Gene Roddenberry's original Star Trek outline describes Mr. Spock as "probably half Martian" with "a slightly reddish complexion and semi-pointed ears" and "a face so heavy-lidded and satanic you might almost expect him to have a forked tail." Nothing about him actually having a tail!Weren't they also Martians?
Early makeup tests with a reddish skin tone looked fine in color, but appeared fake and pasty in black-and-white. (Remember, it wasn't until 1972 -- three years after Trek TOS was cancelled -- that half of all U.S. households had color TV.) So they went with a yellowish tint that looked okay in both color and black-and-white.Why would an actor painted red be worse than an actor painted green, blue or gold?
Early makeup tests with a reddish skin tone looked fine in color, but appeared fake and pasty in black-and-white.
Hmm, don't think I ever noticed that.(which was the first time Spock's species was actually named in production order)
There was legitimate concern about Spock's "satanic look" in the 60s. Indeed, early promotional pictures actually cropped out his ears and eyebrows because of it.I guess that's why no one's ever heard of Rosemary's Baby, the Masque of the Red Death, and the other devilish films from the 60s. I bet witchcraft was equally taboo, considering the whole Christian mythos, so shows like Bewitched were totally never made. Certainly not as a comedy, at least.
It was a lot easier to sell a devil-like villain in the 1990s then it was to sell a devil-like hero in the 1960s.there's: this one all of us know,
It was a lot easier to sell a devil-like villain in the 1990s then it was to sell a devil-like hero in the 1960s.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.