• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Dec Challenge, Lenses

Dulak

Commander
Red Shirt
This story didn't come out quite like I'd planned, so please be warned. It was a diffucult challenge to wrap myself around, so I went in a different direction. If you like reporters, you may not want to read this. It either verges on, or goes way over the top, depending on your perspective. It may be a little preachy, but if it starts any discussions or comments then so be it. Here it is, enjoy, I hope...



September 5th, 2475
100th Anniversary of end of First Dominion War
Risa Retirement District, Veterans section

Lisa Feller, senior journalist for the Federation Times, stood up from the makeup chair and tore off the paper that had been protecting her simple yet tasteful blouse. Brushing a stubborn brown hair from her forehead, she took one last look in a proffered hand mirror and exited the small shuttle.

Her vanity made her see clearly the narrow crows feet wrinkles starting at the edges of her eyes and mouth, but her pride kept her from seeking medical treatment for the early signs of aging. She had more important things to do.

Estimates were that the Federation alone was loosing two to three thousand veterans per day of one of the most costly conflicts in Alpha Quadrant history. Many of those left, men and women who served long before most citizens were even born, were beginning to talk about the war. It was as if they feared finally the loss of knowledge they had kept closely guarded for decades. A subtle shift was happening, from quiet remembrance of those who did not make it through that conflict, to a more vocal honoring of those compatriots dying all around them currently.

One of the students in a low-level journalism class Feller substitute-instructed for had brought up an idea for a documentary based on interviews with surviving veterans due to the recent loss of a great uncle or some such relation, and that student’s desire to learn more of a conflict only briefly talked about in the last few months of the uncle’s life.

Lisa had dismissed the idea as old news and redirected the class discussion towards other directions, but secretly she had decided to take the idea for her own and make it the capstone of her career. One final flair for the dramatic, then she would ride off into the sunset as it were, and enjoy her retirement.

She strode up purposefully to her cameraman, leaned in close and said, “Remember, when I ask the old codger what his most upsetting memory was, when he starts to get choked up, be sure to focus in on me and catch the tear that runs down my cheek.”

The cameraman nodded, “Gotcha.”

This was going to be cake. Interview a series of veterans and get them all choked up on camera while thinking about the horrors of war. Some of them might even admit that the Federation should not have jumped into the conflict so easily and should have more strongly pursued diplomacy first.

She walked in and demurely introduced herself to her first interviewee, a Sean Davis, former Starfleet Marine and at 124, one who probably didn’t have much time left.

“Mr. Davis, a pleasure to meet you. First off let me thank you for allowing me to interview you for this documentary. It’s something that should have been done a long time ago.”

Davis stood as she approached and waited for her to offer her hand before shaking it, firmly. “No, thank you, young lady.”

She laughed briefly, “It’s been a long time since anyone has called me that. You make me feel like a school girl.” Lisa briefly and gently rested her hand on the man’s arm.

Sitting, Lisa adjusted her angle on the chair so she was half facing Davis. She usually had some sort of rapport by this point, but as she glanced into his eyes, she couldn’t help feeling that she was being sized up, and wasn’t all that sure that his opinion was favorable. Oh well, time to get started.

“Roll em,” she said to the cameraman. The operator signaled with outstretched fingers, counting from three to one and then pointing at Lisa.

Smiling at the camera, she began. “This is Lisa Feller, and it is my privilege to have with me here today Mr. Sean Davis, former Federation Marine Sergeant and veteran of the Dominion Incursion.”

Busy talking, Feller failed to notice Davis’s jaw tighten at the word incursion, but before she could continue, he interrupted with one word, spoken quietly but still loud enough to be picked up by the holographic sound system. “War.”

Feller was paying so much attention to her own delivery that while she heard the man speak, she didn’t comprehend what he’d said. Stopping her monolog, hoping for some juicy tidbit, she asked, “What was that, Mr. Davis?”

Davis repeated himself, elaborating. “I said War, Maam. It was the Dominion War. An Incursion in an attack that penetrates enemy territory. Do you know how many incursions into Federation territory the Dominion made during the War?”

