Eaglemoss released the sizes, and they get their info right from CBS and the Production teams.
750.5 meters for the Crossfield, and 423 meters for the Walker.
Discovery Size Argument™ thread
- Thread starter F. King Daniel
- Start date
Eaglemoss released the sizes, and they get their info right from CBS and the Production teams.
750.5 meters for the Crossfield, and 423 meters for the Walker.
Ah thank you, I was hunting though the thread, but 17 pages ( most of which are arguments) was a lot of digging. So they are rescaling? I can see that, trek scale has always been messed up.
I don't think so.
Ten -forward never fit, no shuttle bay has ever fit, ships randomly change size depending on which model they are using. The scale has always been sit of the pants and wacky.
I meant that as a response to they are the 'are they rescaling' part.
Ah, that would depend on how big the connie is when we see her wouldn't it? I mean she is pretty much our size base.
Well, Discovery's inner saucer it nearly the exact same size as the TOS Connie's saucer, if you go by the 289 meter figure.
Based on that, I think they are rescaling. They keep making a big deal out of the Connie being a heavy cruiser, I think they are not gonna make her small. This is honestly gonna upset some folks, but mostly the same folks already upset over the look anyhow.
Discovery is primarily a science ship, her being bigger then the Connie doesn't make her the better ship, or better then a cruiser.
This is a fair point, but the Walker class was a frigate or destroyer and she is almost as large. Once more, this is all guess work until we see the connie redesign and see the size. I really would love to see the other ship sizes as well.
Same here, based on the size of that window on the Sarcophagus Ship's bridge, it is going to be huge.
I mean, I'm assuming this is the bridge, it's the only window that seems to match the set's
G
Gonzo
Guest
We need to see the size of the Defiant and ideally Enterprise to really be sure.
Although I have to say the Europa looked a fair size even though it was all saucer.
Official sizes would be nice to have as I doubt a 20 year old ship would be the largest in the fleet, if the Discovery is larger I expect others to be as well.
Since we are discriminating here, does size measurements from CBS could as canon?
Burnham says something like "That ship's bridge is larger than most of our ships." Which could be interpretted as "their bridge is larger than our bridge" but I initially took it as "We have STARSHIPS smaller than their bridge module." Both would be equally true, IMO.Same here, based on the size of that window on the Sarcophagus Ship's bridge, it is going to be huge.
I mean, I'm assuming this is the bridge, it's the only window that seems to match the set's
Ya know, if you take the cut outs out of the saucer, it shrinks a good bit , I would think.
Similar threads
