I wonder what the actors are thinking. Are they wanting to get away from the show as quick as possible or do they approve of the changes. I could see some major cast changes going into season 3, maybe even this year.
Jason
The only thing that's changing is who the showrunner is. The actors are still getting their scripts. They're still dealing with whoever the director in question is for each episode. The actors aren't in the writer's room, so this changes nothing for them.
Why would they want to leave a show that just fired two people for bullying behaviour, especially with the current hollywood trend of calling out such behaviour? My guess is that the actors were not the ones who took the brunt of Harberts and Bergs behaviour but might speak out in solidarity with the affected writers. We'll probably see some comments from the cast over the next few days.
I don't know. They are still people so they must have some kind of relationship with them that is kind of personal. Maybe they were friends or just co-workers or they hated their guts because they didn't like how their character was being written. Of course it might also come down to who hired them. If a outsider comes in they might have no desire to do what the old showrunners were doing with a character which in turn might piss of the actor if they make changes.
If that were true, the cast would've jumped ship with Fuller's departure. You're underestimating just how much positive and negative influence a showrunner has on a series. They've got about the same importance as a director has with a feature film. Negative, pushy, micromanaging, pains-in-the-ass to work for don't keep people around them for long before the cast or crew get fed up with it - case-in-point: Don P. Bellisario on NCIS.Of course it might also come down to who hired them.
The writers are in a different department. I don't know if they visit the actual set but, if they don't visit that much, then the actors have very little interaction with the writers. Not enough that it would would make them leave.
For the actors: the head writer did not cast them. The casting director cast them. The producers cast them. The head writers and the lead producers are not one and the same.
The head writer/showrunner actually is responsible for casting the roles in a pilot/series, along with the show's executive producer(s). Casting directors only suggest actors for the parts.
It's possible but we don't know what their realtionship with the writers were. They could have treated the actors better than their fellow writers. If that is the case then they might not have cared about the other stuff as long as the scripts kept coming in and they liked how their character was being written.
Jason
Yep.That being the case, then wouldn't it have been Bryan Fuller at the beginning of the series?
The writers are in a different department. I don't know if they visit the actual set but, if they don't visit that much, then the actors have very little interaction with the writers. Not enough that it would would make them leave.
For the actors: the head writer did not cast them. The casting director cast them. The producers cast them. The head writers and the lead producers are not one and the same.
And, as mickmike said, people are starting to finally push back against bullies. And it's about time. No one wants to side with someone toxic unless they're benefiting from the toxicity. Before you say something about the actors wanting to suck up to Berg or Haberts, they would only want to do that -- if they hypothetically did -- so that they could keep their job or get in good with them. They already have their job as actors and Berg and Haberts are no longer people they'd want to get in good with now, even if they wanted to.
I know everyone likes a juicy story and wants more sensationalism from the sensationalism that's already there but two showrunners, who a lot people probably didn't like, were fired and that's likely as far as it goes.
Who was the showrunner on " Ash vs the Evil Dead?" I know Kurtzman has a connection to Tapert and Rami so maybe he knows the person who ran that show during either it's first or it's second season. I know they switched showrunner but don't recall the names or their resumes. Either way I think both need a job and since I loved that show it seems like a good fit maybe.
Well if the internet is to go by I hear Kathleen Kennedy will be needing a new job soon! Who knows?Actually I am not looking forward to some of the more toxic complaining that is bound to happen but otherwise I am glad they might be bringing in a new person or person's to fix some of the problems with the show both fro ma creative angle and the behind the scenes asshole stuff.
Of course in sound logical thinking they choose to do this, 5 episodes in. Sure no tonal shift at all will be noticed after episode 5 and the second half of the season. Also no bottle shows because they blew to much of the money already.Any chance they might have the ole Berman era cave sets in storage?
My choice would be Cotto or Moore or someone mentioned Roxxan Dawson. Would be a interesting choice but doesn't that job usually go more towards people who have a history of being a writer instead of simply a director and actor? Another choice is Joss Whedon. I don't know what he is doing right now but he knows how to write strong female characters and do humor and drama and action and all that stuff.
Jason
This came completely out of left field, but isn't likely (IMO) to result in much narrative change.
Kurtzman is a talentless hack. You wonder how he keeps getting work. He seems to be well connected.
I'm not sure how to take this news. It's hard to imagine this show could get any worse than it already is.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.