• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Do all Federation member have same access?

Nathan

Commander
Red Shirt
Yes, Yes, I know its a show.

I was just thinking to my Army days that when I worked in a joint environment in Iraq with the coalition the forces (i.e. the British, French, Aussies, etc) that some intel/briefings was release-able to coalition countries, while some info was only certain country specific...meaning, we could have the Aussies and the Brits in the room, but if you were from Poland or another country you had to step out....and of course some was just USA only....where all our coalition partners had to leave the room.

I wonder how the Crew of the E-E handles it with the Cardy now part of the crew....does he have to step out of some briefings? Is there parts of the computer database he doesn't have access to?

Even with the Aventine Crew....do all members have unfettered access to the entire ship database?
 
This is a really interesting thread, Nathan. With your example of Dygan though, it wouldn't be about Federation members having the same access; what you're referring to, I believe, is the fact that Dygan isn't a Federation officer or indeed a citizen, he's there on an exchange program between allied nations. I do wonder how they handle the operational ins-and-outs of that. The Federation tends toward a policy of openness and easy access, of course, but naturally there must be other concerns taken into account, procedures that have to be followed to mollify everyone involved.

I must admit I hadn't thought about this until now. I'll be interested to see what others - those with more experience of this kind of logistical/political/military tomfoolery - have to say on the subject. It's a really interesting topic to consider.

PS: The army briefing shuffle sounds pretty funny. Her apple corps is strong!
 
Last edited:
Yes, Yes, I know its a show.

I don't think you need to worry about that disclaimer here; I think we're most all more Watsonian than Doylist here. :p

I was just thinking to my Army days that when I worked in a joint environment in Iraq with the coalition the forces (i.e. the British, French, Aussies, etc) that some intel/briefings was release-able to coalition countries, while some info was only certain country specific...meaning, we could have the Aussies and the Brits in the room, but if you were from Poland or another country you had to step out....and of course some was just USA only....where all our coalition partners had to leave the room.

I wonder how the Crew of the E-E handles it with the Cardy now part of the crew....does he have to step out of some briefings? Is there parts of the computer database he doesn't have access to?

Even with the Aventine Crew....do all members have unfettered access to the entire ship database?
Dygan's a special case in that he's not actually a Starfleet member or Federation citizen; I'm sure that his security access is lower than the others. But I don't believe we've ever seen limited access based on nation within the Federation. There are definitely things that only people of sufficient rank or access level are able to see, we've seen plenty of stuff like that, but I don't think we've ever seen any evidence in either the shows or the books that there'd be, say, an "Earth/Vulcan/Tellar/Andor/Alpha Centauri-eyes-only" level or something. The organization of the Federation is literally a federation; a federated government consisting of numerous nations on equal footing. It's more akin to the US (if individual states were separate countries) than to something like NATO or the like.

But if you mean something more like Federation/Klingon joint operations or something, then I'm sure that's the case, yeah. There's definitely been examples of the Federation keeping information wrapped up even from its closest allies.
 
But I don't believe we've ever seen limited access based on nation. There are definitely things that only people of sufficient rank or access level are able to see, we've seen plenty of stuff like that, but I don't think we've ever seen any evidence in either the shows or the books that there'd be, say, an "Earth/Vulcan/Tellar/Andor/Alpha Centauri-eyes-only" level or something..

True, of course, but I guess it's worth noting that the Federation does have its moments regarding subtle distinctions in status. The five founding worlds had permanent seats on the security council until at least 2380 (I wonder what happened following Andor's secession). This despite the fact that by the late 24th Century, Bolarus, say, was undoubtedly contributing more to the Federation's overall security than Andor.
 
Last edited:
Ah, that is true. But I don't think we've ever seen anything like that explicitly in Starfleet.

Implicitly, though, I suppose there's an argument to be made for that being one of the reasons for the heavy bias towards Human and Vulcan crew? Though that's more likely institutional bias than policy if anything.
 
Ah, that is true. But I don't think we've ever seen anything like that explicitly in Starfleet.

