On the bright side, at least this all happened at a time when there weren't 24-hour news and gossip channels and websites to play up the animosity between the two actors and blow it way out of proportion.
BalthierTheGreat said:
Well, not only that, but I think Shatner was about 30 when all this happened...
Cary L. Brown said:
On the other hand, the stuff that I saw come from Doohan turned me from a fan of his into a detractor of his. James Doohan, sadly, became embittered. He never really had a career to speak of after Star Trek, and he blamed Bill Shatner for that. But that's TOTALLY unfair. He might have been "typecast" but it may also be that he simply mismanaged his own career, too. It's easy to blame someone else.
That, really, was my point too... but made a bit more eloquently than I'd put it, I think.A beaker full of death said:
Cary L. Brown said:
On the other hand, the stuff that I saw come from Doohan turned me from a fan of his into a detractor of his. James Doohan, sadly, became embittered. He never really had a career to speak of after Star Trek, and he blamed Bill Shatner for that. But that's TOTALLY unfair. He might have been "typecast" but it may also be that he simply mismanaged his own career, too. It's easy to blame someone else.
Doohan definitely carried a grudge, but it was really the fans that put it there. As Star Trek became a phenomenon during the 70s and the convention circuit was born, Doohan had 30 years of fans blowing smoke up his ass, til it was easy to convince himself that he and Shatner were co-stars rather than that he was the show's excitable repairman. He started out jealous (I remember a '70s interview in which he admitted he'd rather play the Captain), and the fans fuelled it. Shatner's personality certainly didn't help the situation.
I want to make clear that I once shared a drink with Doohan and found him to be a lovely and charming man. I believe he was quite a fine fellow, a talented actor and, of course, a war hero. But this was a blind spot that really brought out his worst.
Cary L. Brown said:
I had the opportunity to sit next to Shatner on a plane once... got the upgrade to 1st-class and had the window seat next to his aisle seat. I can only speak from my own experience, and my exposure to him was limited (I tend to respect the privacy of others and, other than telling him I appreciated his work, didn't talk "shop" at all). But he was, frankly, a really NICE guy from what little I was able to see... polite and considerate of a total stranger like me, and just really friendly to boot.
A beaker full of death said:
When they were honored at the TVLand awards in Doohan's last year, Shatner quite visibly hovered close to Doohan and helped him off the stage as the cameras panned out. It was probably the most genuine, sincere thing I've ever seen Shatner do.
Stanley Kubrick got labeled as "reclusive" for exactly the same reason. He refused to talk to media or do media events.Mr Awe said:
^^^
"Reclusive" gets bandied about because Armstrong didn't do the traditional media events. Instead, he lives a busy, productive life that has involved education and being a business leader. That's not reclusive under any definition.
People confuse "not doing media events" with reclusive. Or at least, the media, not surprisingly, portay it that way! Hey, you're not playing ball with us, you must be reclusive! Ha!
Mr Awe
middyseafort said:
Interestingly enough, in the early development of the first season, George Clayton Johnson pushed that Kirk and Scotty have a close friendship instead of Kirk and Bones. According to him, in an interview in one of the Trek issues of Cinefantastque, it made sense that the Captain and the engineer would be close comrades since they both had the most vested interest in the ship. Roddenberry, however, felt that it would've been better for Kirk and Bones to be close friends.
If things had gone another way, perhaps we would've seen a Big Three of Kirk, Spock and Scotty.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.