Screentests for "Superman:Legacy" being done right now for Superman and Lois.
Expect a quick announcement to distract attention away from The Flash.
Screentests for "Superman:Legacy" being done right now for Superman and Lois.
I'm not necessarily going for the overly cheesy 50s/60s version, but I absolutely 100% trying to steer it away from the "original intent for the character" because the character has changed and evolved a lot since 1938, and people are going to go into a new, modern adaptation expecting to see a modern version of the character, not one that stopped being relevant almost a century ago.
Didn't they even draw Superman to look like Christopher Reeve n the comics for a while?
Gary Frank very much did:Didn't they even draw Superman to look like Christopher Reeve n the comics for a while?
Screentests for "Superman:Legacy" being done right now for Superman and Lois
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670150846019936257
• Nicholas Hoult, David Corenswet & Tom Brittney for Superman
• Emma Mackey, Phoebe Dynevor & Rachel Brosnahan for Lois Lane
It seems like the big favorite is Corenswet and Mackey.
The movie's been out less than 24 hours. It's a bit premature to call it a failure.
All I meant was that they knew going in that this was not going to be a finite series that only last 3, or 12, or however many issues
All I meant is that people tend to have a particular idea of what a character is like, mostly built off of whatever version of the character they have seen the most, whether it's in the recent comics, or other adaptations.
and people are going to go into a new, modern adaptation expecting to see a modern version of the character, not one that stopped being relevant almost a century ago.
"...All this has been written before and will be written again..."Andy Muschietti to direct the non-Patterson Batman movie. Gunn's new era is looking a lot like the old one.
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/...i-directing-batman-film-the-flash-1235646262/
"...All this has been written before and will be written again..."![]()
Aquaman was the DCEU's one billion dollar plus worldwide box office success.Aquaman, probably.
Of course, now I fully expect him to leave due to "scheduling conflicts" or some other excuse once we're a few months down the line.
It's still too early to claim that.
Not according to what I've seen.
And reviews are meaningless anyway.
I'm not saying that it won't end up failing in the end (and WBD will only have itself to blame if it does); I'm saying that it's too early to claim that it has in fact failed.
Everything is down hill after the first 3 days in terms of profit making
Yeah, I actually agree with you here, call the movie a failure when it hasn't even been out for a full weekend is incredibly premature.By now, you know there's a part of the movie-going audience itching to condemn any DCEU release. The series is dead and buried in any case (despite the forthcoming Aquaman sequel), so at this point, jumping on the "its a failure" train means nothing to a series with no future.
But I'm assuming when they were creating the character, they started right off planning for it to last more than one issue, and no matter how long the series lasted, they had to no that the character was not going to stay exactly the same the entire time.Again, where are you getting that from? Evidence? Moreover, your:
"Any writer who creates a character for an ongoing series is going go in aware that the character is going to change and grow as the series goes on."
Creativity does not work that way. You assumed creators knew their project was going to be an ongoing series, when 1930s the barely-born superhero comic sub-genre had no such business structure to base such a hope on. They were lucky a single issue made it to print, a bit luckier if it made it to three or four issues, so the idea--your idea--that the creators knew the character would be an ongoing series, therefore (as you projected earlier) forecast unknowable changes over the course of time by innumerable people in various forms of media is historically false...in the extreme, all to push your I-hate-non-Santa-Daddy-Superman narrative.
I'm not talking about that exact version, just one that is closer to what people are used to seeing in the comics and other adaptations.No, I am not, I'm basing what I'm off of seeing the responses to things like Man of Steel, Supermand & Lois, and the different comic book series that have come out.Again, you hypocritically steer that idea toward what you want...despite it being several generations old...like the Salkind version, yet the audiences--the fans you believe existed with a particular idea about a character / allegedly seen the most--wholly rejected Singer's on-bended-knee tribute to all things Salkind in the form of Superman Returns. The Salkind-ites got exactly what they wanted...but movie goers were not and are still not desiring that kind of Superman.
[/QUOOTE]...or one from a cartoon which made its debut 50 years ago, or a movie released 45 years ago. The Super Friends and the Salkind's interpretations stopped being relevant in the century of their creation. Singer did not understand that (or care to), and the poor reception was his lesson / reward, one shared by the Santa-Daddy Superman advocates.
We finally began watching the latest season of Marvellous Mrs Maisel last night and I was thinking that I’d love to see Rachel Brosnahan as Lois in a retro Superman movie. She’d be great in a modern one too, of course, but would love to see her in one with screwball comedy type dialogue in the newsroom.
But I'm assuming when they were creating the character, they started right off planning for it to last more than one issue, and no matter how long the series lasted, they had to no that the character was not going to stay exactly the same the entire time.
I’d love to see one in the 1930s-1950s. I know it won’t happen but doesn’t mean I can’t imagine it.A retro Superman movie?
Sunday AM Writethru , after Saturday AM post…refresh for updates There are a lot of lessons to be learned this weekend. But chief among them is what it’s like for a major motion picture studio to open a movie with largely a number of its cast, primarily its main star, not available to do press.
That was the big looming question which was on everyone’s minds in the wake of Ezra Miller’s tabloid laden 2020-2022 in regards to Warner Bros. DC’s $200M The Flash, and now we have our answer as the pic is opening to $55.1M over 3-days and $64M for the 4-day Juneteenth holiday weekend at 4,234 theaters, below Warner’s $70M-$75M 3-day expectations. 3-day projections just kept losing speed for this Andy Muschietti-directed movie...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.