True, and I wouldn't think we would. As you say, the Federation doesn't work like that; if anything I'd say it goes to the other extreme and shares access a bit too freely, given that member worlds and member peoples can quite evidently get more out of the Federation than they contribute (easier to work with in a replicator-based economy, of course). I've never seen anything (and couldn't see the likelihood of anything) that, for example, restricted knowledge of intelligence or mission objectives to officers from certain member states and excluded others. The Federation is quite committed to the idea that all players are on equal footing within the family, no matter the political and economic realities - which we saw some of the secessionists complain about in the late 2370s (not entirely legitimately in my opinion, but then the Dominion War brought a lot of things into sharper relief and shook things up quite a bit).

As regards the security council business, and the secessionists' complaints, we also have things like Uhura in Catalyst of Sorrows being warned away by the Council when she tried to dig deeper into the First Families of Rigel, being told that they were embedded too deep into the Rigel System's institutions and that Rigel was too valuable to the Federation to risk offending. So it's definitely the case that there exists some...flexibility...as regards the member states being on equal footing. Legally and in the general spirit of things they are, but other matters will muddy the waters and give some more weight than others. But, yes, in terms of the letter of proceedings I can't see a Federation institution ever declaring something for the eyes or access of some members only.
 
I think there has to some info that Dygen can't (or shouldn't have access). Even tho' the Federation is on peaceful terms with Cardassia, I'm sure there is a Federation think-tank working the plans for an Invasion of Cardassia or to "Fend off an Invasiion"...you always gotta have plan. Even new weapon ideas or weapon characteristics (i.e. Does Dygen know the pros/cons of a Photon Torpedo, range, amt of damage, weaknesses?

Even with member worlds, probably the newer ones, I wonder if they would have access to all the Plans/Doctrine that the Federation has to offer. Even today, the US has the plans for an Invasion of North Korea (not that we are invading tomorrow!!), but if push comes to shove we have the invasion plan (i.e. number of ships; troops; logisitical support etc.

In fact, I think we almost have an invasion plan for almost every nation -- I remember watching the TV show The West Wing and there was an issue with some Canadian Separatists, and the one character said, "Yeah, I had to dig out the plan of the US to invade in Canada from the 1800s...I must say the calligraphy is beautiful!"

I wonder if the Titan crew...yeah the crew that jams IDIC down your throat <now dodging tomatoes> do some members have limited access to ship systems, research etc.

If you recall in Wrath of Khan when Spock/Kirk/McCoy got the video briefing about the Genesis project, would all members have access to the video?

Does all members of the Titan crew have info on the type of shields used when Voyager returned to the Earth (I mean the shields that looked like Batmobile shields)
 
^ Gotta watch out for those Canadian separatists. But then such an unholy fusion of English and French couldn't possibly lead to anything good. :p

In terms of member access, one does wonder how much intelligence Selelvia was able to share with the Tholians when it went, er, rogue-er. Although that's the risk one takes, I assume. Risk is their business, after all. If the Federation were interested only in its safety it would stay in its original core systems and hide behind defences, harvest the asteroids for resources and habitat space, etc. (T'Lara makes such arguments in The Buried Age). You don't get anywhere without taking risks and accepting a few bruises.

The Federation, certain realities of the wider galaxy notwithstanding, is extremely upfront and honest in its actions and policies; as Enabran Tain notes in The Art of the Impossible, this is their greatest strength/asset and greatest vulnerability as a power and as a civilization. There's also the fact that any informed and halfway intelligent member of a "lesser" or rival power, be they Romulan, Cardassian, Tzenkethi, etc., knows that Federation expansion is ideological, political or even accidental rather than military. Federation "invasion" is often simply unintended consequence of exposure. The Tzenkethi are a prime example; their functional order couldn't survive long-term immersion in the chaotic waves of a galaxy dancing to the Federation's tune, so they resist being drawn into it... even if their membership in the Typhon Pact, which they insist on seeing as strengthening themselves against that threat, actually involves them starting to paddle....

Basically, I imagine that the Federation is almost painfully open to new and potential members. I'm sure there are political and military assets that provide a necessary counter to this, keeping it from heading too far into the dysfunctional, though I imagine their role is as a cautionary counter-current tweaking the policies rather than anything setting policy as such. The Federation generally prefers the risks and evils of an open and (within reason) trusting policy to the risks and evils of a paranoid or overly defensive one.

