Anyhoo - Here's Rachel Brosnahan doing Joan Rivers jokes.
Go to YouTube and type in 'Superman 1978 Reactions' and get back to me on that.Millennials have no attachment to the Reeve films and neither does GenZ and that’s assuming they even know the film even exists.
Go to YouTube and type in 'Superman 1978 Reactions' and get back to me on that.
Get back to you on what? There are more people in my apartment building than there are reaction videos for that on YouTube ffs.
Revisiting the trailer - I think it was a bold choice to show Lois and Clark as people who would defraud their employer and the people via a faked interview.
so very traditional in that sense.
;-)
Get back to you on what? There are more people in my apartment building than there are reaction videos for that on YouTube ffs. That you’re suggesting that’s even remotely a measuring stick of anything in a nation of 340 MILLION people is just strange.
OK, I'm cool with it, and I don't understand why so many people have a problem with it. It's become a regular thing for the new versions of classic characters to include callbacks to earlier versions. For me this is no different from Linda Carter in WW'84, or all of the returning Flash actors in the CW series.Pretty sure Gunn has made it clear the Williams theme is used in the actual film. Which, tedious and repetitive handwringing aside, is the best possible decision on that front.
This isn't entirey true since Batman/Robin is pretty clearly influenced by '66 TV series.Agreed.
You can bet that's never going to happen, since every live action Batman film--from Burton/Schumacher to Nolan to Snyder to Reeves--were never going to use that TV theme to color the films, or suggest any association with the Dozier series.
It's really not at all, trailers are constantly using music and things like that that aren't in the final movie.If the Williams music is only used in the trailer, then its misleading. That said, some comments here indicated the Williams music is used in the new film.
Yes to the former, no to the latter. He has played it coy about the specifics of that.I thought James Gunn confirmed that Lois and Clark were already dating when the movie starts and that she knew Clark was Superman?
Clark lives there. Superman (when he IS Superman) is not using Clark Kent's identity documents.Oh, OK. I just figured since he mostly operates in Metropolis that it would be pretty much common knowledge that he lived there.
It's not a movie about modern opsec. It's about a guy from another planet who's arch enemy is a mad scientist. Luthor can waltz into just about any building on or off Earth because he's wicked smart.Is it me or do Hollywood writers not have any clue how modern opsec actually works?
A modern mid level corporate office has better security than Kryptonian tech Fortress of Solitude.
Anybody can just walk in inside Superman's top secret high tech hideout.
Is it me or do Hollywood writers not have any clue how modern opsec actually works?
A modern mid level corporate office has better security than Kryptonian tech Fortress of Solitude.
Anybody can just walk in inside Superman's top secret high tech hideout.
Luthor could be wicked smart but Superman's brain alone would be on the millionth level IQ, imagine the brain power needed to not juts navogate during flight but to process superspeed.It's not a movie about modern opsec. It's about a guy from another planet who's arch enemy is a mad scientist. Luthor can waltz into just about any building on or off Earth because he's wicked smart.
They are already inside, that means the Fortress security is breachable, and that shouldn't be.If you're talking about the Donner films or Superman Returns, maybe. But the trailer for this film hasn't shown us enough of its Fortress sequence to allow drawing any conclusions about how Luthor manages to get in.
You also seem to have missed the fact that Luthor and the Engineer are battling the Fortress's security robots and Krypto. Clearly they were not allowed to simply walk in.
Clearly you don't know Luthor who has matched wits and intellect with Superman and people smarter than Superman. Luthor's whole thing is being supersmart. It's his "superpower." Superman not so much. There are versions were he is, but not much in recent years.Luthor could be wicked smart but Superman's brain alone would be on the millionth level IQ, imagine the brain power needed to not juts navogate during flight but to process superspeed.
Breaking in into the Fortress should be nigh impossible for any human, even Luthor.
Though Superman & Lois did imply that Kryptonians on Earth have some advanced mental attributes. Superman tells Lois in the first season’s interview scene that he has learned all of Earth’s languages. And both he and Tal-Rho were able to marshal the mental discipline to communicate in the backwards English of the inverse world, something humans couldn’t do.Clearly you don't know Luthor who has matched wits and intellect with Superman and people smarter than Superman. Luthor's whole thing is being supersmart. It's his "superpower." Superman not so much. There are versions were he is, but not much in recent years.
Why? This is a movie. It needs conflict and a sense of peril and hero who's not gonna win every battle, I suppose there are people who just want two hours of Superman "winning" , but I cant imagine it being successful and entertaining.They are already inside, that means the Fortress security is breachable, and that shouldn't
And he has the Engineer with him.It's not a movie about modern opsec. It's about a guy from another planet who's arch enemy is a mad scientist. Luthor can waltz into just about any building on or off Earth because he's wicked smart.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.