As the blood started draining from her face, Lisa Feller, attempted to regain her composure and failing, croaked, “Well, I...”

“Five hundred sixty-three separate incidences, not counting scouting missions.” Davis answered for her.

Covering quickly, Lisa complimented the man on his knowledge. “That’s quite an impressive memory Mr. Davis. After all this time, you still remember. Since most people weren’t around then, myself included,” Feller chuckled “I was hoping that you and some of your fellow veterans of that horrible time could share with us your memories. Other than painful memories, what is something you remember the most?”

Davis thought for a moment, then replied. “I remember the sheer joy that ran through my unit when it was over, when we had won.”

Feller pursed her lips slightly, “So many deaths, does anyone really win in war?”

Davis didn’t even pause before answering, “The Federation, and its ideals were preserved. We stopped the Dominion in its conquest of the Alpha Quadrant. Ms. Feller, I joined the Marines because I believe that there are things worth fighting for, some things worth winning. I still believe it. If you’re looking for someone torn by ambiguity, you’ve come to the wrong place.”

Just then the door swished open quietly and an elderly Cardassian woman entered. She walked over to Davis, kissed him gently on the forehead. Looking at Feller, the woman shook her head slowly. “Another reporter Sean?”

The old man laughed, “I’ve got to have my hobbies Callie.”

Then it was his turn to look at a baffled Lisa Feller, “Excuse me, Ms. Feller. Allow me to introduce my wife, Calakat. Callie, this is Lisa Feller from the Federation Times.”

Seeing the Cardassian woman incline her head ever so slightly in her direction, Feller knew she had to break the ice or botch the interview. Still, her mind was reeling that her intern had failed to notify her that her interviewee was married to a Cardassian.

She had planned to ask Davis about how he and his Marines were treated while occupying Cardassia following the war, when the former star power was treated as nothing more than a vassal state to the Federation. Apparently, that line of questioning wasn’t going to be very productive.

Seeing Feller fumble, Calakat smiled slightly, and interjected herself into the interview. “Since he won’t bring it up, did you happen to read the citation for the Starfleet Medal of Honor my husband received during the alliance liberation of Cardassia?”

Lisa Feller became even more puzzled, “Weren’t millions of Cardassian civilians killed in that attack? If the Federation had pursued diplomatic solutions, those deaths....”

Calakat’s voice tightened, “The Cardassian underground was engaging in your highly touted ‘passive’ resistance against the Dominion occupation. Shutting down power stations, disrupting supply lines, etc. In response the Dominion destroyed Lakarian City and killed two million Cardassians.”

“We were supposed to buckle and be good slaves then, but when military commanders and more populace turned against them, the Dominion decided to destroy as much of Cardassia as they could.”

Staying obviously agitated, Calakat continued. “If it weren’t for the alliance fleet, the civilian casualties would have been much higher than the eight hundred million it was.”

Feller sat stunned and listened to the Cardassian’s tirade, only thinking of a question through sheer luck. “I didn’t think there were any Federation forces on Cardassia during that battle?”

Sean stood up and put his arm around his wife’s shoulder, comforting her, “There weren’t supposed to be, but due to the botched boarding attempt of a Dominion capitol ship, my platoon ended up on the surface. The one who should have got a medal was the transporter operator that managed to re-materialize us on the surface before the Chesapeake was destroyed. They must not have been able to get the Dominion ship to cooperate in dropping its shields. We’ll never know now.”

“My men regrouped and fought alongside a group of mostly unarmed civilians struggling to protect their children from Breen death squads.”

Feller tapped her stylus against the PADD she held loosely in the hands out of nervousness. “Sergeant, what made you side with the Cardassians? For all you knew at the time, they were the enemy. Aren’t Marines trained to shoot first and ask questions later?” Too late, she realized her mistake, and the angle she had missed.

Davis didn’t miss it. Shaking his head, “If you even have to ask that question, this interview is over. When you see just one parent throwing herself in front of a Breen disruptor to save her child, it becomes easily obvious who the enemy is. Now if you will excuse us.”

