J
Jetfire
Guest
I thought there was a Moon Knight movie coming out??? If not there should be.
I would want a Namor movie to be a period piece set in 1939 and include Kirby-esque sea creatures attacking NYC. And if the movie needed a "hero" character I nominate the original Human Torch, or tie it in to the Captain America movie somehow. Hell, for that matter-- an Invaders movie?Indeed. I want to see Namor mess up New York. Well, any coastal city will do. Or all of them at once. The film writes itself.^Captain America is out in 2011 as part of the larger Avengers strand (along with Iron Man, Thor, The Incredible Hulk etc).
Sub-Mariner could be interesting, as long as they are true to the character and admit that he is no hero.
Feige confirmed that while Fox owns the Johnny Storm Human Torch, Marvel Studios retains the rights to the android Human Torch, and Feige actually used the Torch as an example of what makes the Marvel version of WWII actually be the Marvel version of WWII (but he also said that he just wasn't sure if they would use him).
...
The only member of The Invaders who is pretty much guaranteed to be left out is Namor, who as far as I know is part of the Fantastic Four package at Fox.
That's interesting, how can Fox own Namor when he neither appears nor is mentioned in the movies?
That's interesting, how can Fox own Namor when he neither appears nor is mentioned in the movies?
It's because they know that getting international audiences to see Captain America may be a hard sell, so they're trying to bind it as closely as possible to the larger Marvel filmverse.In this case I think that's largely because it was, at least originally, supposed to be released mere weeks before The Avengers.And in the tradition of "X-Men Origins: Wolverine," "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" and "James Bond Origins: Casino Royale Begins: The Beginning," we'll be getting...
The First Avenger: Captain America.
Depending on how you define "b-list", he could be said to be. He's kept his own title, but it's generally a moderate seller at most. And outside of comics, his profile is way, way lower than guys like Superman or Spider-Man.Iron Man has never been a B lister in comic books.
Eh, make it slam-bang action and fun, and you'll get butts in seats. The Hollywood liberals shouldn't overthink such things. And if they're really worried, it's possible to just translate the title "Captain America" so that it's something else in a foreign language.
A Black Captain America? Maybe it's time.
In Captain America vol. 4, #28, an Isaiah Bradley from an alternate Earth became Captain America [...] he was elected president and served two terms.
No, that wouldn't work at all with his backstory.A Black Captain America? Maybe it's time.
Apart? That's his whole raison d'etre, go America! attitude of World War II. He was a simple propaganda tool, superheroics kicking the Nazis. He may have evolved far far beyond that since then*, juust like G.I. Joe is an international guy based in Belgium or whatever that was.Cap's never really been written as jingoistic (apart from his creation in the 1940s),
According to Turtletrekker a black Captain America's been done before. Alternate universe, yeah, but why not go with that guy?
Because that isn't Captain America. Captain America is Steve Rogers. Bradley is a side character in the mythos with a completely different backstory and nature.According to Turtletrekker a black Captain America's been done before. Alternate universe, yeah, but why not go with that guy?
He's been a completely different character since Lee brought him back in 1964, with the emphasis being on his role as a man out of time/embodiment of the Greatest Generation.Apart? That's his whole raison d'etre, go America! attitude of World War II. He was a simple propaganda tool, superheroics kicking the Nazis.
And Patience Phillips isn't Catwoman... bad example but you get the gist of it. You could simply make Steve Rogers black but the few people who care that Captain is Steve would be upset about that, hence the Isaiah route seems relatively sane. And so on.Because that isn't Captain America. Captain America is Steve Rogers.
Is it entirely a period piece?The first movie being in World War II will help the concept be sold, I think, given that World War II was the "last good war" and American participation in that gets pretty good reviews across the board.
Cap has been "Barak America" since his revivial in the 60s. More or less the symbol of America done correctly. He's the nicest and most fair minded guy you'll ever meet..
Anyway, important thing about perceptions is even what Americans wouldn't see as jingoistic is seen as jingoistic to a foreign audiences. It's precisely the sort of dissonance that got George Bush re-elected twice as it were. If you want to sell a Captain America overseas he's probably got to be relatable to the sort of image of America liked overseas, and given that he dresses himself up in the flag like he's George Bush Sr. casting him in a sorta Obama-ian light isn't too bad an idea.
.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.