That's the essential purpose of this thread.If there WAS, the episode doesn't happen.
That's the essential purpose of this thread.If there WAS, the episode doesn't happen.
That's the essential purpose of this thread.
Spock's Brain.I said I would, and now I have.
Fury
Elderley Kes transwarps her little shuttle all the way from Ocampa to USS Voyager about 35kly away, boards it by crashing, touches the warp core and uses it to transport herself six years back in time... as well as 35kly back the other way in space again. She then disguises her old self as her young self while sedating her actual young self, and concocts a plan to betray the ship to the Vidiians to allow her young self to be transported back to Ocampa.
What the hell?!
How does Kes find Voyager again? How does touching the warp core send her back in time and space? How does she control that? If she still has the ability to hyperwarp that distance at will, why after coming to her senses does she not give the ship another push the rest of the way to Earth? Why doesn't she go all the way back to Caretaker and stop her young self ever leaving in the first place. Why doesn't she meet up with either of the Nacene to help hone her abilities and slow her ageing? Also, since when can you not change direction at warp speed?
Not only does this episode trash a beloved character, it doesn't make any sense!
Latent Image
The Doctor has a repressed memory of Ensign Ahni Jetal, whom he allowed to while keeping Harry Kim alive, seemingly just because the latter was closer to him socially. It's a fascinating character study, but there's one niggling flaw:
Was it really necessary for Jetal to be unpersoned entirely? This entails not just erasing the EMH's memory, but also removing any trace of her from the ship's logs and forbidding mention of her by the rest of the crew. Given that the crux of the Doctor's madness was the equality of injury between Jetal and Kim, it would have been much simpler to say that Jetal was actually injured worse (perhaps shot twice instead of once, or standing closer to the gun?). It could even have been argued that Kim took priority because he was a bridge officer and therefore had priority over a lower deck grunt. Janeway's solution strikes me as greatly excessive.
Maneuvers
This one doesn't come down to any single specific flaw so much as death by a thousand small cuts. Seska gets through Voyager's shields because she remembers their access codes - didn't the remaining officers think to change the passwords in the months since she fled? Two Kazon infiltrators steal transporter parts - how does stealing parts from one transporter break all the others on the ship (including shuttles), and how do they beam themselves away after they've sabotaged the system? At the end Janeway successfully kidnaps a group of Kazon Majes and trades them for Chakotay, but doesn't think to ask for Seska's custody as well. There are probably a few others I've forgotten but basically the whole episode is a long chain of "because the plot demanded it" contrivances.
Do you have any suggestions? They don't all have to be from VOY, or even Star Trek as a whole.
I think I could make an argument that “Caretaker” has a HUGE plot hole, since it seems Starfleet doesn’t have any explosives that work on timers. Use the Caretaker’s array to send Voyager home, but before leaving plant explosives with timers on the array. Problem solved and the series never happens.
I think I could make an argument that “Caretaker” has a HUGE plot hole, since it seems Starfleet doesn’t have any explosives that work on timers. Use the Caretaker’s array to send Voyager home, but before leaving plant explosives with timers on the array. Problem solved and the series never happens.
It's presented at the end like a choice between getting home right now or saving the Ocampa, but it's a bit more complicated than that. The system to send them back to Federation space would take hours to activate and they're in the middle of a space battle, with Kazon reinforcements on the way. They'd already lost one ship in the fight and if they'd stuck around and continued fighting there was a good chance they'd lose everything.I think I could make an argument that “Caretaker” has a HUGE plot hole, since it seems Starfleet doesn’t have any explosives that work on timers. Use the Caretaker’s array to send Voyager home, but before leaving plant explosives with timers on the array. Problem solved and the series never happens.
For me the answer to the threat is Rascals.
Voyager’s “Scorpion” never made sense to me. The entire two-parter hinges on Janeway’s ability to blackmail the Borg into a temporary alliance by offering something that the Borg couldn’t figure out on their own.
Adapting to things has been the Borg’s entire bag since they were first introduced. It never made any sense to me that The Doctor could come up with Borg nanoprobes that would be effective against Species 8472, but the billions of minds working together in the collective couldn’t.
I think I could make an argument that “Caretaker” has a HUGE plot hole, since it seems Starfleet doesn’t have any explosives that work on timers. Use the Caretaker’s array to send Voyager home, but before leaving plant explosives with timers on the array. Problem solved and the series never happens.
So it's better to kill millions of adults than to practice birth control?
With those two assumptions, abortion (or even contraception) becomes the ultimate miscarriage of justice, but war and capital punishment are both perfectly acceptable.
My chief issue is that the Borg slaughtered pretty much all of Zephram Cochrane's ground crew... and nothing in history changed. Like none of those engineering pioneers had anything to do with the creation of Starfleet, the construction of the Warp 5 engine, or were anyone's ancestor
So let’s get the obvious elephant in the room out of the way: how the hell did the aliens get enough space on their planet to build an entire replica of the ship, much less know every single nook and cranny about the interior, right down to little things like personal items? If it was just a one-room holodeck or something, that would have made at least a little more sense. And for what? Just to confuse Kirk? And if they had such a problem with overpopulation, wouldn’t there not be enough food to go around, or even space to have sex and conceive children?
Encounter at Farpoint basically describes the holodeck as using replicator techology to create some of the scenery (like snow or a piece of paper someone might walk out holding), which means it also uses replicator technology to recycle it. If the holodeck breaks then it could presumably end up recycling people."The Big Goodbye" - So, you turn off the holodeck, and that can wipe out any actual living person still inside?
While the episode is fun and good, you have to suspend disbelief pretty hard to watch.
(Sort of like LOST... I never watched before now because I found the entire idea of over 70 people surviving a plane breaking apart in midair and crashing the most ridiculous thing I had ever heard. I could never get past that idea in the first place to even bother.)
What do they actually say in the movie about casualties from the attack? I can't remember.
Encounter at Farpoint basically describes the holodeck as using replicator techology to create some of the scenery (like snow or a piece of paper someone might walk out holding), which means it also uses replicator technology to recycle it. If the holodeck breaks then it could presumably end up recycling people.
Also a big theme in Lost is whether the bizarre things that keep happening are caused by something scientifically explainable or by something supernatural, so if the plane crash is too unbelievable it probably won't be your kind of series.
Don't forget 5) The whole concept basically means that people can use the transporter to gain effective immortality. When you start to get old, take a trip through the transporter and rewind the clock back to age 12. Repeat indefinitely.
Well, that's been true since Unnatural Selection, if not Counterclock Incident...
You know that, and I know that, and probably the overwhelming majority of the leaders of the patriarchalist, sexist reactionaries seeking to criminalize not only abortion but contraception know that.Contraception (contra = against, caption = conception) is not equivalent to abortion.
Logic and practical information do not seem to apply here.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.