• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Do you want ongoing novels on the Kelvin Universe

Do you want ongoing novels on the Kelvin Universe

  • Yes

    Votes: 47 59.5%
  • No

    Votes: 32 40.5%

  • Total voters
    79
  • Poll closed .
Anyway, hopefully Discovery -- a new series set in the Prime Universe after 2233 -- will finally convince people that the Kelvinverse didn't "erase" the Primeverse but that they exist in parallel. (Although it'll take a bit longer than we thought, since DSC has just been delayed from January to May. Not really surprising, given that there isn't even any casting news yet.)
 
^ Until the very first continuity error crops up, and then those people will all be saying, "see, it wasn't in Prime after all!"

Yeah, just like they insisted that TMP and TWOK couldn't be in the same universe as TOS. Heck, Nicholas Meyer himself didn't consider TWOK to be in continuity with TMP.

Honestly, I wish Discovery weren't in Prime. It's bound to reinterpret and modernize a lot of elements, including alien designs. The producers have said as much. And I don't look forward to the online debates that's going to cause. I got sick enough of "The technology is too advanced!" posts while ENT was on the air.
 
Err, that's not at all what Desert Kris was talking about. First of all, he was making a "sewed" pun in response the puns in the previous posts. Second, he was talking about the idea that was established all the way back in 2009 -- that the Kelvin Timeline was a parallel history rather than a replacement for the Prime Timeline -- and that's completely distinct from the question of whether the Kelvin Timeline was different before 2233 as well as after it.

Oh, my bad.

Yeah, just like they insisted that TMP and TWOK couldn't be in the same universe as TOS. Heck, Nicholas Meyer himself didn't consider TWOK to be in continuity with TMP.

I really don't understand that position (esp. as TWOK builds on stuff, like the refitted Enterprise, Kirk's promotion to the brass). It always felt like a followup to me, IMHO.

Honestly, I wish Discovery weren't in Prime. It's bound to reinterpret and modernize a lot of elements, including alien designs. The producers have said as much. And I don't look forward to the online debates that's going to cause.

Well, the fact that it's in Prime is what's really making me interested in it, given that that's "my" Trek. (My only complaint is that CBS is not allowing it to be on Netflix here in the US and is making it an exclusive of their streaming service.)

I'm not exactly tickled to hear that they're planning to reimagine some things (tech makes perfect sense, aliens do not), although I suppose we'll have to wait and see what they have in mind, though, before making our judgements.

Some debate can be fine, but I don't blame you for not looking forward to them getting out of hand (esp. since you don't seem to abhor retcons and changes like some fans do). It does seem like the show is getting a lot of crap before its even been completed, though. Like the design of the ship. I don't know, I thought it looked cool and am sorry to hear that the producers are backing down and redesigning it just because a few people were complaining online. I mean, can't we let the show actually come out and judge it then, or is that just too much common sense?

I got sick enough of "The technology is too advanced!" posts while ENT was on the air.

ENT's tech was too advanced?! The show went out of its way to show just how primitive it was compared to TOS/TAS's, much less TNG/DS9/VOY's!
 
Last edited:
^ As far as I know, the ship we previewed had not been final. The redesign just finalises it, and has no relation to angry voices of the Internet.

You'll notice that the ship was lo-rez. And remember when we saw the first ever image of the NX-01? Different color scheme and the pontoons were not raised above the saucer.

I'm okay with whatever they come up with as long as I can get a model of it ASAP.

Original topic:
So, novels about the Kelvin, maybe straddling different timelines, would be cool.
 
ENT's tech was too advanced?! The show went out of its way to show just how primitive it was compared to TOS/TAS's, much less TNG/DS9/VOY's!

Ohhhh yeah, that was a huge thing when Enterprise was on the air. Not the technology exactly (though there were complaints about them having a transporter at all, I think, and people saying that "phase pistols" contradicted The Cage), but the UI was a big thing; they thought it was anachronistic (prochronistic?) against TOS and didn't make any sense as something between the 21st century and the 23rd, that it made TOS's UI design look too primitive in comparison.