We've actually seen groups like the Anti-Federation League in the novels, who basically take the Federation's ideals to the extreme and resent the UFP for supposedly not living up to them, by doing such things as arming its ships with powerful weapons and engaging in uneasy tactical dances with other major powers. That is, blaming the fact that realities in the wider galaxy force adjustment and compromise on the UFP supposedly not trying hard enough.
 
Last edited:
I was always confused with how in TOS Dr. McCoy seems to know nothing about Pon Farr. I don't know it that counts as something the would be considered a "Vulcan only" issue, maybe even a state secret. Or perhaps they're just too embarrassed to mention it. Of course, by the time Voyager rolls around the Doctor seems to know all about Pon Farr.
 
I'm afraid that Mccoy just wasn't a very good doctor - at least when it came to non-humans.

As for compartmentalising inside the federation, that really sounds ridiculous. It would be like having a briefing in the U.S. military, but only for those from California, Texas, Idaho and Alaska. Sure, information (like Genesis) is on a need-to-know basis, and limited by rank, security clearance, etc, but by species, or planet of origin? (How would you deal with an Andorian from Mumbai? Or a Human from Coridian? Or a Human from a non-federation world?)

However Dygan is an interesting case as a long term exchange officer, there will be information that's kept from him, presumably not enough to prevent him from doing his job, but ultimately he isn't a member of starfleet. More interesting to my mind is what about Nog? Worf is an Federation citizen (note, not an Earth citizen, a Federation citizen), but Nog isn't.
 
I would assume that access to information would be based off of rank and position rather than where a person is from.
 
Trill used to keep information about the symbionts out of the general Federation database so non-Trill wouldn't know anything about them, so I'd guess yes.

This assumes Trill was a member when Odan died I guess, but the sticky thread says that it's likely Trill joined in the early 23rd century, so I'm assuming that's accurate.
 
^ It seems from The Cloud-Minders that Ardana kinda kept that whole "we're oppressing a large segment of our population" thing hush-hush, too.
 
Count me in as one of those folks who thinks it's quite likely that Dygan, as an officer in the Cardassian Guard who is serving aboard the Enterprise, likely is not authorized to receive all classified information that Starfleet officers may receive. After all, while he may have been seconded to Starfleet, he ultimately (at the top of his chain of command) works for the Castellan of the Cardassian Union, not the President of the United Federation of Planets.

I agree with the others here that Federation, as a sovereign union of worlds, would not restrict access to classified information on the basis of one's Federation Member State of citizenship, anymore than the Royal Canadian Air Force would on the basis of one's province or the German Bundeswehr would on the basis of one's Land.

I was just thinking to my Army days that when I worked in a joint environment in Iraq with the coalition the forces (i.e. the British, French, Aussies, etc) that some intel/briefings was release-able to coalition countries, while some info was only certain country specific...meaning, we could have the Aussies and the Brits in the room, but if you were from Poland or another country you had to step out....and of course some was just USA only....where all our coalition partners had to leave the room.

Fascinating! If I may ask -- did that sort of thing ever cause tension?

This is a really interesting thread, Nathan. With your example of Dygan though, it wouldn't be about Federation members having the same access; what you're referring to, I believe, is the fact that Dygan isn't a Federation officer or indeed a citizen, he's there on an exchange program between allied nations. I do wonder how they handle the operational ins-and-outs of that.

In some ways, I imagine that the pervasive computerized surveillance that seems to accompany life aboard a Starfleet starship for everybody -- seriously, the damn ship keeps track of what room you're in at all times? -- would in some ways make it easier to restrict access to classified data. Likely there are files on the Enterprise computer that simply will not open if Dygan is in the room (presumably unless Picard or someone with sufficient security clearance countermands the automatic security lock).

But I don't believe we've ever seen limited access based on nation. There are definitely things that only people of sufficient rank or access level are able to see, we've seen plenty of stuff like that, but I don't think we've ever seen any evidence in either the shows or the books that there'd be, say, an "Earth/Vulcan/Tellar/Andor/Alpha Centauri-eyes-only" level or something..

