all guilt lies with those motherfucking Paparazzi.
They wouldn't exist if people didn't eat the shit up like cotton candy and buy the publications they snap photos of these folks.
Says the guy with an obsession with the royal family.
Be honest, you have every copy of People Magazine and US Weekly dealing with the royals.You mean people like you?
Says the guy with an obsession with the royal family.
Actually you're wrong, I do not. I've never been a collector of shit and if I were to, the Royals wouldn't be even in the top 100 on my list.
Krugerrands or bearer bonds however might be.
Says the guy with an obsession with the royal family.
Actually you're wrong, I do not. I've never been a collector of shit and if I were to, the Royals wouldn't be even in the top 100 on my list.
Okay, maybe you don't collect them, but you've started numerous threads relating to various members of the Royal Family (something like seven or eight over the past several months) that discuss gossip on them, the wedding, etc. It just seemed an odd complaint to criticize the people "eating that shit up" for fueling the paparazzi that contributed to Diana's death when from all appearances you seem to be one of the people lining up to eat.
I think you misunderstood, I wasn't in any way exempting myself from the legions of folks who eat up the paparazzi's buillshit related to the Royal family - I'm guilty as charged in that regard.
For the record, I won't pay for it though - only the free stuff on the net.
I know this is kinda shitty, but while Diana did an overall fantastic job of freeing her boys from the stodginess of royal life (where they wouldn’t have to be as unhappy as their father, say), would things have gone as well for them had she not died? Basically, was the public and political (not personal and emotional) fallout from her death ultimately beneficial to their well-being?
I said it sounds shitty, but the loss of a loved mother of two young sons aside, would they have been left alone as much as they were but for her premature death?
Still sounds shitty no matter how I try to non-emotionally phrase it. Does anybody understand what I’m trying to get at?
I said it sounds shitty, but the loss of a loved mother of two young sons aside, would they have been left alone as much as they were but for her premature death?
Still sounds shitty no matter how I try to non-emotionally phrase it. Does anybody understand what I’m trying to get at?
Did anyone else see that pod underneath the Fiat's wing?
You know what I'm thinking?
That's right, the British Secret service contacted the CIA, who hooked them up with Al Queda and gave them a pod... bomb.. missile thing.
Lyndon B Johnson probably had something to do with it too.
My theory's still a little incomplete, but so far, it's looking bulletproof.
You know what I'm thinking?
That's right, the British Secret service contacted the CIA, who hooked them up with Al Queda and gave them a pod... bomb.. missile thing.
Lyndon B Johnson probably had something to do with it too.
My theory's still a little incomplete, but so far, it's looking bulletproof.