And then there were all the comments about the "Akiraprise", people saying that the NX-01 was too reminiscent of the Akira-class from 24th century and didn't seem to fit into a design lineage that could lead to the Constitution-class, that the overall ship design was too advanced when compared to TOS.

It was a big annoying thing that still hangs around here and there in some of the still-anti-Enterprise fandom regions.
 
I really don't understand that position (esp. as TWOK builds on stuff, like the refitted Enterprise, Kirk's promotion to the brass). It always felt like a followup to me, IMHO.

Of course it used the same sets and miniatures, because it was a low-budget followup to a hugely expensive movie. They even considered doing it as a TV movie at first, which is why they gave it to the producer of The Six Million Dollar Man. They had to use the same sets and miniatures and the like, because they didn't have the budget to replace them. That's got nothing to do with story continuity, any more than "The City on the Edge of Forever" using the same backlot as The Andy Griffith Show means that Andy and Opie existed in the Trek universe. But they did change as much as they could. They replaced the uniforms, they rearranged several of the bridge stations, they redressed main engineering with a bunch of stock prop consoles from Modern Props (that also showed up in Airplane 2, The Incredible Hulk's "Prometheus," and a ton of other '80s productions), they constructed the radiation room for Spock's death scene out of leftover bits of the Klingon bridge set, they totally redecorated the crew quarters, they changed the lighting and the sound effects to give the ship a different ambience, etc.

And yes, it kept the whole "Admiral Kirk" thing, but ignored the fact that he'd gone back to starship command at the end of TMP. It cherrypicked what it could use and ignored the rest. It kept it ambiguous enough that the viewers could choose to believe they were consistent -- and maybe that was intentional -- but it basically told its own story that stood apart from any of TMP's events.


I'm not exactly tickled to hear that they're planning to reimagine some things (tech makes perfect sense, aliens do not), although I suppose we'll have to wait and see what they have in mind, though, before making our judgements.

Trek has been reimagining its aliens for decades. Every time a new makeup artist comes in, they put their own stamp on the alien designs, just like a new comic-book artist will bring their own style to how a superhero is drawn. Even aside from the sea change from TOS-style Klingons (which themselves had two different makeups) to the ridged version, we've seen several substantially different designs of ridged Klingon -- the Fred Phillips version from TMP with a single central spine and ridged nose, the Burman Studios version from TSFS with individualized head plates and smooth noses, the Michael Westmore TV version with head plates and ridged noses, the Richard Snell version from TVH onward with the smaller head plates and smooth noses, and the distinctive Neville Page version from STID with the bald heads, pointed ears, and bright eyes. We've also seen several radically different Andorian designs which I'm sure Therin can show you a collage of -- the TOS version with the thick rear-mounted antennae, the TMP redesign with thin, forehead-mounted antennae, the weird tall-headed design briefly glimpsed in TNG, and the Westmore version with forward-mounted animatronic antennae. Westmore himself completely redesigned the Trill from "The Host" to DS9 and the Ktarians from "The Game" to VGR.

Of course it doesn't make sense in-universe, but sometimes you just have to remember that this is fiction. It's an artistic creation approximating a conjectural reality. And that means there's a degree of artistic license involved, and that different creators will interpret the same thing in different ways according to their individual styles. Heck, you're the one who keeps arguing that we should accept the design inconsistencies in the Kelvin timeline as artistic license rather than timeline changes.


I don't know, I thought it looked cool and am sorry to hear that the producers are backing down and redesigning it just because a few people were complaining online.

Don't believe Internet rumors. That one's exceptionally ignorant, ludicrous, and easily disproven. We were told outright from the beginning that the video released a while back was just an FX test that did not represent the final design of the ship (which is no doubt why they were willing to release it at all). They were already modifying the design back then, long before the fans got a look at it. And the recent announcement of a production delay probably has more to do with the fact that Bryan Fuller is producing both this and American Gods at the same time and needs the extra time to do a good enough job with both. Or it's possible that there are delays in the writing process, casting, production development, or any number of other factors. Productions get delayed all the time for reasons that have nothing to do with uninformed fans' premature opinions.


ENT's tech was too advanced?! The show went out of its way to show just how primitive it was compared to TOS/TAS's, much less TNG/DS9/VOY's!