True, of course, but I guess it's worth noting that the Federation does have its moments regarding subtle distinctions in status. The five founding worlds had permanent seats on the security council until at least 2380 (I wonder what happened following Andor's secession). This despite the fact that by the late 24th Century, Bolarus, say, was undoubtedly contributing more to the Federation's overall security than Andor.

I always wonder how that came about. Obviously, out-universe, it's a reference to the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, but the parallels are very rough. The U.N. Security Council, of course, is one of the principal organs of the U.N. organization in general; the Federation Security Council, on the other hand, is just the committee of the Federation Council charged with overseeing security issues -- the Federation's equivalent of the U.S. Senate Committees on Armed Services and Homeland Security and Government Affairs, or of the U.K. House of Commons Defence Select Committee.

I wonder if perhaps the founding Members get permanent representation in the Security Council as the unintended result of some arcane manner in which the Articles of the Federation were worded? I imagine that in the early years of the Federation, the Council wasn't even large enough to require dedicated sub-councils for different issues -- with Arken as the Federation's ninth member as of June 2165, it's likely that the Federation Council essentially conducted all business as a committee of the whole. Maybe by the time there were enough Federation Councillors to warrant creating dedicated sub-councils whose members could specialize, someone read the Articles, said, "Hey, they forgot to word this section so that other worlds' Councillors could get in," and then just never got around to passing a constitutional amendment to change it?

As regards the security council business, and the secessionists' complaints, we also have things like Uhura in Catalyst of Sorrows being warned away by the Council when she tried to dig deeper into the First Families of Rigel, being told that they were embedded too deep into the Rigel System's institutions and that Rigel was too valuable to the Federation to risk offending. So it's definitely the case that there exists some...flexibility...as regards the member states being on equal footing. Legally and in the general spirit of things they are, but other matters will muddy the waters and give some more weight than others.

Interesting! I have to admit that I never got around to reading those last couple of Lost Era novels. I should read Catalyst of Sorrows in light of what Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel has established about Rigel. I wonder -- has Rigel IV joined the United Rigel Worlds and Colonies by this point? Tower had them as a separate polity from the URWC.

^ Gotta watch out for those Canadian separatists. But then such an unholy fusion of English and French couldn't possibly lead to anything good. :p

Hey, now! My grandfather, a Canadian citizen, is from Ontario, and my step-cousins from his first marriage are proud citizens of Quebec! I'll not have you speaking ill of the great nation of Canada, eh? ;)

In terms of member access, one does wonder how much intelligence Selelvia was able to share with the Tholians when it went, er, rogue-er.

Ultimately, this would be a matter of what kinds of classified materials the Federation Councillor for Selelvia, and/or any other Selelvians in Starfleet or the Federation government who might have sided with their homeworld, would have had access to.

Basically, I imagine that the Federation is almost painfully open to new and potential members. I'm sure there are political and military assets that provide a necessary counter to this, keeping it from heading too far into the dysfunctional, though I imagine their role is as a cautionary counter-current tweaking the policies rather than anything setting policy as such. The Federation generally prefers the risks and evils of an open and (within reason) trusting policy to the risks and evils of a paranoid or overly defensive one.

Interestingly, The Fall seems to imply that even the citizens of polities that have only just become Federation Member States can qualify to run for Federation President, given the example of zh'Tarash. Unless they were fulfilled by zh'Tarash back when the Andorian Empire was still a UFP Member State, there doesn't seem to be any requirement that one have been a Federation citizen or resident in the Federation for x number of years: The instant your homeworld is in, you're a Federate and you can run for President.

We've actually seen groups like the Anti-Federation League in the novels, who basically take the Federation's ideals to the extreme and resent the UFP for supposedly not living up to them, by doing such things as arming its ships with powerful weapons and engaging in uneasy tactical dances with other major powers. That is, blaming the fact that realities in the wider galaxy force adjustment and compromise on the UFP supposedly not trying hard enough.

The Federation's equivalent of the radical left? I suppose it makes sense that in a pseudo-socialist utopia, the radical left would end up focusing more on foreign policy than on domestic.

The Federation also has its own equivalent of the reactionary right, as evidenced by the New Essentialist Movement and its attacks on the Risian Hedony in DSN's "Let He Who Is Without Sin...."

