I thought this was going to be a thread about the weird rope thing around his dingaling.
I thought this was going to be a thread about the weird rope thing around his dingaling.
I thought this was going to be a thread about the weird rope thing around his dingaling.
I honestly don't consider the method of Carradine's death anymore "shameful" than if he'd had a heart-attack while doing his wife. It's sad because it presents the image of a lonely man desperate to please himself turning to a dangerous act for satisfaction. But I see nothing shameful about it. He was in the privacy of his own room, alone and not bothering another soul. It is EMBARRASSING because of his private behaviors becoming public knowledge but that was neither his intent nor his faullt.
That would have been less contentious.I thought this was going to be a thread about the weird rope thing around his dingaling.
If you subtract Latinos it drops to 66%
In math, we call that a majority.
If you subtract Latinos it drops to 66%
In math, we call that a majority.
So, because whites make up a majority of the population, they get to be the leads in almost everything produced? The Caucasian hold on the majority on this country is rapidly decreasing. In a few decades, when whites are no longer the majority, shall television and film leads suddenly become predominated by Latinos or Asians or whoever is in the racial majority in this country?
Today Hollywood represents the 34% of Americans whom are not white by dishing out supporting roles. Even roles that are allegedly of authority (Tyler Perry in Star Trek, Morgan Freeman in Deep Impact or Bruce Almighty or Evan Almighty, Lawrence Fishburne in The Matrix) end up being subordinate to the principal white protagonists. Roles such as Avery Brooks in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and Edward James Olmos in Battlestar Galactica are rare.
I should admit, before I get too carried away, that I'm as white as they come. But that shouldn't prevent anyone from taking a look at Hollywood and being able to recognize their racial tendencies. Tendencies that, yes, anger the hell out of me. But carry on.
If you subtract Latinos it drops to 66%
In math, we call that a majority.
So, because whites make up a majority of the population, they get to be the leads in almost everything produced? The Caucasian hold on the majority on this country is rapidly decreasing. In a few decades, when whites are no longer the majority, shall television and film leads suddenly become predominated by Latinos or Asians or whoever is in the racial majority in this country?
Today Hollywood represents the 34% of Americans whom are not white by dishing out supporting roles. Even roles that are allegedly of authority (Tyler Perry in Star Trek, Morgan Freeman in Deep Impact or Bruce Almighty or Evan Almighty, Lawrence Fishburne in The Matrix) end up being subordinate to the principal white protagonists. Roles such as Avery Brooks in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and Edward James Olmos in Battlestar Galactica are rare.
I should admit, before I get too carried away, that I'm as white as they come. But that shouldn't prevent anyone from taking a look at Hollywood and being able to recognize their racial tendencies. Tendencies that, yes, anger the hell out of me. But carry on.
And Will Smith is the biggest box office star in the world, playing a wide variety of roles. Morgan Freeman has played a lot of wise man supporting roles, but he's also had lead roles (such as his Alex Cross films). And of course Denzel Washington is a great movie star. There's still a lot of room for improvement in minority representation in Hollywood, but there's also been a lot of progress already made.Today Hollywood represents the 34% of Americans whom are not white by dishing out supporting roles. Even roles that are allegedly of authority (Tyler Perry in Star Trek, Morgan Freeman in Deep Impact or Bruce Almighty or Evan Almighty, Lawrence Fishburne in The Matrix) end up being subordinate to the principal white protagonists. Roles such as Avery Brooks in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and Edward James Olmos in Battlestar Galactica are rare.
And Will Smith is the biggest box office star in the world, playing a wide variety of roles. Morgan Freeman has played a lot of wise man supporting roles, but he's also had lead roles (such as his Alex Cross films). And of course Denzel Washington is a great movie star. There's still a lot of room for improvement in minority representation in Hollywood, but there's also been a lot of progress already made.Today Hollywood represents the 34% of Americans whom are not white by dishing out supporting roles. Even roles that are allegedly of authority (Tyler Perry in Star Trek, Morgan Freeman in Deep Impact or Bruce Almighty or Evan Almighty, Lawrence Fishburne in The Matrix) end up being subordinate to the principal white protagonists. Roles such as Avery Brooks in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and Edward James Olmos in Battlestar Galactica are rare.
What does TNIC stand for?Yeah, but you have what Chris Rock pointed out as the "TNIC" problem. While there are a handful of big name black actors, there are an infinite number of corresponding white actors.
I don't think anyone believes that or has even said it. Well except maybe if someone put the words in the mouth of others. It's more of, there's been a lot of progress but no one's been saying that it's enough or that it's stopping, despite the implication there's some agenda to keep minorities down.I guess the thing is, let's not assume everything is fine now because white people aren't pretending to be black anymore and that we're living in a liberal paradise. Things are better, but they are far from perfect.
I Googled it, but nothing helpful came up.I'll let you look up TNIC on your own I think.![]()
Sure, but neither should people stew in negativity and be hypersensitive and hyper-aware of race. There's a happy medium to be found in racial awareness and pushing for diversity. Some overdo it in both directions.I guess the thing is, let's not assume everything is fine now because white people aren't pretending to be black anymore and that we're living in a liberal paradise. Things are better, but they are far from perfect.
I'm just guessing here, but TNIC probably stands for "the ____ in charge," meaning while the black guy is the authority figure or the smartest character, he's not the star.
It's Chris Rock's assertion that only a few black people are allowed to be "in power" in Hollywood at a time. It's why there are countless big name, huge box office white actors but only a handful (literally) of black actors that can claim the same status.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.