Yes, exactly. That's clear to a reasonable observer. But some fans mistook the fact that it looked more complex and detailed, that it was depicted using sophisticated 21st-century production techniques instead of cruder 1960s production techniques, for an actual greater advancement in-universe. Again, they mistook differences in artistic style for differences in the thing the different artists were depicting.
 
^ Until the very first continuity error crops up, and then those people will all be saying, "see, it wasn't in Prime after all!"

Unfortunately, you're right. Hell, some of them are already saying that. :(

I wonder what DSC could possibly do that would erase all doubt?
 
Of course it used the same sets and miniatures, because it was a low-budget followup to a hugely expensive movie. They even considered doing it as a TV movie at first, which is why they gave it to the producer of The Six Million Dollar Man. They had to use the same sets and miniatures and the like, because they didn't have the budget to replace them. That's got nothing to do with story continuity, any more than "The City on the Edge of Forever" using the same backlot as The Andy Griffith Show means that Andy and Opie existed in the Trek universe. But they did change as much as they could. They replaced the uniforms, they rearranged several of the bridge stations, they redressed main engineering with a bunch of stock prop consoles from Modern Props (that also showed up in Airplane 2, The Incredible Hulk's "Prometheus," and a ton of other '80s productions), they constructed the radiation room for Spock's death scene out of leftover bits of the Klingon bridge set, they totally redecorated the crew quarters, they changed the lighting and the sound effects to give the ship a different ambience, etc.

Wow, that's quite resourceful.

And yes, it kept the whole "Admiral Kirk" thing, but ignored the fact that he'd gone back to starship command at the end of TMP. It cherrypicked what it could use and ignored the rest. It kept it ambiguous enough that the viewers could choose to believe they were consistent -- and maybe that was intentional -- but it basically told its own story that stood apart from any of TMP's events.

Fair enough. However, I don't think anything in TWOK contradicted the first movie, so I guess I never saw the reason to assume that it they weren't in the same continuity. I mean there are dozens of episodes that aren't alluded to in later installments and that doesn't mean that they "never" happened within the show's fictional reality.


Trek has been reimagining its aliens for decades. Every time a new makeup artist comes in, they put their own stamp on the alien designs, just like a new comic-book artist will bring their own style to how a superhero is drawn.

True, however quite a few of them remain generally the same. I mean, Vulcan makeup is essentially the same.
Even aside from the sea change from TOS-style Klingons (which themselves had two different makeups) to the ridged version, we've seen several substantially different designs of ridged Klingon -- the Fred Phillips version from TMP with a single central spine and ridged nose, the Burman Studios version from TSFS with individualized head plates and smooth noses, the Michael Westmore TV version with head plates and ridged noses, the Richard Snell version from TVH onward with the smaller head plates and smooth noses, and the distinctive Neville Page version from STID with the bald heads, pointed ears, and bright eyes.

Full confession. I've always felt that the that the switch from the TOS-style to the movies was a bridge too far. If a redesign makes the alien in question look like a completely different species, then it really under-minds the suspension of disbelief (IMHO). However, ENT did paper that one over, so I don't have a problem with it (loved those episodes).

Also, I always thought that, excusing the awful STID redesign, that the various ridge designs looked enough alike to be natural variations in the gene pool. (I do kind of wish though that STID and other projects had had mixes of the different designs in the same scene.)

We've also seen several radically different Andorian designs which I'm sure Therin can show you a collage of -- the TOS version with the thick rear-mounted antennae, the TMP redesign with thin, forehead-mounted antennae, the weird tall-headed design briefly glimpsed in TNG, and the Westmore version with forward-mounted animatronic antennae.

Not sure I liked the TNG design (personally). The others I'm willing to concede as genetic variations.

Westmore himself completely redesigned the Trill from "The Host" to DS9 and the Ktarians from "The Game" to VGR.

I pull the "two kinds of Trill/Ktarian/whatever" for situations like this, but I like to keep this down to a minimum, since it strains my suspension of disbelief.

Of course it doesn't make sense in-universe, but sometimes you just have to remember that this is fiction. It's an artistic creation approximating a conjectural reality. And that means there's a degree of artistic license involved, and that different creators will interpret the same thing in different ways according to their individual styles.

