• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Death, sacrifice and happy endings......

Grant

Commodore
Commodore
Over a period ot time I had gained the impression that TOS had a generally flippant superficial attitude on death and loss--mostly from the memory of a few egregious epilogues that stood out in my memory.
Was the series really adverse to downbeat or somber endings?
So I decided to make a list on the subject, starting naturally, with season 1.

WNMHGB---The pilot gets it right. In a particularly devastating episode--12 crew deaths including the likeable Kelso, Dehner and Kirk’s best friend Mitchell.
The epilogue is appropriately somber including the nice touch of Kirk actually sporting bandages indicating that even in the future not all wounds heal immediately--implying that the emotional ones also take time. The only nod to optimism is Kirk’s statement that there is hope for Spock. Great job.

Man Trap---the first regular episode with crew deaths doesn’t dwell too much at the end on the lost crew, but an earlier exchange where the transporter operator when told by Kirk that a crewman was dead on the surface replies, “We’ll bring him home sir.”---is telling of the early trend toward the family loss that they feel when they lose a crewmate.
The epilogue ends with Kirk contemplating the “buffalo”---which is rather touching considering that the “salt-vampire” was a pretty ruthless killer. The idea that they were the instrument of a species extinction bothers Kirk--as it should.

Naked Time---Tomorlen’s death affects the crew but the near loss of the entire ship pushes it into the background. But still, the experience seems to have been taken seriously and Kirk’s “Not those last three days.” shows that it wasn’t a fun time.

Charlie X---although the Thasian’s return Kirk’s crew whole, the crew’s dismay at Charlie’s fate and Kirk’s realization that he can’t solve all the problems he encounter’s is powerful. Pretty daring stuff for 1960s tv.

Balance of Terror---great episode in many ways----the humanizing of the enemy commander, the examination of predudice among the crew, the loss of Tomlinson on his wedding day. All great touches. There is no cheer or joy on winning the battle and Kirk’s brief meeting with the bride to be in the chapel is fantastic. He is the father of his crew and Shatner’s transformation from grief to strong leader after he emerges from the chapel is classic.

What Are Little….---Although they don’t spend much time on the early deaths of the two guards--the ending where the only characters we really met were androids, is very sad. There is no joy in the destruction of Korby, Andrea or even Ruk or Brown. I was always saddened by the fact that Korby has lost his battle of trying to retain his humanity.

Dagger of the Mind---An interesting episode that reflects the universal fear of imprisonment in an institution run by a madman. The only deaths are an unnamed guard and the evil Dr Adams but the writers manage to make the audience even feel a twinge of sadness for the Dr himself when Kirk reflects on the notion of dying of loneliness. To end the episode with Kirk saying, “Not when you’ve sat in that chair.”--is brave.

Conscience of the King---An episode I didn’t give a hoot about when I was a kid has grown into a top ten episode for me. It turns a mass murderer into a character we can understand no matter how much we hate him. A killer who knows the extent of his crimes and can never change them is so much more interesting than a raving lunatic with no conscience. Having the killer turn out to be his daughter trying her best to erase her father’s crimes--rather than the tyrant himself was a great idea. Having Kirk use her and then fall for her is doubly sad. Dr Leighton and the other witness’ dead, Lenore driven mad is truly a sobering ending and once again justice may have been served but there is no joy.

Galileo Seven---All streaks come to an end and TOS’ streak of fine handling of death and sacrifice comes to a screeching halt. Pretty much the equivalent of hitting a brick wall at 100mph. How an episode can have so many fine points--near mutiny by the landing party, the specter of prejudice rearing it’s head again--the loss of 3 crewmembers---Kirk nearly having to leave his crew behind, can end with so pathetic a spectacle of the crew doubled over in laughter, tears rolling down their faces because of Spock not admitting he acted emotionally when “sending out a flare” is mind -boggling. This to my mind is the first time they blatantly placed the main crews popularity ahead of story-telling logic.

Arena---the deaths of the Cestus 3 colonists and the two crewmembers happens so early and so much happens later that it’s easy to accept the epilogue dwelled on the fact that Kirk, once again showed his humanity in not taking the Gorn’s life. It is more than understood that such a man who abstains from killing a reptilian killer is respectful of all life.

Alternative… --- Even a truly crappy episode can show the series’ heart when they decide to end it with Kirk lamenting Lazarus’ fate. “what of Lazarus?” may be the best thing about the episode.

Space Seed--- no one dies, Khan is given a second chance, but the ending is not only sober but actually a little ominous.

This Side of Paradise---So once again no-one dies and everyone actually is healed by the spores of their previous illnesses, but this time they make a comment on the feeling of one of the main cast insightful. No matter how many times I hear Spock say, “for the first time in my life I was happy.”---I am still touched by it.