With that, Sgt. Sean Davis, former Federation Marine, stood and escorted his wife from the room. The two didn’t even glance at Feller as they left.

The cameraman started to chuckle quietly, but was cut short by a scathing glare from Feller, “Just erase that. And get makeup in here, I need a powder touch-up.”

An hour later it became apparent that her next interviewee wasn’t going to show. Several attempts at contacting others on Feller’s list left her assistant shaking her head and shrugging her shoulders.

Frowning, but with nose held high, Lisa Feller strode out of the room, and towards her shuttle. She would have to regroup, and find others to talk to.
 
Very nice. It's a good that you showed how the future of the Federation might look on it's past, much like how the US views the Vietnam War as a Conflict, yet my stepfather who was in the marines at that time will tell you it was a War and nothing short. You might expand on this to show how other things had changed, like the voyager episode where the doctor got left behind and reactivated several hundred years later on a planet where they saw voyager as a warship.

As they say, History is written by the victors.
 
Nicely done. An excellent counter-point to the reporter’s revisionist history. Once a Marine, always a Marine. Ooooo-rah! :bolian:
 
Nice story! You provided a different perspective on the war from the retired Marine and his wife. Most stories are "naval" battles. Good to hear from a ground-pounder!
 
Damn that is one unlikeable bitch! :eek:

I find it difficult to think that anyone would call the Dominion war an incursion, not something that spanned the Federation, saw Earth bombed and Betazed occupied.

I thought the characters were a bit too black and white, but nicely written anyway :thumbsup:
 
Wow, that's way more positive feedback than I was expecting. Thanks everyone.

Crackers: As far as the black and white issue...I did in on purpose to make my point, without having to wade through 5600 words with characters wearing shades of gray. I was having a tough enough time with the challenge to have to insert ambiguity. At least you got that Lisa was not warm and cuddly.

Now if next months challenge involves ambiguity...i'm all over it.
 
Dulak said:
Wow, that's way more positive feedback than I was expecting. Thanks everyone.

Crackers: As far as the black and white issue...I did in on purpose to make my point, without having to wade through 5600 words with characters wearing shades of gray. I was having a tough enough time with the challenge to have to insert ambiguity. At least you got that Lisa was not warm and cuddly.

Now if next months challenge involves ambiguity...i'm all over it.

Hey no worries I figured it was most likely intentional, and you're right, shades of grey usually require more wordage :)
 
Hmm.

To be honest, I didn't care for this--mostly because I think you picked the wrong medium for your message.

This is pretty clearly an allegory of today's "mainstream media" and its coverage of the conflict in Iraq. The problem is, the allegory doesn't work, because there is no parallel between the real and fictional conflicts. You're comparing apples and oranges.

From what I saw on DS9, the Dominion War was total war--the interstellar equivalent of World War II. And I find it difficult to believe that, even decades after the war, Feller would have any kind of audience for her views--that there would be a sizeable group of people within the Federation who would view the Dominion War in such a negative light.

The types of wars that attract that kind of controversy have always been faraway conflicts that include three elements: they do not involve any immediate threat to the home country; they seem to be fought for mixed or unworthy motives; and they seem to involve a lot of violence against civilians.

In American history, this would include the Spanish-American War, the Philippine Insurrection, and the Vietnam War; in British history, the Boer War (1899-1902); and in French history, the Algerian War (1954-62).

To take the example I know best: some British Liberals denounced the Boer War as an illegal war of aggression and conquest. They accused the British government of carrying out the will of a small cabal of gold and diamond firms, and they were especially incensed by reports that Boer civilians were being kept in concentration camps, where large numbers of them were dying from disease. The leader of the Liberal Party, Henry Campbell-Bannerman, denounced the government for employing what he called "methods of barbarism" in South Africa. The Conservatives replied to these criticisms by claiming that anti-war Liberals were "pro-Boers" and traitors. Sound familiar?

