• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Currency & the Federation crew.

And what about those who don't have replicators?
You replicator a piece of a replicator every time you stop in the communal kitchen for Low Grade Mush Recipe 1, and after a few years you got yourself a brand new replicator.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
And what about those who don't have replicators?

We see the Enterprise's public replicators in TNG and DS9 had the Replimat, so even if somebody doesn't have a replicator it's easy to assume that they'd have access to a public replicator. I know there's Robert who doesn't want a replicator in his home, but I think that strictly goes for a food replicator and the Picard family still gets their stuff from some sort of "replicator mal" or whatever.
 
We see the Enterprise's public replicators in TNG and DS9 had the Replimat, so even if somebody doesn't have a replicator it's easy to assume that they'd have access to a public replicator. I know there's Robert who doesn't want a replicator in his home, but I think that strictly goes for a food replicator and the Picard family still gets their stuff from some sort of "replicator mal" or whatever.
I think Robert's fire extinguisher and sprinkler system was all diy
 
okay replicators make anything.
but they need material; is that free?
they run on power; is that free ?

The TNG replicators never needed matter: they were introduced as pure energy-to-matter transfer. The replicators in Enterprise did, and the ones in season 3 of Discovery do - likely due to power limitations after the burn. I don't believe TOS ever specified.
 
okay replicators make anything.
but they need material; is that free?
they run on power; is that free ?

In my head canon the costs of maintaining the replicator infrastructure and supplying any required inputs is relatively low to the point that it's not a issue and a relatively small workforce could handle it.
 
Apologies in advance if this question has been asked before.

I know that currency as we know it is obsolete in the Federation but it is used in DS9 for example in Quarks for entertainment purposes. In the context of DS9, is currency allocated equally amongst the Federation personnel or unequally depending on rank?

It may not be allocated at the individual level. It could be that there's just a general fund at DS9 that is available to all the Starfleet officers stationed there who can use it to buy food, clothes, etc. from the local merchants. Assuming everyone is just using it for small normal purchases, it probably wouldn't be an issue. Maybe the system alerts someone if anyone tries to spend at too fast of a rate (e.g. develops a gambling problem at Quarks).
 
One of Treks inconsistencies

TOS era 23rd century
Spock knew how much his Starfleet training cost
The trouble with Tribbles - the human trader was selling them for credits on a human run spacestation
TAS had a human millionare/billionaire as a character
TOS movie
TVH Kirk and crew were not familiar with paper money

TNG era 24th century
Not everyone has replicators
However Jake Sisko had no money and wanted to borrow latinum from Nog
But in Encounter at Farpoint, Dr Crusher bought fabric on credit
Picards speech in the FC movie is open to interpretation plus he speaks from a position of class privilege

The use of money depends on needs of the plot, like warp speed
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkt
So here's how I think it works:

- Replicators provide most of what you would need day to day (food, clothes, medicine, household supplies, etc.). Even if you don't have a replicator yourself, you can just use a public one for free. Replicators are supplied and maintained by a relatively small branch of government. In addition to this, people maintain shops and restaurants where you can eat or obtain items for free.

- Public programs provide free education, healthcare, and transportation. There might be an allowance system for certain things (e.g. transporter credits) to prevent overuse.

- When you start getting into things that are still scarce, like housing, it gets trickier. I'm assuming decent accommodations are available for everyone (e.g. apartments, modest houses, etc.) but it might get tricky when multiple people want the same house or if there are certain properties that are more desirable (e.g. waterfront properties, Picard's chateau, etc.). Perhaps in these situations when someone moves out of a house there is a lottery system to determine the new owner unless there's a claim by an immediate family member. There would need to be a limitation on individuals owning multiple properties. One thing this doesn't explain is why Raffi lives in squalor in the desert in STP.

- I'm also not sure how it would work if you wanted something even bigger. Like, what if you wanted a science vessel to go exploring? Here I could see some type of application process where you have to justify why you need the item in question, it gets approved by a committee, and then goes into a queue at the shipyard. The process would probably take some time and be dependent on the available capacity of the shipyard.

