• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DC Movies - To Infinity and Beyond

I'm not necessarily going for the overly cheesy 50s/60s version, but I absolutely 100% trying to steer it away from the "original intent for the character" because the character has changed and evolved a lot since 1938, and people are going to go into a new, modern adaptation expecting to see a modern version of the character, not one that stopped being relevant almost a century ago.

I think most people today would base their template for Superman more on Christopher Reeve than on the 1938-9 comics. Even the comics from the '80s onward have been heavily influenced by the Donner movies. Certainly the usual modern version of Lois, a prizewinning superstar reporter by the time Clark first shows up, began with Margot Kidder; in the older comics, Lois was the "girl reporter" who had to fight to be taken seriously and kept getting upstaged by Clark because he cheated to scoop her on Superman stories. Also the modern portrayal of Jimmy Olsen as a photographer instead of a cub reporter began with the movies. Throw in the constant reuse of the movies' crystalline design for Kryptonian tech and architecture, and that version of Superman has really had an outsized influence on later portrayals.
 
Didn't they even draw Superman to look like Christopher Reeve n the comics for a while?

Not exactly. John Byrne's 1986 redesigns were inspired by Reeve and Kidder, but Byrne doesn't really do actor likenesses, so they were more just a similar type.
 
Didn't they even draw Superman to look like Christopher Reeve n the comics for a while?
Gary Frank very much did:

sw2kadjrtb151.jpg


D94AKg-VUAEh6cW.jpg


tumblr_lq44g3EP7j1qfxwtoo1_1280.jpg
 
Last edited:
Screentests for "Superman:Legacy" being done right now for Superman and Lois

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670150846019936257


• Nicholas Hoult, David Corenswet & Tom Brittney for Superman

• Emma Mackey, Phoebe Dynevor & Rachel Brosnahan for Lois Lane


It seems like the big favorite is Corenswet and Mackey.

We finally began watching the latest season of Marvellous Mrs Maisel last night and I was thinking that I’d love to see Rachel Brosnahan as Lois in a retro Superman movie. She’d be great in a modern one too, of course, but would love to see her in one with screwball comedy type dialogue in the newsroom.
 
The movie's been out less than 24 hours. It's a bit premature to call it a failure.

By now, you know there's a part of the movie-going audience itching to condemn any DCEU release. The series is dead and buried in any case (despite the forthcoming Aquaman sequel), so at this point, jumping on the "its a failure" train means nothing to a series with no future.

All I meant was that they knew going in that this was not going to be a finite series that only last 3, or 12, or however many issues

Again, where are you getting that from? Evidence? Moreover, your:

"Any writer who creates a character for an ongoing series is going go in aware that the character is going to change and grow as the series goes on."

Creativity does not work that way. You assumed creators knew their project was going to be an ongoing series, when 1930s the barely-born superhero comic sub-genre had no such business structure to base such a hope on. They were lucky a single issue made it to print, a bit luckier if it made it to three or four issues, so the idea--your idea--that the creators knew the character would be an ongoing series, therefore (as you projected earlier) forecast unknowable changes over the course of time by innumerable people in various forms of media is historically false...in the extreme, all to push your I-hate-non-Santa-Daddy-Superman narrative.

All I meant is that people tend to have a particular idea of what a character is like, mostly built off of whatever version of the character they have seen the most, whether it's in the recent comics, or other adaptations.

Again, you hypocritically steer that idea toward what you want...despite it being several generations old...like the Salkind version, yet the audiences--the fans you believe existed with a particular idea about a character / allegedly seen the most--wholly rejected Singer's on-bended-knee tribute to all things Salkind in the form of Superman Returns. The Salkind-ites got exactly what they wanted...but movie goers were not and are still not desiring that kind of Superman.


and people are going to go into a new, modern adaptation expecting to see a modern version of the character, not one that stopped being relevant almost a century ago.

...or one from a cartoon which made its debut 50 years ago, or a movie released 45 years ago. The Super Friends and the Salkind's interpretations stopped being relevant in the century of their creation. Singer did not understand that (or care to), and the poor reception was his lesson / reward, one shared by the Santa-Daddy Superman advocates.
 
Last edited:
Aquaman, probably.
Aquaman was the DCEU's one billion dollar plus worldwide box office success.

The first DCEU Wonder Woman and Batman versus Superman both made $800 million plus in the worldwide box office;: and the WB execs were still disappointed with Batman versus Superman's performance because hey, these were the two most popular DC Comics heroes...*

*- plus the first DCEU appearance of Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman. The latter is probably the only reason it made $800 million plus because most people loved her scenes in the film.

And currently while The Flash isn't cratering at the box office as bad as Shazam Fury of the Gods, it's probably going to be lower (projected domestic opening weekend of 60 million), then the opening weekend Box Office performance of Black Adam which made 68 million domestically on its opening weekend.
 