The controversies arising from conflicts like these become especially acute when conscripts are sent overseas to fight, as they were in Vietnam and Algeria. Indeed, the political crisis in France over Algeria became so severe that it brought down the Fourth Republic. The present controversy in the States over stop-loss orders is minor compared to what might happen if a draft was imposed for the war in Iraq.

It's true that people have a largely negative view of the First World War--but that view developed only because of the catastrophic events that came after 1918--the Great Depression and the Second World War, which the First World War was accused of causing.

Had you taken some time in your story to sketch out a similar scenario--had you shown, for example, that victory in the Dominion War had been Pyrrhic for the Federation--then I could see how someone like Feller could exist.

But as it stands, all this story tells me is that you don't really understand or sympathize with people's reasons for opposing conflicts like the invasion of Iraq. And without that kind of psychological insight, your story just is not believeable, and your allegory is not persuasive.

And that's a shame, because it's well-written, with interesting characters, and a potentially great subject matter. Too bad.
 
Ok, normally I don't get into the poo flinging in an online venue, but as someone who is currently in the military, I feel that I have to respond. It's true that the Dominion War was more of an interstellar WWII, but that doesn't change the fact that our view of history is flawed. It's like the statement of if you have 10 people viewing an accident you'll have 10 different stories. Now I understand that WWII was a horrible war that cost many lives, same with the fictional Dominion War, but if someone hadn't been in the military, or was to young to remember it, they wouldn't understand it the same way as the soldiers, and the family of the soldiers do. Thats where the reporter comes in. Years after the way is the reporter, that only seems to casually be interested in her story, and thats only to get ratings. I think it's perfectly plausible for her to have that attitude. I think it perfectly captures the media's attitude towards the military. They see us as a way to attract ratings, and thats about it.
 
I think you're both right-and wrong. Which is to say that ANY conflict will have its non-supporters either during or after. And as time passes and the original people who truly knew how something was pass away the truth is distorted. Didn't you ever play "telephone" as a kid? Probably one of the most dramatic fictional examples of the difference time makes was expressed in the B5 episode "Deconstruction of Falling Stars" . So the attitude of the reporter is believable in this story, in my opinion.
 
Frankly I find the notion that *only* soldiers understand war to be a very frightening concept.

Following that concept through to its logical conclusion, we should take the word of an SS concentration camp gaurd over a Jewish survivor. Extreme I know but that seems to be where the argument leads!

I'm no great fan of the media, but God knows what kind of a world we'd live in without it revealing what some (emphasis SOME) soldiers get up to, as well as actually revealing heroism too.

At the end of the day, as in every walk of life, there are shitty journalists and great journalists, just as there are shitty soldiers and great soldiers.
 
Thank you Camelopard,

I really liked your reply. My issue is never with people who thoughfully and with knowledge to back them up, take up a stance against a conflict, be it a full scale war or 'police action.' I am bothered by people who take up a cause du jour merely because it seems popular with a certain political leaning, and spout off things not based on real study on their part.

I understand that this isn't the place to start a discussion like this, but since you felt compelled to write such a lenghy and detailed reply to my little story, I thought I'd answer. You seem like you'd be fun to have discussions with.

When I started out writing the story, honestly, I had in mind the current trend of such large numbers of WWII veterans passing. Unfortunately, along with the revisionist ideas that the holocaust never happened (thankfully a very derided and quacky fringe idea) and the comparing as apples to apples the internment of ethnic Japanese (on the West coast only) with Nazi concentration and death camps, there is a disturbing trend among some journalists to do just what Feller did in my story concerning WWII, and that is do find and present as representative from the entire millions of veterans who served, those who were exeptionally traumatized by the war, and to use that trauma to forward the viewpoint that no war is worth fighting. I believe, and I may be mistaken, that the highly touted documentary by Ken Burns is an example of this. He admitted his leanings in this direction in an interview that I read, claiming that WWII was the "worst war," and that the Greatest generation (you know, the ones that stopped Japan and the Nazis) was also the "Worst Generation," because they killed sixty million.

That was what I used as a starting point. It is interesting that the same people that are most vocal in their decrying these small, overseas conflicts, are also the same people that think all war is unnecesary (at least the ones I've talked to on college campuses..) But not all of them.

