Leave it to Trek fans to hate their own movie.
The reboot was a huge hit. Virtually everyone I know says as far as they're concerned it made even the good Star Wars movies look bad.
The sequel has a good chance of holding its own against the Hobbit and Superman. With a good week or two between releases, it'll have plenty of time to dominate and rake in the bucks. Whether it beats The Hobbit or not (and it has a serious chance), as long as they deliver a good part deux people will see it in droves.
I actually think poor Superman is probably going to be the loser. Zack Snyder hasn't exactly impressed people with his last few movies. I kind of doubt a crash course in superhero film making from Chris Nolan is going to help much.
Virtually everyone I know says as far as they're concerned it made even the good Star Wars movies look bad.
Virtually everyone I know says as far as they're concerned it made even the good Star Wars movies look bad.
I've never heard such a thing.
^^^
At this point, I'd be happy with any official news at Comic-con. It's like they've totally forgotten about it.
Didn't the priciples sign on to do three movies? If that is the case, why has it taken this long to review the Original Series for ideas, to try and find an idea for this script?
Which, as any professional would tell you, would have been one of the worst things you could do. Why would you write the sequel to something you haven't been committed to (and before you say it, they weren't put on retention until shortly BEFORE the film came out) or don't even know is going to be made when you can work on projects that ARE guaranteed?I would've started on it the day the Original Script for the 2009 movie was complete.
Who said he was?And why is JJ dragging his feet? It's been a month since his last project was released.
link said:Well Paramount has made official what we all knew was coming. The Star Trek sequel has been officially delayed and will not be released on June 29, 2012. Paramount has now put their second G.I. Joe film into that slot, but they have not yet picked the date for the Star Trek sequel.
link said:Paramount has yet to pick a new release date for the Star Trek sequel which should start shooting in January 2012. TrekMovie sources indicate that a decision has not been made and that it is in the hands of Paramount. The Star Trek team are ready for either of the choices on the table: holiday 2012 or summer 2013. A decision and announcement on that and on JJ Abrams directing should come in August.
No, it's just officially no longer going to be 29 June 2012. The new date has not yet been set.So it is officially coming out November of 2012? I love it! It will be an early B-Day present!
On AICN they're speculating it will be pushed back to summer of 2013.
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/50594
Can I just say WTF? Who the hell's going to wait four years between Star Trek movies?
Everyone who wants to watch the movie?Can I just say WTF? Who the hell's going to wait four years between Star Trek movies?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.