Of course, now I fully expect him to leave due to "scheduling conflicts" or some other excuse once we're a few months down the line.

Maybe not. I saw it pointed out on Twitter that Muschietti was probably picked for TB&TB because he was the only director who was enough of a team player to get The Flash actually finished in spite of all the executive micromanaging, to stick with it when everyone before him had walked away from the film. https://twitter.com/Darren_Mooney/status/1670029096724623364
 
It's still too early to claim that.



Not according to what I've seen.

And reviews are meaningless anyway.

I'm not saying that it won't end up failing in the end (and WBD will only have itself to blame if it does); I'm saying that it's too early to claim that it has in fact failed.


We live in a very social media/quick quick/ short attention span world. If the movie didn't blow the doors off right out of the gate then it has a very low chance of picking up the momentum it lost.

Everything is down hill after the first 3 days in terms of profit making
 
By now, you know there's a part of the movie-going audience itching to condemn any DCEU release. The series is dead and buried in any case (despite the forthcoming Aquaman sequel), so at this point, jumping on the "its a failure" train means nothing to a series with no future.
Yeah, I actually agree with you here, call the movie a failure when it hasn't even been out for a full weekend is incredibly premature.
Again, where are you getting that from? Evidence? Moreover, your:

"Any writer who creates a character for an ongoing series is going go in aware that the character is going to change and grow as the series goes on."

Creativity does not work that way. You assumed creators knew their project was going to be an ongoing series, when 1930s the barely-born superhero comic sub-genre had no such business structure to base such a hope on. They were lucky a single issue made it to print, a bit luckier if it made it to three or four issues, so the idea--your idea--that the creators knew the character would be an ongoing series, therefore (as you projected earlier) forecast unknowable changes over the course of time by innumerable people in various forms of media is historically false...in the extreme, all to push your I-hate-non-Santa-Daddy-Superman narrative.
But I'm assuming when they were creating the character, they started right off planning for it to last more than one issue, and no matter how long the series lasted, they had to no that the character was not going to stay exactly the same the entire time.
Again, you hypocritically steer that idea toward what you want...despite it being several generations old...like the Salkind version, yet the audiences--the fans you believe existed with a particular idea about a character / allegedly seen the most--wholly rejected Singer's on-bended-knee tribute to all things Salkind in the form of Superman Returns. The Salkind-ites got exactly what they wanted...but movie goers were not and are still not desiring that kind of Superman.
No, I am not, I'm basing what I'm off of seeing the responses to things like Man of Steel, Supermand & Lois, and the different comic book series that have come out.


[/QUOOTE]...or one from a cartoon which made its debut 50 years ago, or a movie released 45 years ago. The Super Friends and the Salkind's interpretations stopped being relevant in the century of their creation. Singer did not understand that (or care to), and the poor reception was his lesson / reward, one shared by the Santa-Daddy Superman advocates.
I'm not talking about that exact version, just one that is closer to what people are used to seeing in the comics and other adaptations.
 
We finally began watching the latest season of Marvellous Mrs Maisel last night and I was thinking that I’d love to see Rachel Brosnahan as Lois in a retro Superman movie. She’d be great in a modern one too, of course, but would love to see her in one with screwball comedy type dialogue in the newsroom.

A retro Superman movie?
 
But I'm assuming when they were creating the character, they started right off planning for it to last more than one issue, and no matter how long the series lasted, they had to no that the character was not going to stay exactly the same the entire time.

Yep. Only someone with no creative experience would expect a creation to remain permanently unchanged from its earliest conception. You want to learn from experience and find ways to make your work better over time. The people who assume they have it perfect from the get-go are the people who will never sell their work because they don't know how to listen to criticism and learn to do better.
 
Ouch. $13 million less than Black Adam made on its opening weekend if these projections hold:

Deadline: The Flash’ Falls Down With $55M 3-Day Opening: Here’s Why
https://deadline.com/2023/06/box-office-the-flash-bomb-elemental-1235419478/
Sunday AM Writethru , after Saturday AM post…refresh for updates There are a lot of lessons to be learned this weekend. But chief among them is what it’s like for a major motion picture studio to open a movie with largely a number of its cast, primarily its main star, not available to do press.

That was the big looming question which was on everyone’s minds in the wake of Ezra Miller’s tabloid laden 2020-2022 in regards to Warner Bros. DC’s $200M The Flash, and now we have our answer as the pic is opening to $55.1M over 3-days and $64M for the 4-day Juneteenth holiday weekend at 4,234 theaters, below Warner’s $70M-$75M 3-day expectations. 3-day projections just kept losing speed for this Andy Muschietti-directed movie...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top