Ok so shouldn't the first Defiant in the series be the Defiant A and the second Defiant B since there was a Constitution class ship called Defiant?
The NX-74205 would have been Defiant-A if it had carried forward the registry of the Constitution-class starship (NCC-1764). Since Starfleet did not use the same registry for both ships, no, it would not have been Defiant-A. According to Memory Alpha, Ronald D. Moore stated in the Deep Space Nine Companion that it was his intention that the Sao Paulo would be known as the Defiant-A in-universe, but the costs involved in redesignating the model (and not being able to use stock footage of the NX-74205) prevented that intention from being realized on-screen.
Ok so shouldn't the first Defiant in the series be the Defiant A and the second Defiant B since there was a Constitution class ship called Defiant?
Is there a precedent on ships not called Enterprise following that pattern?
Is there a precedent on ships not called Enterprise following that pattern?
No, never. At least not in canon. The Enterprise is a special case.
Besides, the "original Dauntless" would have been NX-01, so that wouldn't have worked now...
We could just as easily say that Riker was spelling out the registry because it wasn't a valid registry and proof that they were encountering an alien mystery to be solved.Riker was pretty clear that he considered NCC-1305-E a valid registry: he spelled it out, letter by letter, and quoted it as proof that the ship was the Yamato.
And that's all that matters.The registry was retconned later, yes.
Or the hull registry of first experimental starship of the Federation Starfleet might have been NX-100, and the Voyager crew didn't see any correlation between the USS Dauntless and Starfleet's first Warp 5 starship. None of the Voyager's crew may have been history buffs...Besides, the "original Dauntless" would have been NX-01, so that wouldn't have worked now...
Why not? The first experimental starship of the UFP Starfleet could well have been USS Dauntless, NX-01 (or NCC-01).
Is there a precedent on ships not called Enterprise following that pattern?
No, never. At least not in canon. The Enterprise is a special case.
Well, that isn't quite correct. The USS Relativity had a -G. Two "fake" Starfleet ships had letters, the faked USS Yamato (-E)and the USS Dauntless (-A). No one mentioned it as something extraordinary when they saw these ships, which might mean it is more common than just for the Enterprise.
Riker was pretty clear that he considered NCC-1305-E a valid registry: he spelled it out, letter by letter, and quoted it as proof that the ship was the Yamato.
The reason why they had to call the ship the Defiant was because the USS Ben Sisko's Mutha Fucking Pimp-Hand was too long.
Umm, the only Enterprise that has ever been said to be "flagship" is the E-D. The others were apparently just regular starships, without specific command roles or flag officers or special diplomatic status or whatever.they'd want to keep it restricted to the Enterprise, since Kirk's era, it's always been the flagship
the Excelsior-class successor
^
The Relativity was a ship in the future, and, as ya said, the other two were fakes.
Umm, the only Enterprise that has ever been said to be "flagship" is the E-D. The others were apparently just regular starships, without specific command roles or flag officers or special diplomatic status or whatever...
a single item from a related group considered as the most important, often in establishing a public image
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.