- While money isn't needed within the Federation, it is needed when Federation members interact non-Federation members. These interactions are governed by negotiated trade agreements. So the Federation would authorize participation in the galactic monetary system (latinum) with certain organizations (e.g. the Ferengi) and provide an allowance to its members that are in roles where they would need it.
 
Raffi does not live in squalor

It kind of looked like the future version of squalor (it was a trailer in the middle of the desert) and she implied she was envious of Picard's living conditions which would imply a sub-standard of living.

“I saw you sitting back in your very fine chateau – those big oak beams, heirloom furniture. I’d show you around my estate, but it’s more of a hovel, so that would just be humiliating.”
 
It kind of looked like the future version of squalor (it was a trailer in the middle of the desert) and she implied she was envious of Picard's living conditions which would imply a sub-standard of living.

“I saw you sitting back in your very fine chateau – those big oak beams, heirloom furniture. I’d show you around my estate, but it’s more of a hovel, so that would just be humiliating.”
I don't live in squalor and would admire anyone owning a fine château. Plus she was being sarcastic with her comparisons,
 
okay replicators make anything.
but they need material; is that free?
they run on power; is that free ?
That is a great point. Maybe each household receives a replicator 'bill' at the end of the month in the same way we get gas & electric bills in the present day.

Also maybe you have to use a PIN or some other form of identification method when using public replicators which you will be billed for at a later date.
 
Kirk, during TOS, would acknowledge when officers earned their pay for the day. But during TVH, he explicitly says that they don’t use money in his century. I don’t think Kirk is confused as to how the economic system works in the 23rd century.

Nog clearly points out that humans abandoned currency-based economics for philosophy of self enhancement. That’s a couple of years after FC when Picard suggested that acquisition of wealth not being the driving force for humanity. Meaning the same economic system from the 23rd century was still in use in the 24th century. Humans in general do not use money.

But it does bring into question as to whether it is optional for a Starfleet officer to have ownership of money, considering Nog also had bars of latinum while being a member of Starfleet.


Didn't Nog nag Jake over Jake wanting something but didn't have the money in an episode?

Also, and while this isn't as probable, who uses phrases that were coined centuries ago?

https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/proverbs.html offers a few fun examples, such as:


To cut a long story short, I lost my mind ♫ (there's a music video to look up) it is very possible that phrases will exist for centuries to be, albeit with altered pronunciation if not verbiage outright... to varying extents. The fun would be to augment such maxims to feel authentic yet in an environment set several centuries someday (by the seashore), all while making it accessible to enough in the audience because most of us, myself not excepted, would probably go nuts if we were teleported to 1584 and sat through one of Shakespeare's plays with the original vernacular and pronunciation intact. "Wherefore art thou" being a great example, since "Wherefore" actually means "why" and not "where", since one lover telling the other why they're part of that o'-so-evil clan in this embryonic form of sappy soap opera as opposed to whether or not they're wandering off to the supermarket to check out the cheese and honeydews for that brunch platter.

Spoiler alert, they off themselves in a way unbecoming to any spy genre show... there should have been a sequel, but I doubt the Montagues and Capulets spent the rest of whatever singing "Incense and Peppemints" while snorting the colour of time and pondering why "time" and "thyme" sound alike but taste ever so differently...
 
I agree that "earned your pay for the week" is certainly a leftover figure of speech. Also "I'll bet you credits to navy beans" is an expression that a guest junior officer in acting command (!) used in one TOS episode.

It's harder to justify Spock reciting exactly how much Starfleet had invested in him, though.

Yes, Nog said something like "Well, if you don't need money, then you certainly don't need MINE" and he kind of has a point. Whatever arrangements Starfleet made for their officers to buy drinks and holosuite time and spins at the wheel weren't set up for their children. (Maybe Jake blew his wad on bad Dom-Jot wagers.) Keiko must have had some arrangements too.
 
I also think when talking about money you have to disregard certain things that were said in TOS before world building was fleshed out.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top