Your argument made sense, but where you lost me was when you said, "But as it stands, all this story tells me is that you don't really understand or sympathize with people's reasons for opposing conflicts like the invasion of Iraq. And without that kind of psychological insight, your story just is not believeable, and your allegory is not persuasive." Because I do empathize with people who do not agree with the conflicts, I just don't agree with them when they have no reason that is generated by any degree of thought.

The situation in Iraq actually played very little into the generation of my story, other than it keeps getting compared to Vietnam... but only from the aspect that we are fighting a "no win situation."

As far as Vietnam goes, I only have this to say. My father was a Marine who served in Vietnam. Not only did he give his life for his country, he gave it attempting to give the Vietnamese people the same opportunity for freedom that the rest of the non-communist world has. He served as part of a little known Combined Action Platoon, a Marine program where a squad of Marines lived with and trained a platoon of Vietnamese militia in the defense of their village.

The CAPs, despite a tendency to be overrun by the NVA and VC had the highest rate of extension in country of any military unit (the programs were voluntary until the 1970's). He believed in that mission. Here is his citation for the Navy Cross, the second highest US Military award.

*DORRIS, CLAUDE HESSON
Citation:
The President of the United States takes pride in presenting the Navy Cross (Posthumously) to Claude Hesson Dorris (1547450), Staff Sergeant, U.S. Marine Corps, for extraordinary heroism while serving as the Marine Squad Leader/Advisor of Combined Action Platoon H-6, Third Combined Action Group, III Marine Amphibious Force, in the Republic of Vietnam. During the early morning hours of 7 January 1968, Sergeant Dorris' platoon was defending an outpost in Nuoc Ngot Village, Thua Thien Province. Suddenly, the compound came under a heavy volume of mortar and rocket fire, followed by an aggressive assault by a numerically superior Viet Cong force. The enemy quickly seized the northern wall of the compound as the Marines and Popular Forces soldiers moved to the sandbagged southern wall. Realizing that several Marines had been in their living quarters when the attack commenced, Sergeant Dorris unhesitatingly exposed himself to the hostile fire to ensure that the Marines were manning their fighting positions. Although painfully wounded in both legs soon after the attack commenced, he resolutely crawled from one burning hut to another, ensuring that none of his men had been trapped in the structures. Observing a wounded Vietnamese boy run into the compound, Sergeant Dorris skillfully administered first aid to the child. Despite the enemy fire impacting around him, he fearlessly remained in his dangerously exposed position in an attempt to halt the advancing enemy force until he was mortally wounded by an enemy rocket round. His heroic and timely actions inspired his men and prevented the enemy from overrunning the compound. By his courage, bold initiative, and selfless devotion to duty, Sergeant Dorris upheld the highest traditions of the United States Marine Corps, and the United States Naval Service. He gallantly gave his life for his country.

Two other Marines also received the Navy cross during the same attack, Robert C. Rusher, and John C. Calhoun. Their citations are also available online.

Note: "Observing a wounded Vietnamese boy run into the compound, Sergeant Dorris skillfully administered first aid to the child"

My father, and those in his unit were there, not as part of an invasionary force, nor where they part of an "imperialist" action against the people of Vietnam. They were there to help them.

People in villages protected by CAP's still (secretly) maintain memorials to US Marines and Popular Forces who gave their lives to protect them from Communist insurgency.

I have talked to men who served there. I have done the research.

Do any who didn't serve there remember? Not many.

But that wasn't why I wrote the story I wrote. It was a monthly challenge. I responded. I'm glad you thought it was well written, but please, ask me if you think I wrote a piece for a specific reason.