Yeah, that's fair enough. One advantage of redesigns is that it gives the idea of the aliens having racial variations (like of in real like we all don't look exactly alike). I guess that, IMHO, if they still look like they belong to the same species, I don't mind. If they look radically different, I find it harder to rationalize, and so dislike it more. Since we don't know what's going to happen, I'm voting giving the show the chance to come on and present its new ideas first. For all we know the new stuff might be great riffs on the oldies.

Heck, you're the one who keeps arguing that we should accept the design inconsistencies in the Kelvin timeline as artistic license rather than timeline changes.

In all honesty, I take it on a case-by-case basis. The different actors I think falls under artistic license. New designs of tech and starships I think is timeline change, as is any post-2233 events that are different than the prime universe (obviously). Stuff like the Kelvin and the Franklin (and their crews) that existed before timeline change or were around before any major changes could snowball, I think exist in both universes. Some of the cityscapes I'm inclined to accept as existing in both timelines, esp. if we could view it as something that was just off-camera before. (Since sets and planets have always been designed with variations and don't always look exactly the same in the different prime universe stories, even if there's no logic to it, I think, in this case, it's fair to extend the Kelvin timeline the same courtesy in regard to Vulcan not looking quite the same shade of red, or whatever).

Funny, I though you preferred to view some of the changes as purely artistic license. Did I misunderstand you?

Don't believe Internet rumors. That one's exceptionally ignorant, ludicrous, and easily disproven. We were told outright from the beginning that the video released a while back was just an FX test that did not represent the final design of the ship (which is no doubt why they were willing to release it at all). They were already modifying the design back then, long before the fans got a look at it. And the recent announcement of a production delay probably has more to do with the fact that Bryan Fuller is producing both this and American Gods at the same time and needs the extra time to do a good enough job with both. Or it's possible that there are delays in the writing process, casting, production development, or any number of other factors. Productions get delayed all the time for reasons that have nothing to do with uninformed fans' premature opinions.

Okay. Goes to show how little I know.


Yes, exactly. That's clear to a reasonable observer. But some fans mistook the fact that it looked more complex and detailed, that it was depicted using sophisticated 21st-century production techniques instead of cruder 1960s production techniques, for an actual greater advancement in-universe. Again, they mistook differences in artistic style for differences in the thing the different artists were depicting.

What I think is really interesting is that "In a Mirror, Darkly" had both the ENT and TOS ships in the same episode, and, although the TOS ship looked exactly like it came from the '60s show, it still seemed more advanced than the more modern ENT one.

(As an aside, it's shows like that make me pause about the redesigns that we were talking about earlier. The show could've re-designed the Defiant to look more modern, but the joy of seeing the TOS era come to life again would've been lost. Updates do have their place, but I think that, in some cases, the original iterations hold more meaning.)
 
Funny, I though you preferred to view some of the changes as purely artistic license. Did I misunderstand you?

Of course we can and do rationalize the changes as something that exists in-universe, but in their original conception, they're all artistic license. Different creators bring different ideas and sensibilities to the table, and so they make changes. Whether those changes can be reconciled is often left as an exercise for the viewer, or for later creators who feel motivated to explain them. And as I've said before, what the creators were thinking when they came up with these ideas is a distinct topic from whether we can invent in-universe rationalizations for them after the fact.
 
Solution: the Federation was suffering a recession at the time the U.S.S. Enterprise was built, so Starfleet could only afford low-grade aesthetics for the ship.
 
^ It could simply be the fashion aesthetics of the 23rd century, or its dictated by a member species other than Humans.

If DSC comes up with new designs for existing aliens, I wonder if they'd also conceive of a new makeup for Humans?
 
Or a distant relative of Tom Paris who also loved the 20th century won a bet with Starfleet's CiC
 
If DSC comes up with new designs for existing aliens, I wonder if they'd also conceive of a new makeup for Humans?

In a way. I mean, I doubt men's eyeshadow is going to be appearing to the same extent as it did in TOS, which could be regarded as tweaking the appearance of the species. ;)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top