you mean phat?No. It's fat.
That's...reading an awful lot into a ship design of questionable aesthetic appeal.My main problem with the design is simply, that it is brutalistic. That is the design of sociopathic cultures like communistic/nationalistic dictatorships. This "Discovery" fits to cultures like the former Soviet Union, the Third Reich or North Korea.
My main problem with the design is simply, that it is brutalistic. That is the design of sociopathic cultures like communistic/nationalistic dictatorships. This "Discovery" fits to cultures like the former Soviet Union, the Third Reich or North Korea. But not to a humanistic Starfleet, which uses elegant ship designs to represent its culture.
That's...reading an awful lot into a ship design of questionable aesthetic appeal.
It's one thing to think that it doesn't convey the spirit of Trek to you...quite another to see Stalin and Hitler in it.Every little design element of a TV show and film is about telling the story and has the only purpose to support the story telling without using words but visual keys to the audience. What story does the Discovery design tell?
It's one thing to think that it doesn't convey the spirit of Trek to you...quite another to see Stalin and Hitler in it.
It's a mutt built from scrap, fitting my thoughts about its likely story as a character.It's hard to comment on the ships style when it is a mish-mash of others. A traditional round saucer mated via an exceptionally thin neck to an odd and painfully old fashioned hull all finished off with some almost modern style curvy nacelles but seemingly packaging old components... It's a mess.
That's an interesting thought that hadn't quite occurred to me...a rebuilt starship. Maybe NCC-1031 was just the registry of the saucer they happened to get ahold of. (Or does it appear somewhere on the seondary hull?)It's a mutt built from scrap
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.