• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Enterprise Restoration Blog Update 1/2016

And there will be some way to activate the lights - but not on demand from visitors, only when something special occurs.
Well people are going to want to see it lit up. Hopefully they can light it up 10 minutes each hour or something like that. Not once a month or however they determine what the "special occasion" is.
 
Why rotate the lights when you can flash them in a sequence?

no the lights stay put..the caps themselves rotate like the original model did....at least thats what a lot of us would like to see...there are kits for the 1/350th scale models that have just leds that make it look as if they are rotating...doesn't look great.
 
Search4, do you know if the led lit nacelle caps will have motorized rotation?

the impression I got from a recent article made it seem like they will not spin.
I thought the article specified, but it's actually a little unclear:
'Conservator Ariel O’Connor explains, “Although the original nacelle dome lights did not survive, we can replicate the original effect in a way that is safe to install on the model. The LED lights can be programmed to match the original VFX footage while eliminating the burnt-out bulbs, extreme heat, and motor problems that troubled the original lights. It is a wonderful solution to re-light the nacelles while ensuring the model’s safety and longevity.”'

The underlined segments imply that the lights will appear to spin, but maybe I'm inferring too much.
Edit: The Popular Mechanics article does make it more clear:
'The warp nacelles don't have their original electronic innards anyway. Once, a motor inside deflected light, giving the appearance of movement inside. Now, LED lights will be added, and a microcontroller will help get the look just right to replicate the motor, all without moving parts.'
 
I don't mind LED's being used for interior lighting, marker lights and the like, even to replace the "Christmas lights" in the front of the engines. In my mind, there has to be the rotating fan blades in the engines. I don't see how blinking, spinning LED's, how ever controlled, will ever look right. Time will tell, I guess.
 
Let me chime in on that - I'm on the restoration team.

Ed did fabulous and world class work restoring the structural integrity of the model. And it was falling apart, after being hung from the ceiling (which it was NOT designed to do). He had a very limited period of time to do the work (2-3 months, versus this restoration having taking over a year) and did not have access to any of the paint analysis or microscope-analysis type tools now in use. Nor did he have access to detailed photos like we have now.

The weathering he applied is 100% accurate but indeed, too heavy. We have behind the scenes photos that prove that. There are issues releasing the photos, because Smithsonian must follow the copyright rules, but we have essentially every photo done and the weathering is accurate. It did not show up well on the TV screen, though. The grid lines are also present, but yes, completely agree, far too heavy.

Thank you for that.
 
So does anyone have the latest updates on how the restoration is going and when we can expect to see completion?
 
She's scheduled to be put back in the 20th of June but will be covered until a press event a few days later. Definitely on display July 1 which is the 40th anniversary of the building.
Thank you! I hadn't seen any updates from the Smithsonian on it yet. Trying to plan a DC trip around it. :D
 
While Trek fan criticism is pretty famous, I think most will be pleased. And we're out of the gift shop!!
 
While Trek fan criticism is pretty famous, I think most will be pleased. And we're out of the gift shop!!

Have you seen the restoration? If so can you give us any details? Does the LED lighting on the nacelle caps match the original look?
 
Speaking of restorations of Sci-Fi TV artifacts, there's this just released video of the restoration of the horribly treated Gemini 12 from the original Lost in Space pilot.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
While we're waiting I have restored another Enterprise pic.

pilot%20restored.jpg


:)Spockboy
 
Speaking of restorations of Sci-Fi TV artifacts, there's this just released video of the restoration of the horribly treated Gemini 12 from the original Lost in Space pilot.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Thanks for that! I knew there was a different ship for the pilot and the Jupiter II was based on it but never knew what became of it. Glad to see it was found and restored to it's original condition! :techman:
 
As MarsWeeps stated, Thank you, Maurice for that fascinating video! I maintain that the Red Rock Canyon location sequences are some of the most impressive miniature shots ever filmed. They hold up even today when nearly all material has done "digital". That one particular shot where the saucer casts a shadow through the vapor/smoke laden atmosphere is just mind blowing!

I read the "horror story" of the two ship models "butchered" for "City Beneath the Sea", but I had no idea someone (with the proper skills) got the chance to properly restore it. Funny enough, I remember an early issue of "StarLog" that mentioned the auction of the Gemini 12. It even printed a photo of the saucer resting beside the flying sub. If not the same photo in the video, it was one staged from a similar angle.

Though he's certainly under no obligation to do so, I'm glad the owner is willing to publicly display the restored model.

Sincerely,

Bill
 
Funny enough, I remember an early issue of "StarLog" that mentioned the auction of the Gemini 12. It even printed a photo of the saucer resting beside the flying sub. If not the same photo in the video, it was one staged from a similar angle.

The relevant Starlog page is online here:

https://archive.org/stream/starlog_magazine-039/039#page/n9/mode/2up

It's a great picture, but we learned a lot more from the video. Like the fact that the saucer sold the following day. And I'd always wondered about the weird thing seen inside the windows. It's a light diffuser that someone stuck in there? Now that I think about it, I'll bet that was added for City Beneath the Sea, and the first restorer just left it in there.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top