• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

ENTERPRISE design in the new film? (How many changes?)

ancient said:The Mona Lisa was a man, baby!
Renaissance transvestites? YIKES!
In any case, I agree Vektor, hell, I probably won't notice any minor changes they make either, even though I'm a fan. I think Cary's example is a good one to combine with yours. After all, asking 10 people to describe the Mona Lisa will probably yield 10 different results too. "What kind of clothes is she wearing?" "What's in the background?"

In that sense, creating a similar forgery would fool most people. Putting a race car in the background to make it a kweler painting that appeals to hip teens though...yeah, people'll know it's not genuine.

That was actually sort of my point in saying this:
We, and pretty much the whole freakin' WORLD, know what the USS Enterprise, NCC-1701, looks like. Not everyone knows where frame stanchion X-42-J9243_QQ-34 is... ... but virtually anyone you run into on the street (even those who HATE Star Trek) will recognize the original ship.
:thumbsup:
 
I'd wager that if you showed your avatar to any 10 people on the street and asked "Is this the Enterprise from the 60's Star Trek show?" at least half would say "yes."
 
I want the hull to be luminescent. By the 23rd century they shouldn't need big spot lights to light up a ship in the dark of space. The hull should light itself up.
 
Guartho said:
I'd wager that if you showed your avatar to any 10 people on the street and asked "Is this the Enterprise from the 60's Star Trek show?" at least half would say "yes."

In court, that's called 'leading the witness'.
 
I didn't even like the TMP change. Why change it. God is in the details. The devils only in the details when you change them.
 
ancient said:
Guartho said:
I'd wager that if you showed your avatar to any 10 people on the street and asked "Is this the Enterprise from the 60's Star Trek show?" at least half would say "yes."

In court, that's called 'leading the witness'.

That's okay if the witness is hostile, as the people on the street would likely become if you stopped them to ask Star Trek questions.
 
Samuel T. Cogley said:
ancient said:
Guartho said:
I'd wager that if you showed your avatar to any 10 people on the street and asked "Is this the Enterprise from the 60's Star Trek show?" at least half would say "yes."

In court, that's called 'leading the witness'.

That's okay if the witness is hostile, as the people on the street would likely become if you stopped them to ask Star Trek questions.

Yeah, 90% of the answers would probably be a stare as the person slowly backed away.

The other 10% of answers involve a fist in the face. Which is why I never leave the basement without a football helmet superglued to my head.
 
UWC Defiance said:It'll be changed at least as much as the TMP ship.
So speaketh the All-Knowing Oracle...

(sheesh)...

Not "I think it will" or "I believe it will" but "It WILL, BECAUSE I COMMANDETH IT???"

Get real... you're saying what you WANT to happen. You have no "inside track" information whatsoever.
 
ancient said:


In court, that's called 'leading the witness'.

That's why I suggested it be done on the street and not in court.

I did purposefully phrase it to plant the suggestion in the subjects' minds that this is the Enterprise. I did that because the upcoming movie will be planting the suggestion that it's showing the Enterprise, no matter how much or little they change it.

My suggestion is that though the Enterprise is iconic world-wide, the vast majority of people will accept anything that's got a circular part and three tubular parts. If the new creative team tries a vast departure from what has been depicted before it will not be the cause of the movie's success or failure.

If the general public (sorry friends, they're the target audience, not us) reacted to major changes the way some of us are claiming they will, Transformers would have bombed instead of merely being ripped apart on blogs and message boards.
 
Hey guys me again, i kind knew my post would receive good replays and to add from my previous post let make it clear i don't hate or dislike original Enterprise nor am i in some-kind,, competing,, against it. Of course i don't want radical changes nor a ,,sport car,, ;) but Orci has stated, "We're not going to start totally from scratch... we want it to feel like it's updated and of the now... and an interview posted 8 March 2007, MTV stated that Kurtzman and Orci had confirmed that this Star Trek would be a "reimagining of the franchise". I happened ed to agree with this as right approach. I like point out changes doesn't have to mean negative or bad thing. If they are recasting entire cast(and Abrams is doing great job at it) why shouldn't they upgrade Enterprise too. Isn't Enterprise Refit changes consider a improvement from the original! Same thing with TNG ships, isn't Enterprise E consider (vast) improvement then bulky Enterprise D! I think it is on both on counts. Yes i know XI movie ,,timeline,, is prior to WNHGB but that doesn't mean that ship or customs is require to look like from 60s TOS.
 