Dulak
 
Dulak-I have known some vets from Nam. I remember their stories. I have friends from both Gulf Wars-and my brother was in the first one. It was...difficult to read your father's citation. I go with what I said on the last post, but I go now with tears. It isn't easy dealing with war when it affects your family. My bro was Air Force. He won a number of commendations in '91. He was on the ground. You write, I'll read, and Ken Burns is wrong. You could ask my Uncle Ritchie, but he never came back from Sicily.And many of my Polish cousins failed to come back from places like Buchenwald, so if tapping your history helps go with it and the hell with the naysayers.Sorry, read this very late at night and I am emotionally weak right now so my comment sounds kinda sappy and confused. Time for bed.
 
Dulak:

Thank you for your very lengthy and enlightening response. I'm afraid it doesn't change my opinion of your story--but it does improve my opinion of you, personally.

I see now that I was much too hasty in some of my judgments, and I'd like to apologize for that. In particular, I'd like to apologize for saying that your story was "clearly" an allegory of the controversy over Iraq. While I think you will agree that your story can be read that way, and read that way legitimately, I see now that you were grappling with much larger issues when you wrote it. I forgot that works of art and literature can have multiple meanings, and that reader-reception is sometimes not even close to author-intention. I'll be more circumspect in what I say about your stories in the future.

But, as I said above, I'm afraid your story still doesn't resonate with me, for the reasons I mentioned before.

In your reply, you said:

When I started out writing the story, honestly, I had in mind the current trend of such large numbers of WWII veterans passing. Unfortunately, along with the revisionist ideas that the holocaust never happened (thankfully a very derided and quacky fringe idea) and the comparing as apples to apples the internment of ethnic Japanese (on the West coast only) with Nazi concentration and death camps, there is a disturbing trend among some journalists to do just what Feller did in my story concerning WWII, and that is do find and present as representative from the entire millions of veterans who served, those who were exeptionally traumatized by the war, and to use that trauma to forward the viewpoint that no war is worth fighting. I believe, and I may be mistaken, that the highly touted documentary by Ken Burns is an example of this. He admitted his leanings in this direction in an interview that I read, claiming that WWII was the "worst war," and that the Greatest generation (you know, the ones that stopped Japan and the Nazis) was also the "Worst Generation," because they killed sixty million.

I haven't seen Burns' documentary, but I'm familiar with views like the ones you describe here. For example: Paul Fussell, author of a classic work of history and literary criticism, The Great War and Modern Memory, is a pacifist who would agree with such views. Interestingly, he is also a combat veteran of the Second World War, and it was precisely his combat experience that made him a pacifist: he discusses these experiences in another book, Wartime.

One of my colleagues assigned this book in a seminar on the Second World War. (He also assigned E B Sledge's With the Old Breed, both to provide a look at the Pacific Theater, and to balance Fussell's very negative view of the war) What he told me about his students' reactions to Wartime was both interesting and relevant here. He said that none of them agreed with Fussell's thesis, but that they were reluctant to criticize it, because Fussell was a veteran: they thought that his views carried more weight than theirs. And I'm pretty sure that most people would react in somewhat similar fashion.

Which brings me to the essential point I made in my first post (minus my embarrassingly cocksure comments about "clear" allegories): that almost nobody in the Federation would view the Dominion War the way that Feller wants to present it--in the same way that almost nobody in our society views the Second World War in the way that Fussell presents it.

You say you are "bothered by people who take up a cause du jour merely because it seems popular with a certain political leaning, and spout off things not based on real study on their part." Well, so am I. But that doesn't describe someone like Paul Fussell, or (from what I've seen of his work) Ken Burns. Fussell writes from deep personal conviction founded on traumatic personal experience, while Ken Burns has always struck me as a serious filmmaker who does his research. That's why I didn't recognize either of them in your character, Feller.

Feller, as you present her, is vain, superficial, dishonest, and mercenary. She's looking for the "capstone of her career"--a documentary that will bring her both popular and critical acclaim. She wants to exploit the Dominion War's veterans. It seems to me that someone like that would not try to spin the Dominion War the way you describe, unless she thought that such spin would be popular: at least, popular enough that one faction of the chattering classes would be willing to defend her work against its critics.

