But ...but...they're BIG sets! And expensive!!!If that's all you're talking about then it's all the money, and nothing to do with the designs.
And old James Bond movies are the very cutting edge of technology and cinematic design.
But ...but...they're BIG sets! And expensive!!!If that's all you're talking about then it's all the money, and nothing to do with the designs.
Still doesnt look like Crossfield to me.. definitely looks like BLE at the end though.It also looks like I59 so I'm guessing it's just a very bad angle/photo to take anything from.
The clearer version upthread gives "USS Discovery" and "Crossfield Class"
No one at any point has suggested that the science of either Trek or Avatar is not fantasy. We're discussing the design of sets and fake instruments.
Avatar's designs look like spaces and gadgets that might work.
Whether or not I agree with you on that, that's not what I called bullcrap on.I did the legwork, had the facts, even surprised many I'm sure with a lot of revenue sources you never thought of but I took into account because of research over the last year. The range is $520-650 million on the high end. Any way you slice it, it has made a profit, only the exact amount is in question.
It did make a profit, even those arguing with me about it admitted it.
Yup, they're timeless. Look at his production art.But ...but...they're BIG sets! And expensive!!!
And old James Bond movies are the very cutting edge of technology and cinematic design.
The show will get nominated for awards for production design, guaranteed. BTW, someone should've told youthe way sets are lit tend to be differnet from when they are shot for the screen and for a photo session. Remind me not to ask you about production design opinions.
RAMA
I appreciate your zeal, so much so that you have decided to plant your flag in this thread and gush over the production design in post after post, but at the end of the day this is merely your opinion. When it comes to suggesting awards as above, I'd say you are taking your personal opinion and spinning it way out of proportion. These designs may look "expensive" (other than the misaligned shingles in the transproter room) but they are simultaneously gaudy and generic. It just doesn't...gel as a unified work of art, even if you disregard canon violations. If they get an award it's just a sign of how colorblind Hollywood has become.
They might get an award for the sarcophagus ship, which, if you stop worrying about canon, is nice. But even there, it's ripping off HR Giger.
Ew, no.It really is a shame that they couldn't involve some of the other set designers from Abrams's movies.
![]()
Gorgeous
LolHow can you tell? That is incredibly dark. I hope that is a half-power shot, or else I'll be squinting the whole time trying to make out what is going on.
It looks more like the Enterprise-E bridge than anything from "The Cage".
Ew, no.
Well maybe the guy who did the Vengeance
But not the Konnie.
I just don't see it.![]()
It's ok guys.. You're allowed to deviate from your old script when presented with new information.I just don't see it.![]()
You just need a shot of uncritical boosterism.
I agree that this looks really cool! The angular and somewhat minimal design match the exterior of the ship perfectly.![]()
Gorgeous
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.