You mean Klingot?
But at least it'd be better to get a minor actor who looks somewhat like him rather than a star who doesn't in the least.
I have a feeling that Del Toro turned the role down because it was not a "starring" guest star role.
I imagine Spock Prime will be a bigger role than the one Del Toro turned down.
Yeah, Star Trek starring Eric Bana. "Hey, I know him". Not a big profile but bigger than the rest of the cast put together. They were looking for a well known actor for the role which is why Russel Crowe's name was mentioned at the time. The previous film also had Leonard Nimoy in it. I'm not saying the success of the movie hinged on those two actors but it's a publicity weight that the rest of the cast didn't have.I think having a higher profile actor as a villain would give the film wider appeal. The main cast don't yet have the pulling appeal a long term big name star would.
The first film did just fine at the box office, and the closest thing it had to a high profile actor was Eric Bana. I'd rather they pick someone audiences are less familiar with, who can be excellent (like Ramirez, who is supposed to be terrific in Carlos), than a name who might be less interesting.
If he's good enough to play the Commandante, he's good enough to play Kor (or whoever else the antagonist will be)!!^ He's a good actor but on the slight and small side, isn't he?
you're absolutely right, but skin colour aside, if we just talk about the body types...I doubt Cumberbatch is taking over a role that delToro was supposed to play.So now they went and hired some pasty Brit to play "a lead role" which can only be a villain role by process of deduction, so does that mean the villain is someone who could have been played just as easily by a Latino? That rules out Khan (pasty dude can't play him) and probably someone like Lord Garth (can't see him as Latino). The only role that covers both bases is...a KLINGON!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.