Early Criticism: What’s Unfounded and What Isn’t

[Nerys Myk]

Could be done with other tasks.

It's relatable.

 

[fireproof78]

Could be done with other tasks.

Uniformity and responsibility train unit cohesion.

 

[Detached Nacelle]

And the bulk of this discussion is generated by the show's primary demographic, which - coincidentally - is the same demographic that dominates every single other Trek product: 40+ males.

As someone half a decade away from 40, I think it would be fair to say there's a sizable portion of the fanbase in the 30-40 range, those of us who had childhoods during the Berman era. Nepo fans mostly.

Teens and twenties in this day and age seem harder to court. Outside I guess children of Berman era babies who are now growing up with the Kurzman era.

 

[CT_Phipps]

That's not really true with what was shown on screen for that one though, because Ake could have said "take out their weapons and engines".

It's also killing the entire crew when I'm not sure if the other crew had killed anyone.

 

[Fateor]

It's also killing the entire crew when I'm not sure if the other crew had killed anyone.

They didn't, the Doctor very specifically reported no causalities.

 

[firehawk12]

They didn't, the Doctor very specifically reported no causalities.

Yeah they probably didn't want to start the pilot episode with some dead kids. lol

It reminds me a bit of this scene:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Here the writers need to make sure the "bad guys" execute one of their own -but not even an innocent guy-, just to make clear to the viewers they are actually bad guys.
Because up to this point, they are just the legitimate security force on this planet, and our "heroes" just kill them all next scene. Even though they actually didn't DO anything evil until this point - only having Booker at gunpoint, who, well, broke their laws in this moment.

Of course later we find out they were all part of the evil syndicate and thus deserves to die (??). But in this introductory moment? Quite dubious.
Which, your know, I'm even somewhat fine in dumb action schlock. Heroes kill tons of mooks. Whatever.
But then please don't have a speech afterwards about the sanctity of life and how morally upstanding we have to be.

If anything, if it was one of the War College ships that did that, at least it'd be understandable as a way to differentiate the new Starfleet philosophy to the current "kill first, ask questions" later philosophy that caused Ake to resign in the first place.

I mean in the grand scheme of things it really doesn't matter, but it's so easy to solve this problem so that some audience members don't feel tonal whiplash even if they can fill in the gaps themselves. I've watched Taken and John Wick and whatever and I have no problem with action heroes who murder dozens of guys without a second thought. But I don't think that's what the writers are going for with Ake.