No, no - not that "mystery" (although I guessed that, too, even though I am not particularly familiar with feminine spirituality circles - I more or less know what the term "feminine spirituality circles" refers to, but I don't read their literature or anything). The mystery I was referring to was whodunit.
Sorry if this is considered thread-jacking but just guessing the whodunit in a whodunit doesn't mean that the book is no good. eg. I have guessed the whodunit in a few books (some Agatha Christie too - but never guessed in The Murder of Roger Ackroyd! I wonder whether anybody has?) including Dan Brown's latest - both questions - who is the bad guy and also the location of the mystery. But that isn't really the point of the book - the point of the book is to make high-grade addictive page-turning "pulp".
No, I agree that guessing whodunit doesn't automatically spoil a mystery book. However, for me, Brown's book (I've only read one) didn't work as an addictive page-turner either. I found it booooooOOOoooOOrrrrring. The only reasons I finished it were because I'm a bit anal that way, plus the fact that I wanted find out if I'd guessed right. That's why I haven't tried another. Life's too short, you know?
The fact that I guessed whodunit so quickly was just one disappointment in the long series of disappointments that was that silly book.
I agree with you on Roger Ackroyd - what a stunner!
To drag myself back OT, I think the Harry Potter books, while not great literature, are far better written than Twilight, but I admit that I am judging the latter only from the couple of chapters that I forced myself to read. Maybe that's not a fair sample plot-wise, but it is as far as writing quality. Aside from that, I just think the world they create is...kinda boring. But then, I'm not in the target audience.
Last edited: