My thinking is that the bridge will look a little smaller on screen, since motion picture cameras and various lenses, lighting, angles, etc. will compress it a little. It's quite different than a still lens.
Well the U.S. navy did study the TOS bridge layout and found it very functional back in the 1960ies:
https://books.google.com/books?id=ASoDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA74&lpg=PA74&dq=U.S.+navy+studied+Star+Trek+Bridge+layout&source=bl&ots=IFvJgP_ivk&sig=2DGZSMqQ-5N0VC8nu_M5soM4uvM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUl5TJyP_VAhXiylQKHTNjBAkQ6AEIPjAG#v=onepage&q=U.S. navy studied Star Trek Bridge layout&f=false
Clear view of the screen? There is some sense in making rooms that all have to see the same big screen or central focus staggered in some way. Picard would have Data and Wesley's heads taking up most of the screen.So, there's all of an eight-inch step-down from the outer stations to the two forward consoles in the "pit."
From a functional perspective, what's the point there?
Clear view of the screen? There is some sense in making rooms that all have to see the same big screen or central focus staggered in some way. Picard would have Data and Wesley's heads taking up most of the screen.
On the TOS bridge, isn't there the upper level for the outer stations, then a step down to Kirk's chair, which is up on a platform to look just above and past Sulu and Chekov?So, there's all of an eight-inch step-down from the outer stations to the two forward consoles in the "pit."
From a functional perspective, what's the point there?
From a functional perspective, what's the point there?
They can smile!
Aaaaaand.....we get a generic bridge design that could fit in ANY scifi show...with an as uninteresting color scheme as possible. I´d never thought I´d ever prefer the new movies "Apple Style Bridge" to anything. Would it have hurt to add some different colors to the console displays...instead of just "make it blue"?
I actually like that it's so big. Somehow makes it look more realistic to me as a workplace where everyone needs room for their station and you can realistically have a conversation on one side without disturbing the others. I look at it basically as an office room in space. Or a NASA flight control room like this one.
It's “The Cage”-era Trek – they will shout their lines anyway.Unless you're the helmsman and need to talk to either the captain or navigator.![]()
It's “The Cage”-era Trek – they will shout their lines anyway.![]()
On the TOS bridge, isn't there the upper level for the outer stations, then a step down to Kirk's chair, which is up on a platform to look just above and past Sulu and Chekov?
Those two being more cramped makes sense. They were both quite a bit smaller than most of the other ship's we'd seen, so they wouldn't have room for big, spacious bridges.Looking back, some of the bridges in Star Trek have been rather cramped, like the bridge of the Defiant or even the NX-01, which I love, but isn't necessarily spacious.
^^By the way, there is some open floor space seen here in this image, too.
It is the cockpit of a Volkswagen Beetle compared to a Chevy Suburban.![]()
If someone doesn't scream: "DEFLECTORS! FULL INTENSITY!" at least once - or they instead just say "Raise shields/Shields up!"; I'll be very disappointed.CHECK THE CIRCUIT!!!
It's way off.I don't lknow if IMDB is credible evidence, but this page claims ENT had a $5M per episode budget.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.