I love him. I cannot understand why he's never been included in a movie.
Fully concur.
I didn't think the Qs were relatively well-handled in Voyager, I wish there was an option to reflect "I love TNG-era Q."
Q & A is also a good book.
I love him. I cannot understand why he's never been included in a movie.
That's certainly quite possible, although Roddenberry only came up with Q after Paramount revealed that they wanted a 2 hour pilot, so he worked this new character in with his farpoint storyline.I think that was the insperation for Q
Did you like Q or did you find him annoying? And by annoying I mean that an episode was more or less ruined by his presence.
Works for me.A. Ruined by his annoyingness.
B. Ruined as a story, for no danger is ever really a danger if Q can snap his finger and undo things; no decision is ever pivotal for the same reason.
I loved the idea of an omnipotent being meddling around with humans, to give us a bigger picture of ourselves and smack-down our self-importance a bit. He never really came across as a villian to me, but definitely a force, and ultimately I think, a positive one.
Q was perfectly played by John de Lancie, conveying superiority without a hint of smugness, conveying emotion that looked kind of sincere, but you never really were sure, and warming up to humanity (or at least the concept of humanity) over the course of TNG without being watered-down. I also think he worked best on TNG as opposed to DS9 or VOY simply because of his dynamic with Picard.
I didn't like Q at first, but then he grew on me I suppose.
But my favovrite scene is still the one from Q-Less when Sisko slapped him. "Now why didn't Picard ever think of that?" <G>
Think both Sisko and Janeway handled Q better than Picard.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.