However Dygan is an interesting case as a long term exchange officer, there will be information that's kept from him, presumably not enough to prevent him from doing his job, but ultimately he isn't a member of starfleet. More interesting to my mind is what about Nog? Worf is an Federation citizen (note, not an Earth citizen, a Federation citizen), but Nog isn't.

1) Worf and the Rozhenkos first settled on Gault, but ended up living on Earth in Minsk. So Worf is probably a United Earth citizen in addition to being a Federation citizen -- when he votes, he's voting on Federation Councillor for United Earth. (I wonder if this means Worf is Belarusian?)

2) Side-note: Since Omicron Theta was described as an "Earth colony" (and thus presumably was part of the United Earth polity), I wonder if this means that Data is considered a United Earth citizen and therefore also receives his representation on the Federation Council through the Federation Councillor for United Earth?

3) Cases like Nog's are interesting. Nog is not (presumably) a Federation citizen -- but he is a Starfleet officer, and thus holds a commission from (presumably) the Federation President and has sworn an oath to serve the Federation and obey the lawful orders of Starfleet. Given this, I would say that Nog and other such foreign citizens serving in Starfleet are afforded the same trust that a Federate officer of comparable rank and experience would have.

Trill used to keep information about the symbionts out of the general Federation database so non-Trill wouldn't know anything about them, so I'd guess yes.

This assumes Trill was a member when Odan died I guess, but the sticky thread says that it's likely Trill joined in the early 23rd century, so I'm assuming that's accurate.

I really never know how to justify the idea that the Trill could keep what is, in essence, the foundation of their social structure and the most important aspect in the lives of their elites, secret from the Federation once they've joined. I just squint and try to ignore it.

^ It seems from The Cloud-Minders that Ardana kinda kept that whole "we're oppressing a large segment of our population" thing hush-hush, too.

I can justify that with the assumption that the Federation was still relatively new, was still in the process of federalizing power, and was probably rushing some planets into Membership status that really should have been vetted more if they were, for instance, located near the Klingon border.
 
Sci, it never really caused any tension....half the time my pals sorta knew the subject matter anyway, and the other half, they were RELIEVED they didn't have sit through yet ANOTHER meeting.

I still wonder are Federation members similar to the 50 US States....if so then just whoever has the rank and/or clearance is allowed to "unfettered" access to the info.

If the Federation more like the United Nations, then I say the info is and NEEDS to be more compartmentalized. When Andor left the Federation, all the Andorian bubbas in Starfleet could leave and use the info for the Typhon Pact, or whatever truce they wanted to be in.

And yep, even tho' Nog is a part of Starfleet, I still think the final boss is the Ferengi chain of command.

While I am typing here....I wonder on DS9 (during the TV Show era), did Kira have limited access to the Federation database....I assume so.....and I think she SHOULD have only LIMITED access....she's not a Federation member and her ultimate boss is the Kai (or whoever the Head of State is for Bajor) -- may not be the Kai -- but I'm too lazy to Wiki the Chain of Command for Bajor, but I digress.
 
Sci, it never really caused any tension....half the time my pals sorta knew the subject matter anyway, and the other half, they were RELIEVED they didn't have sit through yet ANOTHER meeting.

I still wonder are Federation members similar to the 50 US States....if so then just whoever has the rank and/or clearance is allowed to "unfettered" access to the info.

If the Federation more like the United Nations, then I say the info is and NEEDS to be more compartmentalized. When Andor left the Federation, all the Andorian bubbas in Starfleet could leave and use the info for the Typhon Pact, or whatever truce they wanted to be in.

I think every impression the franchise has ever given is that the Federation is more akin to a single nation that happens to be composed of other nations than a collection of nations working in unison, yeah; more UK and less EU. And I mean, the same could've been said for the South during the Civil War, but I don't imagine that there was more compartmentalization instituted according to state after that. Any body has the potential for secession, whether legal or extralegal.

And yep, even tho' Nog is a part of Starfleet, I still think the final boss is the Ferengi chain of command.