Vektor said:
It’s true that the TOS Enterprise is about as iconic as it gets in terms of sci-fi spaceships, but as with so many other things, Trek fans tend to overestimate the importance of such things to the rest of the population at large. Show ten random people a picture of the Enterprise and probably nine of them will instantly recognize it. But try withholding the picture and asking the same ten people to describe the ship in detail and you will probably get ten wildly different answers. Sure, most of them will be able to tell you it had a big, round saucer in front, a cigar-shape below with a funky satellite dish mounted on it, and a couple of big, tubular engines on the back with spinning, glowy things on the front. Most of them could probably tell you approximately what color the hull and other major parts were and what the registry number was. Maybe half could tell you where the bridge was supposed to be. A few would probably know where the hangar deck was located. One or two might be able to tell you how many impulse engines it had or how many fins (intercoolers) there were on the backs of the engine nacelles. I’d be surprised if even one of them knew how many windows there were on the side of the secondary hull or what the angle of the leading edge of the neck was or how many grill panels there were on the insides of the engine struts.

The fact is, most people aren’t intimately familiar with every little detail of the ship’s design. They know the general configuration and certain distinctive elements like the nacelle caps and the copper colored deflector dish, but I don’t doubt for a minute that you could change almost everything else in various subtle ways and the vast majority of people out there would be none the wiser.

Personally, I don’t think there’s anything wrong or glaringly “out of date” about the original design and that it would look perfectly spectacular on the big screen using modern photography and special effects. On the other hand, I’ll be surprised if they don’t make at least a few changes, mostly to add visual detail. All in all, though, I’ll bet what we wind up with looks very much like the ship from TOS when viewed from typical distances and perspectives.

Far fewer people would be able to identify those particulars than you estimate, I think. I've been a Trekkie since 1979 and a lot of those details escape me--I could't tell you the number of windows, for example, and I'd have to think abot the intercoolers. Once you eliminate the true fans, I think less than 1 person in 50 could tell you her registry number. The only people who give a care over the old girl are us.

Still, I hope they stick as close to the original as they can, UWC Defiance's assertion up-thread that she'll be changed at least as much as the refit aside. (Considering the retro ad campaign Paramount's already launched, I doubt that is true.) I predict we will get a design which, on first, second and third glance, is our E (why alienate the remaining fans by making changes the GP won't care about?) but which differs in subtle ways and has more detail (aztec more than greeblies, I hope).
 
There's alot to be said for simplicity. If GR got it right, why mess with perfection ? and at the risk of pissing off the fans. Keeping the universe is part and parcel of canon which he said he'd respect. If there's a transclucent hull and no windows I will be happy.
 
Guartho said:
My suggestion is that though the Enterprise is iconic world-wide, the vast majority of people will accept anything that's got a circular part and three tubular parts. If the new creative team tries a vast departure from what has been depicted before it will not be the cause of the movie's success or failure.

If the general public (sorry friends, they're the target audience, not us) reacted to major changes the way some of us are claiming they will, Transformers would have bombed instead of merely being ripped apart on blogs and message boards.

I'm sure they could tell the difference between the 1701 and Cary's ship. Except maybe if it were shrunken down to the size of an avatar instead of appearing on a movie screen.

In any case, as far as the Transformers goes, the originals were poorly animated cartoons, not physical models such as the 1701, whose design has been clearly shown to hold up well in HD. Making a blocky cartoon character into an actual working machine is one thing. But a good ship design is a good ship design.

The original 1701 has never appeared on the big screen before, and I think it's time it did.
 
I say keep her the way she is. The Enterprise still looks as good now as she did when Matt Jefferies first created her.

The only thing I might change, however, would be to remove/rework the little boomerang graphics that are on the engineering hull and the nacelles. Pretty 60's.
 
Vejur said:
*snip*
Same thing with TNG ships, isn't Enterprise E consider (vast) improvement then bulky Enterprise D!
*snip*

Well that is certainly up for debate... :p
 
Blip said:
Vejur said:
*snip*
Same thing with TNG ships, isn't Enterprise E consider (vast) improvement then bulky Enterprise D!
*snip*

Well that is certainly up for debate... :p
:wtf: wait a minute i cant be reading this right :eek: OMG this cant be true. C´mon what is next Daedalus class is prettier then NX-01 :brickwall:
 
ancient said:

I'm sure they could tell the difference between the 1701 and Cary's ship. Except maybe if it were shrunken down to the size of an avatar instead of appearing on a movie screen.

Sure, if you presented both of them and asked them to "pick the Enterprise" But that's not the situation they'll be in in the theater seats.

However, our predictions for this hypothetical survey are probably all wrong. I have a feeling that the most frequent response would be more like "Go play with your light saber, Trekkie."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top