• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Does Enterpise-A's short tenure make sense?

If we saw the Yorktown, and she was a Connie, I would be more inclined to consider it. As it is, we have no idea what class that ship was. How far from Earth was she, I wonder? I just always pictured that as one of the lesser vessels, for some reason.

Yorktown was a World War II aircraft carrier, and the original name for Trek’s starship. I can’t imagine the intention was for it to be a lesser ship.
 
As the article suggests, they used the model from Star Trek III
The saucer and engineering hull from the TSFS post-explosion model were used separately, so there could've been two Connies at Wolf 359. Or just one that had a really bad day.

The TSFS destroyed saucer was also used for the Olympia in "The Sound of Her Voice," so that's another possibility, though it could just as easily be any round-saucered ship since it's not seen very clearly.
 
Actually, I think we all just had a brain fart. The ship in Star Trek IV was the Saratoga. Have we ever seen the Yorktown referenced?
 
I guess I always missed the fact that it wasn't just a returning-shot check-in on the previously-established Saratoga.
 
Yorktown was a World War II aircraft carrier, and the original name for Trek’s starship. I can’t imagine the intention was for it to be a lesser ship.

Not realizing the Yorktown existed, it was the Saratoga I imagined as a lesser ship.

This is the first time I ever realized that IV checked in on multiple ships. lol.
 
I always felt that the Enterprise-A was decommissioned only because construction of the Enterprise-B had been finished, and they were ready to roll out the new ship. So it was just a matter of politics, not ship longevity times. I think the plan was always to make the next Excelsior class ship the Enterprise-A, but the Whale Probe incident changed those plans prematurely.
 
Well, it is. It's visibly Miranda-class, same as Reliant.
They actually use the model / do exterior shots??
We should regroup to make sure we're all on the same page. :)

The Saratoga is visibly a Miranda class, exteriors seen. Lights flicker, ship drifts as Probe passes by.
The Yorktown we only see from the bridge, with talk of a makeshift solar sail so that the crew might live.
 
I probably knew that when I was a kid, giving rise to my thought that it was a lesser ship. I truly don't remember seeing it though lol!! And I ABSOLUTELY thought that was the surviving crew of the Saratoga making the makeshift solar sail.
 
For me it makes sense that the A is an old ship that got renamed as a gift to Kirk while they waited for the proper sequel ship to be built and launched. Us Aussies have had a bunch of our naval ships as renames from other navies so it doesn't worry me renaming an old Starfleet ship, and I kinda liked the idea that the "The Ashes of Eden" had it get renamed once more. It's not what I originally imagined had happened before Generations had come out, where I would have 100% told you the A was a new ship. But I like imagining that all the different theories about the ship happened in different timelines/universes and maybe in one the A was a new ship and continued on past Khitomer without Kirk at the helm.
 
And I ABSOLUTELY thought that was the surviving crew of the Saratoga making the makeshift solar sail.
Even though the Saratoga had a black woman as their Captain, while it's an Indian male with Captain's insignia on his uniform making the report about the solar sail?
 
It's debatable as to whether the Federation is a true post-scarcity society. On an individual level perhaps, but starships still represent a mammoth investment of time and limited resources. We might refer to the Federation as proto-post-scarcity. Compare it to something like the Culture in the novels of Iain M Banks, for example, which is WAY further along to true post-scarcity than we see in Star Trek.

Wasn't the implied threat during the Dominion War that the Federation would eventually lose because they couldn't build ships as fast as the Dominion could? (And not replace their personnel as quickly, too.)
 
Wasn't the implied threat during the Dominion War that the Federation would eventually lose because they couldn't build ships as fast as the Dominion could? (And not replace their personnel as quickly, too.)

I don’t remember that ever being stated. I could be wrong, though. It has been over 30 years since DS9.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top