Oh my, an inconsistency in Star Trek. What ever shall I do?
Inconsistancy only matters if DSC does it.
Oh my, an inconsistency in Star Trek. What ever shall I do?
This year at leastInconsistancy only matters if DSC does it.
Everything but TOS is out of sync with TOS when it comes to Klingons.Surely at this point- it is the overal visuals, and nearly everything to do with Klingons in TOS that is now out of sync?
Not really. Everyone considers holodecks new in TNG, but Disco has them. Okay, the Voyager characters grew up with holodecks, so TNG is the outlier there, I guess. On DS9 everyone treated holographic communication as an amazing new achievement, but in Disco it's SOP. Context is for Kings shows Andoria looking very different than it did on Enterprise, and that's just off the top of my head.Discovery fits in ok-ish with ENT and TNG-era does it not?
Which it is.Inconsistancy only matters if DSC does it.
So minor niggles which by your own admission aren't consistent within the existing shows either. There must be a boatload of timelines out there if we're going to this level of detail.Not really. Everyone considers holodecks new in TNG, but Disco has them. Okay, the Voyager characters grew up with holodecks, so TNG is the outlier there, I guess. On DS9 everyone treated holographic communication as an amazing new achievement, but in Disco it's SOP. Context is for Kings shows Andoria looking very different than it did on Enterprise, and that's just off the top of my head.
I think the writers have brought it on themselves. They drew the line in the sand and made references to the origin show in the franchise. It's up to them to follow through.DSC is at odds with TNG as much as it is with TOS.
Nah, its the level of realism that's new.Not really. Everyone considers holodecks new in TNG, but Disco has them. Okay, the Voyager characters grew up with holodecks, so TNG is the outlier there, I guess. On DS9 everyone treated holographic communication as an amazing new achievement, but in Disco it's SOP. Context is for Kings shows Andoria looking very different than it did on Enterprise, and that's just off the top of my head.
Not really. Everyone considers holodecks new in TNG, but Disco has them. Okay, the Voyager characters grew up with holodecks, so TNG is the outlier there, I guess. On DS9 everyone treated holographic communication as an amazing new achievement, but in Disco it's SOP. Context is for Kings shows Andoria looking very different than it did on Enterprise, and that's just off the top of my head.
Well, when Lorca is showing Michael the spore drive demonstration at the end of Context is for Kings, he mentions Andoria when we see the planet with the Preserver obelisk on it. Which seems a good indication that planet is meant to be Andoria. But of course, on this forum Occam's Razor means squat.Was Andoria seen or just named dropped?
Do the other locations match up with dialog?Well, when Lorca is showing Michael the spore drive demonstration at the end of Context is for Kings, he mentions Andoria when we see the planet with the Preserver obelisk on it. Which seems a good indication that planet is meant to be Andoria. But of course, on this forum Occam's Razor means squat.
As they're all planets we'd never seen before, I guess it's anyone's guess. Still, one would think that mentioning a planet's name each time we see a new setting would indicated those settings are the planets being named, no?Do the other locations match up with dialog?
No.As they're all planets we'd never seen before, I guess it's anyone's guess. Still, one would think that mentioning a planet's name each time we see a new setting would indicated those settings are the planets being named, no?
How many images to we see? How many locations does Lorca mention?Fuck me up the goat ass, please tell me you're joking.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.