Oh, I don't see why that'd be the case at all; Nog was never even a member of the Ferengi military, he was a Ferengi civilian and so he had no place in any Ferengi chain of command any more than I would legally have to listen to anyone in the US military chain of command. Are foreign citizens that are members of the US military compartmentalized in that way? Would a British ex-pat with no history of British military service that's an actual officer in the US military (perhaps pursuing US citizenship through a military route or something like that) with the full clearance associated to their rank be compartmentalized to the degree that a British officer in a joint operation would be?
 
Idran, good point about Nog.....I a little foggy about non-US citizens in the US Military...I think eventually you have to become a citizen. I guess in Nog's case he would have the Dual-Citizenship. I still think his info would be compartmentalized until he had full Federation citizenship.

And just FYI, most of the stuff I worked with was released to NATO forces, but there is also a lot of stuff that is just for US personel only.

I think stuff that is US Forces only would be like the "Invasion Plan to North Korea" and lot when it comes to weapon system characteristics.
 
Idran, good point about Nog.....I a little foggy about non-US citizens in the US Military...I think eventually you have to become a citizen.

While military service does accelerate the citizenship process, it isn't actually required; the only requirement associated with a non-citizen joining the US military is that they're a legal immigrant, and while they can apply for expedited citizenship after even a single day of active service, it's not required.

Though I was slightly mistaken, in that non-citizens cannot hold actually commissions or become warrant officers, which probably makes the question of access to information moot anyway, since I imagine such people wouldn't have access to much even were they full citizens. And they can't apply for security clearances anyway. So there's implicit compartmentalization in that respect, I'd guess. But that already shows a distinction between Starfleet and the US Military as it stands, I'd guess, as Nog would almost have to have some sort of security clearance to become a commissioned officer.

Edit: Oh, Air Force non-citzen members aren't allowed to re-enlist, so technically they are forced to eventually become a citizen. Non-citizen enlisted soldiers in the Army were limited to 8 years, but that restriction was lifted in 2007.
 
Last edited:
Idran, good point about Nog.....I a little foggy about non-US citizens in the US Military...I think eventually you have to become a citizen. I guess in Nog's case he would have the Dual-Citizenship. I still think his info would be compartmentalized until he had full Federation citizenship.

Nog is an Academy-trained Starfleet officer, therefore he has the same rights and privileges as anyone else of his rank. The fact that he is a Ferengi is irrelevant. He's a "born and bred" part of Starfleet - that's all that matters.

(It was only relevant when Nog was applying for the Academy. At that time he needed a sponsor, because the Ferengi are not Federation members. But once Nog DID get in, and graduated, he automatically received all of the rights and access that anyone of his rank gets.)

Dygan is different, because he didn't attend the Academy. He was already an officer in another race's military (the Cardassians) who transferred over to Starfleet via an officer exchange program. Nog didn't do that - he had the same training and upbringing that any other Starfleet officer has.
 
Last edited:
Idran, good point about Nog.....I a little foggy about non-US citizens in the US Military...I think eventually you have to become a citizen. I guess in Nog's case he would have the Dual-Citizenship. I still think his info would be compartmentalized until he had full Federation citizenship.

Nog is an Academy-trained Starfleet officer, therefore he has the same rights and privileges as anyone else of his rank. The fact that he is a Ferengi is irrelevant. He's a "born and bred" part of Starfleet - that's all that matters.

(It was only relevant when Nog was applying for the Academy. At that time he needed a sponsor, because the Ferengi are not Federation members. But once Nog DID get in, and graduated, he automatically received all of the rights and access that anyone of his rank gets.)

Well, the issue that Nathan and I were discussing is that, taking real-life as a mirror, that doesn't necessarily follow. In real life, non-citizen members of the US military, at least, do have the occasional greater restriction than citizen members. And while I haven't yet researched it, I can imagine that the same applies in other countries that also allow non-citizens to join their militaries.

I don't believe it's ever been firmly and explicitly established either way, either whether Nog does have full and equal access at his current status (though given his position, that would seem to follow) or whether he has always had full and equal access at every rank he's had from the Academy onwards. It's certainly within the bounds of believability that Ensign Nog did not have the same level of access or the same security clearances as a Federation citizen in Starfleet would have had at an equivalent point in their career.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top