And that's cool,
Rahul. (Huh, that rhymes. I'm a poet and I didn't even know it.

) We all have our pet theories. But its the first part of your comment that I think really gets me too. I have my theories as to why its such a big deal but I'd prefer not to get into it. Opens a huge can of worms that isn't worth opening. Have a good day, friend.
I don't know. I've seen from the last few pages about "mansplaining" and white-dude stuff. But quite honestly - I think that's more a case of people trying to
hijack this topic politically, rather than the original reason this became a topic in the first place...
I thought his death wasn't really handled well, and I certainly don't have problems with Burnham or even sympathy for Conelly. I just like sometimes having an asshole on the cast as well, if it's handled right. And he certainly was that. Maybe I'm just hopelessly optimistic, in that I think a lot of the "Mary Sue"/"SJW"/"femnazi"-stuff is just a very, very tiny ̶m̶̶a̶̶j̶̶o̶̶r̶̶i̶̶t̶̶y̶
minority that is very, very loud, and tries to overtake
existing debates with their crude arguments, but should best be ignored.
For references - I'm a guy that didn't like "Last Jedi" either, but because I thought it was simply not a well-put together story. Rey, Fin and Poe OTOH are some of my absolute favourite SW characters. And that 'Solo' - the one movie where they backpedaled, had a generic straight white-guy lead, and a robot mocking "SJWs" - that
this was the movie that flopped - IMO strenghtens the theory that - while that reactonary political crap is simply the
loudest criticism on the Interwebs - the movies itself just weren't that good regardless of that.
Same for Connelly - he had an entire little sub-plot around him, that overall just wasn't really engaging, and felt a bit like a waste of time.