• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Eddington prooves or disproves that bald Captains are best?

Guy Gardener

Fleet Admiral
Admiral
He was certainly losing his top. Bald Captains are best. But, he out maneuvered Sisko at every turn who had less hair... So Eddington sits in both camps as a relative representative of each... but Eddingonton was naturally bald and the only thing stopping Sisko from having a Carwash sized afro was merely time.
 
We can't forget Picard or Kirk, either. Speaking as a fellow "Person of Scalp," I really appreciate this thread.
Remember, God made only a few perfect heads. He put hair on all the rest.
 
^^^Be proud of your smooth dome! Remember,

God is good,
God is fair,
To some he gave brains,
To others, hair.
 
Re: Eddington prooves or disproves that bald Captains are be

I have a hairy brain, so where does that leave me?
 
Re: Eddington prooves or disproves that bald Captains are be

^You can always shave and willingly become a member of the bald community. We rock. And we make great Captains.
 
Re: Eddington prooves or disproves that bald Captains are be

I don't know. I'd hate to get a nick in my pre frontal lobe.
 
Re: Eddington prooves or disproves that bald Captains are be

Upon further reflection... Eddington was a warlord, which made him the equivalent of an admiral or Fleet Captain in a military capacity, and the federation president in a diplomatic capicity... Until you factor in that Sisko was a Demigod, well the relative power issues between these two ain't exactly skim level.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top