But like I said: I just don't buy that such a view of the Dominion War would ever become popular, in the same way that Fussell's views of the Second World War have never been shared by many people. And as I said, I can't see such an opinion-shift happening without the sorts of traumas that followed the First World War, which made people see their wartime sacrifices as a waste. In fact, your own story is evidence of the continuing unpopularity of the views you set out to critique.

That's why I came to the conclusion that you were using the Dominion War as a stand-in for a smaller, more controversial conflict. I guessed (wrongly) that this conflict was the Iraq war, but from what you say in your response, I should have guessed Vietnam.

Let me conclude with a few words on my own view of World War II. I'm no pacifist, and I disagree bitterly with Paul Fussell's arguments about World War II. If ever there was a war worth fighting, it was the war against Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Imperial Japan.

(In fact, I would go even farther, and argue that the First World War was justified as well, for much the same reasons--a view that is decidedly less popular nowadays)

Nonetheless, it seems clear to me that the Second World War was, in many ways, humanity's moral nadir--a war in which the good guys weren't necessarily all that good--they were just better than the bad guys. Keep in mind, for example, that the most important member of the Grand Alliance, the Soviet Union, was also one of the worst, most murderous tyrannies in history--and that our victory condemned Eastern Europe to fifty years of communist dictatorship.

Was our alliance with the USSR justified? I would say: absolutely yes. What's more, I would say that even fifty years of communist dictatorship was better for Eastern Europe than what the Nazis had planned for that region. But still, I think you must agree: there was a certain amount of moral complexity in our alliance with Stalin.

And you can find that same moral complexity in the Western Allies' war effort as well. The best example of this complexity is the strategic-bomber crewman. As I ask my classes on war and society: what are we to make of these men? On the one hand, they were unquestionably heroes, who undertook some of the most dangerous, most traumatic missions of the war. Their casualty rates were horrible, and the conditions under which they fought--trapped inside their bomber planes, unable to take cover or even maneuever much--are precisely the conditions which are most conducive to post-traumatic stress disorder. And yet, these heroic young men did their duty and went back, again and again, into that aerial "valley of death" over Germany.

But, to do what? In many cases, to burn down cities, and to kill civilians by the hundreds of thousands--feats of mass destruction and slaughter the like of which the ancient Vandals and Huns could only dream. On the night of 27 July 1943, for example, the Allied bombing of Hamburg caused a firestorm that killed 40,000 people: the raid was code-named "Operation Gomorrah". Read Joerg Friedrich's The Fire: The Bombing of Germany, 1940-45 for more on the horrors of the bomber war from the perspective of the bombed.

Was this justified? It's hard to give a simple answer, but I would have to say that, ultimately, it was. And I think I'm with the majority on this issue.

There is a vocal minority of people who say the strategic-bombing offensive against the Axis was immoral and unjustifiable--but I don't see any evidence of such a minority of opinion in your story, or any reason why such an opinion would arise in response to the Dominion War. And without such evidence, without such a reason, I just couldn't believe what you wrote.

But I think you do your work a disservice when you describe it simply as a response to a monthly challenge. I think your story dealt with some very large and important issues, as all good art must. I wouldn't spend so much time writing posts like this if I thought otherwise.
 
Mistral, thanks for your heartfelt reply.

Camelopard, It seems I have tapped into an exceptional source of reason. I really appreciate you taking the time to share your obviously extensive knowledge with me. It is seems to me that you have spent a great deal of time considering broader aspects of military/political history. Far more time than I have. From your comment on a coleages assignment, I'm guessing teacher or professor?

I freely admit that certain aspects of my story didn't work as well as I would have liked. I succeeded for the most part in making Feller dislikable, but not as you pointed out, belevable. I've actually had more fun with this discourse than I did in writing the story.

Hopefully, I can come up with something not only well written, but well thought out in the future. Although if by making my stories a little off generates more discussion.. I might keep doing them that way.

Thanks again.
 
I think the reporter's attempt to spin the story a certain way in hopes of a "capstone" might be like the approach of an Ann Coulter-an intelligent, well-educated person who writes incredibly idiotic things that are so extremely removed from reality that they generate public attention and notoriety for the author.Controversy SELLS even when its invented.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top