Devil in the Dark---admittedly a great episode, but after all the good points and outside the 1960s box tv storytelling they gave us---did they really need to end the episode with Spock bragging that the Horta likes Vulcan ears better than any other humanoid feature? Ugh. More pandering to the Spock is cute and lovable notion. I mean 50 miners, 1 Enterprise crewman and thousands of horta babies died and let’s end the episode with them chuckling about Spock’s denying his ego?

Errand of Mercy---thanks to the Organians no one dies, but it was pretty brave for the writers to have the Federation (standing in the for the good old USA) told by a greater power, that they are immature and still haven’t outgrown savagery. Kirk is embarrassed by the fact that he briefly felt anger at being denied the right to go to war by an outsider.

City On the Edge….---The penultimate TOS episode and it ups the ante on death to the highest level. Kirk loses not an honorable enemy or a crewmember, or even a best friend, but a soul-mate. It happens “tv fast’ but it is forgivable and the audience understands that though their time was brief--Kirk and Edith were meant for each other. What a cruel twist of fate for Kirk to first wreck, then be responsible for repairing Earth’s utopian future at the cost of meeting, falling in love with and then having to sacrifice someone like Edith Keeler. If the series had ended right there----it would still have been legendary, provided enough people got to see what they had done in one brief season.
And thank you, thank you, thank you to whoever made the bold decision NOT to end the episode with the Enterprise flying away from the planet accompanied by stirring music---as it does in, what?, 76 other episodes.

Operation…---I can find very little to praise about the season ender. I hate so many things about the episode--the fact that they can’t figure out that light affects the creature that Spock willingly goes blind because the people on the planet won’t have goggles (so f-ing what?), the deaux ex machina “Spock really isn’t blind!” revelation & the fact that the death of Kirk’s brother and sister-in-law has less impact to both the audience and Kirk than any of a dozen other tragedies he has faced so far. Sad way to end season 1.

So any impression I had about TOS being flippant about death and always having happy endings was clearly wrong. Maybe later seasons gave me that impression. Let me think on that
 
Some people gets over certain that's quicker than others it seems. The young bride Angela in Balance of Terror was soon seen with a new guy in Shore Leave.
Also for being Jim Kirk's best friend Gary Mitchell was completely forgotten for not only the rest of the series but the movies and NuTrek. You would think that the character as important to Jim as Gary, would at least get some kind of mention somewhere down the line so far I think his only mention beyond Where No Man Has Gone Before has been in the books and comics.
 
Some people gets over certain that's quicker than others it seems. The young bride Angela in Balance of Terror was soon seen with a new guy in Shore Leave.
Also for being Jim Kirk's best friend Gary Mitchell was completely forgotten for not only the rest of the series but the movies and NuTrek. You would think that the character as important to Jim as Gary, would at least get some kind of mention somewhere down the line so far I think his only mention beyond Where No Man Has Gone Before has been in the books and comics.

Heck, Kirk forgot he lost an actual brother in The Final Frontier! :guffaw:
 
Heck, Kirk forgot he lost an actual brother in The Final Frontier! :guffaw:

Bill, I'm hitting you with a dead fish on that one.


Kirk says I lost a brother, not my brother and he clearly states in Whom Gods Destroy that he considers Mr. Spock his brother and Spock agrees to it.

But I admit I thought of Sam when he first said it......


Over a period ot time I had....

I think the reputation, with the glaring exemption of Galileo Seven, was earned in season 2. The ending of Galileo Seven was egregious, IMO.
 
Last edited:
Some people gets over certain that's quicker than others it seems. The young bride Angela in Balance of Terror was soon seen with a new guy in Shore Leave.
Also for being Jim Kirk's best friend Gary Mitchell was completely forgotten for not only the rest of the series but the movies and NuTrek. You would think that the character as important to Jim as Gary, would at least get some kind of mention somewhere down the line so far I think his only mention beyond Where No Man Has Gone Before has been in the books and comics.

He never mentioned Gary again, but in this exchange from "By Any Other Name"--

KIRK: What happened to your ship?
ROJAN: There is an energy barrier at the rim of your galaxy.
KIRK
: Yes, I know. We've been there.
Kirk sort of blurted it out, with his expression momentarily thoughtful. I believe the scene was directed that way since it was a clear continuity moment, which Kirk did not care to recall. If so, the entire Mitchell matter would be the cause, so you could say that in an indirect way, he mentioned Gary again.
 
The chuckling on the bridge is reputed to be the result of Gene Coon's general lightening of tone. I prefer somber; ymmv. Does S3 lose that end-chuckle-with-cute-music vibe under Fed Frei and his (and GR's) rejection of comedic Trek?
 
