FWIW, Mick didn't really fit in. He was too unstable. If they killed off Hawkman after the second episode, no one is really safe.
What about Banner?In Marvel, most of the movie heroes are quite frequently killers, and the supposedly "darker" Daredevil and Jessica Jones are the only MCU heroes other than Ant-Man who've ever expressed the slightest reluctance to kill their opponents.
You mean like in the first movie where he showed he had good control over being able to switch back and forth, and then proceeded to do exactly that, with the very first action him doing was killing something?It's not after the fact if he proactively doesn't even want to be the Hulk.
For that matter, I'm not convinced that the ice patch was so ineffective. Sure, ice exposed to vacuum might sublimate away eventually, but we've seen Snart's cold gun create massive quantities of ice in seconds -- enough to encase the Flash's entire body, for instance. Surely he could've created a patch that would've been airtight long enough for Gideon to let them out of the room.
But that's exactly my problem. The issue isn't that it's never been done before, the issue is that it's done too damn often and too damn casually. In the comics, superheroes usually have codes against killing. The Green Arrow and his team have nominally, theoretically renounced killing (though sometimes it sure seems like they're using deadly force), and the Flash generally tends to avoid it except in extreme circumstances. And Supergirl, refreshingly, has been quite emphatic about her unwillingness to kill, and Superman's as well. But too many screen superheroes kill casually and routinely, and it's the one major thing about the comics that even the best screen adaptations still tend to get wrong. The current movie Superman has been defined by the moment when he killed his enemy. In Marvel, most of the movie heroes are quite frequently killers, and the supposedly "darker" Daredevil and Jessica Jones are the only MCU heroes other than Ant-Man who've ever expressed the slightest reluctance to kill their opponents. (Well, the Agents of SHIELD generally use nonlethal guns, but we've also seen Coulson and his team spending much of the season actively trying to assassinate Grant Ward.)
Well, if by "will have lived in the Future" you mean "will actually grow older and might one day visit his distant future a few times," sure. But even if he did travel into the future at which point he decided to invent an AI, it's still absurd to think that he -- a forensic scientist -- would be more intelligent, skilled, and proficient at AI design than the teams of computer and software engineers from that same future with entire lifetimes of experience and specialized knowledge and familiarity with the technology.Barry will have had lived in the Future, and will have had worked in the future, which is most likely when he invented this AI technology, around about the same time Barry pissed off Eobard into becoming a big bad and starting a time war.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.