• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DC Star Trek Comic Series.

That is one thing that always weighed against the IDW TPB reprints (and this goes for their Doctor Who Classics volumes) -- the lack of any kind of framing material, like an intro are articles about the history, etc.

Totally agree. I probably wouldn't have bought any of the early trade reprints from DC - except for the cool, newly-added forewords by Star Trek actors and/or writers, which put that particular selection into an historical context.

Now I get all the trade reprints out of a need to be a completist.
 
Right now I just wanna find a good read.....

Well, DC Comics didn't make a habit of reprinting everything into its trade collections, just the popular arcs and some "best of..." stories, so if any DC trades come up in your searches, take the plunge.

http://homepage.mac.com/mmtz/stcomix/dc1tostpb.html

http://homepage.mac.com/mmtz/stcomix/dc2tostpb.html

Also wanting to get the Next Generation Comic Book series.

http://homepage.mac.com/mmtz/stcomix/dc2tngtpb.html

http://homepage.mac.com/mmtz/stcomix/titandsntng.html
 
Last edited:
Now I get all the trade reprints out of a need to be a completist.

I did that at first, but when I realized IDW was selling me comics I'd bought three or four times already, I decided that was way beyond being a completist and well into "there's one born every minute" territory.
 
Now I get all the trade reprints out of a need to be a completist.

I did that at first, but when I realized IDW was selling me comics I'd bought three or four times already, I decided that was way beyond being a completist and well into "there's one born every minute" territory.

Yes, they are doing that with this upcoming TOS omnibus, which looks like it's a reprint of recent TPBs...

but I may get it, as I like the smaller format of the omnibuses...
 
I don't really care why they released a bunch of dodgy TPBs -- and I don't think it can be argued that they weren't inferior -- I think the release of all those "Best Of This 'n' That" volumes damaged IDW's reputation and probably sold very poorly.
Also not helping IDW's reputation on the reprints are the creators of the reprinted work speaking out online against the omnibus volumes because IDW isn't paying royalties or sending comp copies. Former IDW editor Andrew Steven Harris has said that IDW is under no obligation to pay the creators royalties, but there is clearly a belief on the part of the creators that they should have seen something which suggests that IDW is not honoring DC's contracts which, legally, they may not have to do.

My LCS started out ordering 2 or 3 copies of each title, but when it became clear I was the ONLY one buying them (because I'm a sad completist) they quickly reduced their order to a single copy for my hold.
IDW announced a few more omnibuses, and then canceled them. It looks like the next on the schedule is a reprint of IDW-created material.

Interestingly, the latest Edward R. Hamilton catalog I received has most of the IDW Star Trek and Transformers trades and omnibuses for five or six dollars apiece, which suggests that they're selling poorly in the book market as they're now reaching the remainder supply chain.

That is one thing that always weighed against the IDW TPB reprints (and this goes for their Doctor Who Classics volumes) -- the lack of any kind of framing material, like an intro are articles about the history, etc.
I contacted IDW editor Denton Tipton recently about the possibility of writing an intro to a volume of Doctor Who Classics (Voyager could use an intro extolling the brilliance of Steve Parkhouse, who is, in my opinion, one of Doctor Who's greatest writers, and also the most unheralded), but I suspect he circular filed my missive. His loss.
 
Why not? Dark Horse Comics released gorgeous collections of Marvel Comics old Star Wars comics from the 70s and 80s. They were printed on glossy paper and recolored to meet current standards.
Really? I might have bought them if I knew about the re-coloring.
Buy 'em. They've been out for like eight years now and they are absolutely gorgeous. :)
For what it's worth, Dark Horse is about to recollect these in their Omnibus series. Smaller dimensions, but more per volume, and this reprint will include the side comics (such as the Return of the Jedi adaptation) that weren't included in the original run.

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Omnibus:_A_Long_Time_Ago..._Volume_1
 
A little OT, and I apologize, but have Peter David's later New Frontier novels ever given us a hint as to the final fates of Bearclaw, Nancy, Konom and the rest? I'm in one of those "wait a minute, it's been 100 years, what happened?" moods.

(rest = midget albino retarded Klingon whose name escapes me)
 
A little OT, and I apologize, but have Peter David's later New Frontier novels ever given us a hint as to the final fates of Bearclaw, Nancy, Konom and the rest? I'm in one of those "wait a minute, it's been 100 years, what happened?" moods.

(rest = midget albino retarded Klingon whose name escapes me)
Midget Albino Klingon Bernie appears as Kobry in Strike Zone.