Heck, Kirk forgot he lost an actual brother in The Final Frontier! :guffaw:

Bill, I'm hitting you with a dead fish on that one.


Kirk says I lost a brother, not my brother and he clearly states in Whom Gods Destroy that he considers Mr. Spock his brother and Spock agrees to it.

But I admit I thought of Sam when he first said it......


Over a period ot time I had....

I think the reputation, with the glaring exemption of Galileo Seven, was earned in season 2. The ending of Galileo Seven was egregious, IMO.

Bingo on the Trek V quote. It's not meant to exclude Kirk's biological brother. It's simply meant to re-emphasize the closeness between Kirk and Spock. I loved that line and that last scene.
 
Huh, interesting. That is actually one of the big issues I have with TOS, the random redhsirt deaths nobody seems to care about because they are not part of Kirk's bridge clique followed by the "everybody laughs" ending.
Nice to see that, at least initially, it wasn't as common as popular memory has it (though still present and just as upsetting as you point out)

I still don't agree that Edith Keeler stood out that much among Kirk's love interests, but this list has made me think about giving TOS another chance.
I hope you continue that analysis into the other two seasons, I'd definitely be interested.
 
The prime offender is probably "The Apple," in which at least four redshirts get brutally killed, but ends with Kirk smirking about the fact that the Oompa-Loompas are finally free to learn about the birds and the bees . . . .

By contrast, "Catspaw," for all flack it sometimes gets, ends with Kirk grimly recalling the redshirt who died in the pre-credits teaser: "No illusion. Jackson is dead."
 
I'll second "Catspaw" here. Shatner delivers an appropriately somber line reading of "Jackson is dead." "Alternative Factor" also deserves a mention. "What of Lazarus?" is one of my favorite lines in the first season, even coming from a rough episode.

I'll point out one thing about "Operation: Annihilate!"; and that is prior to the hammy Spock double eyelid thing, the episode does treat its subject with a fair amount of gravity. From Kirk's initial frustration in the teaser, "That's my brother, was my brother.", the continuing debate about the possibility of having to kill every living thing on the planet plus Spock and Kirk's nephew, all the way through Kirk's anger at Spock being blinded needlessly (even though I always thought some of his anger at Bones was unjustified, Kirk practically dares McCoy to do the experiment without safety measures). Even just prior to the Spock isn't blind reveal, Kirk's plaintative "Bones, Bones" over the intercom is very well executed. It's just the blindness bait and switch that kind of undoes the episode.
 
But I admit I thought of Sam when he first said it.

As did I. And for two seconds it was a great moment. But then it was whisked away as a facile bit of rhetoric.

I think the screenwriter on ST5 simply wasn't a fan, and didn't make up for it by doing his homework. True, this was before the Internet made it easy, but he could have simply read Kirk's entry in The Star Trek Concordance (1976).

The classic-cast movies in general were made with a fast-and-loose attitude toward continuity, and ST5 is among the worst examples.
 
On the other hand, I was watching "Day of the Dove" the other day and was startled when the redshirt who beams down to the planet in the opening scene actually survived the Klingon ambush. I had him pegged as a goner for sure.

But he actually lives through the entire episode!
 
On the other hand, I was watching "Day of the Dove" the other day and was startled when the redshirt who beams down to the planet in the opening scene actually survived the Klingon ambush. I had him pegged as a goner for sure.

But he actually lives through the entire episode!

Imagine how horrific his eventual off screen death must have been! :lol:
 
I never had an issue with the laugh lines at the ends of episodes. I didn't always find them funny, but they didn't seem inappropriate for TV of that era.

If I had to justify Kirk's attitude from an in-universe perspective, I'd say that he was the type of guy to look at the half-full portion of the glass. Given the extreme dangers that he and his crew were facing...on more than one occasion, they were following up on a mission that had already taken the lives of an entire starship crew...he was warping away from some of those missions not thinking of himself as having lost 2 crewmen, but having saved 428.
 
I never had an issue with the laugh lines at the ends of episodes. I didn't always find them funny, but they didn't seem inappropriate for TV of that era.

If I had to justify Kirk's attitude from an in-universe perspective, I'd say that he was the type of guy to look at the half-full portion of the glass. Given the extreme dangers that he and his crew were facing...on more than one occasion, they were following up on a mission that had already taken the lives of an entire starship crew...he was warping away from some of those missions not thinking of himself as having lost 2 crewmen, but having saved 428.

That's true.

I really only find fault* with 3 particular episodes in this regard: Galileo Seven, Changeling, and Apple.


Those are also 2 of my least favorite episodes of any season in that list, I think that counts toward my disatisfaction greatly.

*Fault as in I think it's bad.
There's other times where I really would prefer something but still not find fault with what's there.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top