World War III wasn't a 27-year war unless it was such a slow burn that it took ten or twenty years to really reach a massive scale.
The Korean War is still going, after over 70 years [https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladi...korea-agree-in-principle-to-formally-end-war/].World War III wasn't a 27-year war unless it was such a slow burn that it took ten or twenty years to really reach a massive scale.
It uh “didn’t start out” as WWIII…
It could. Smaller conflicts all grouped together due to the fragmentary nature of the records.World War III wasn't a 27-year war unless it was such a slow burn that it took ten or twenty years to really reach a massive scale.
That's silly. Why can't there be?- Any notion of a "second civil war" is total horseshit
He doesn't seem to be the kind of guy to do that, it would undermine his point.- Pike's speech before the leaders of Kiley 279 (in the pilot episode) was not meant to be taken literally; he was intentionally embellishing/bullshitting his tale, to make an added impact on them
I mean, in fairness there can be ambiguity over when a war starts. Some historians would say that World War II started when Nazi Germany invaded Poland in September 1939. Others might argue it started when Japan invaded Manchuria. So I think there is wiggle room over exactly when it started, and there's wiggle room to allow for the idea that earlier wars may have bled into World War III....
That's silly. Why can't there be?
He doesn't seem to be the kind of guy to do that, it would undermine his point.
He was presumably using historical footage in his presentional.Equally, he's not an historian, so perhps he's regurgitating his favourite holowriter's interpretation (how many people's understanding of the Napoleonics are based around Richard Sharpe, or of Pearl Harbour the Michael Bay film?), or what he learnt 30 years previously on his A-Level course?
Why? Would it not be logical for World War III to be the merged spiraling of several local conflicts?- Any notion of a "second civil war" is total horseshit
He was presumably using historical footage in his presentional.
So can everything we’ve ever seen or heard in Trek. Didn’t you know the entire thing was Federation propaganda and the Klingons are actually the good guys?Which can be edited however he chooses.
That's not in the Novelverse. The reference to Lee Kuan being the founder of ECON comes from David Goodman's Federation: The First 150 Years which is not considered part of the Novelverse, and indeed directly contradicts the Novelverse on many matters.That would also explain the identity of Lee Kuan (a fictional 21st-century dictator, mentioned but never seen in TOS). In the novelverse, Lee is indeed the founder of the ECON.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.