The rest haven't been used, though about five years ago I was working on an SCE outline that featured Nancy Bryce and Liz Sherwood and fit inside the movie-era comics continuity. It involved Starfleet's biggest damn towing job. Sadly, it grew out of hand; the last pass topped forty pages of 10pt. Arial. (Yes, the outline for a novella was novella-length itself. Go figure.)
 
^Thanks. Time to bump Strike Zone up my reading list.

Yep. "Kobry" (the former Moron, aka Bernie) comes from the names of Konom and Bryce, of course.

"Strike Zone" is a standalone novel but, for those in the know, it continues the "Who Killed Captain Kirk?" meta arc from Peter David's TOS Series I comics for DC. Essentially it answers "Who are the Cognoscenti?", which PAD was unable to continue due to the big license renewals of 1989.

A relative of Liz Sherwood's is fleetingly referenced in Mike Barr's "Gemini".
 
I loved the beginning of the "Who Killed Captain Kirk" story. I really thought Bearclaw had finally snapped when he walked in, stabbed Kirk in thr chest and told him to "Go to hell!". I thought it was brilliant. I was actually disappointed when it turned out it wasn't him.
 
I loved the beginning of the "Who Killed Captain Kirk" story. I really thought Bearclaw had finally snapped when he walked in, stabbed Kirk in thr chest and told him to "Go to hell!". I thought it was brilliant. I was actually disappointed when it turned out it wasn't him.

Poor ol' Bearclaw. I loved the issue where he found himself bonding with Commander Thimon, an elderly Andorian about to retire from Starfleet.

I remember PAD dropping hints that Arex and M'Ress would end up meeting Bearclaw again in a "New Frontier" novel, but it turned out to be a bearclaw donut in the rec room.
 
Poor ol' Bearclaw. I loved the issue where he found himself bonding with Commander Thimon, an elderly Andorian about to retire from Starfleet.

That was a good one -- except I'll never understand where Tony Isabella got the idea that Andorians' head covering was feathers instead of hair.
 
That was a good one -- except I'll never understand where Tony Isabella got the idea that Andorians' head covering was feathers instead of hair.

Yeah, I'm kinda remembering a reference somewhere to Andorians' "feathery white hair" and he seemingly latched onto that description and suddenly each new Andorian in the comic had hair like the avian Hawk from "Buck Rogers". :eek: Maybe it was a popular Andorian style cut, like Shar's dreadlocks?

4000010785_2ffa859659_o.jpg


Mind you, Lieutenant Arex ended up with three eyes in one "Star Trek Logs" text adaptation, and "feathered shoulders" in another. Weird things happen.
 
Last edited:
^Err, I was referring to Tony Isabella, the writer. I could understand it if it were just an art mistake, since a lot of the art in those comics was inaccurate or interpretive, but I'm pretty sure the feathers were mentioned in dialogue too.

Although your comment does suggest an answer -- maybe the writer got the idea from what Tom Sutton was already doing with the art.
 
I'm pretty sure the feathers were mentioned in dialogue too.

Not that I recall. Unless he (or some other writer) used the expression in the "Andorians" section of "Who's Who in Star Trek" Volume 1?

Mmmm, or did Bearclaw make mention of his attitude ruffling Thimon's feathers?
 
William Bearclaw. Ahhhh. One of my favorite non-canon Trek characters. I was sad when Star Trek v2 omitted Bearclaw from the storyline. He was so damn interesting. An angry, bigoted Starfleet officer with tons of talent that was being squashed by his bad attitude. So much more interesting than Voyager's Chakotay who was surprisingly vanilla for a Native American Maquis placed in charge of Federation officers.

Why has no one utilized Bearclaw since 89? I know Dick Arnold put a ban on reusing non-canon characters but that dude was flushed down the shitcan years ago. To hell with Janeway! Bring back Bearclaw! :D :D :D
 
Why has no one utilized Bearclaw since 89? I know Dick Arnold put a ban on reusing non-canon characters but that dude was flushed down the shitcan years ago.

Peter David kinda re-evolved him into Quintin Stone (TNG's "A Rock and a Hard Place"), who then morphed into Captain Calhoun ("New Frontier").
 
Really? I don't see any similarity between Bearclaw and Stone/Calhoun. I certainly do see the resemblance between Stone and Calhoun though since they're both Mel Gibson.
 
Last edited:
But he's not "the" Bearclaw. We need to find out what happened to him.

Somthing other than he ended up running a donut empire!

Heck, with 150-something Admiral Archer, canon human life expectancy just spiked. Bring him back and ger him into a fist fight with Akaar.

And then one with Admiral Robau!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top